Literature DB >> 12023503

Power for T-test comparisons of unbalanced cluster exposure studies.

Donald R Hoover1.   

Abstract

Studies of individuals sampled in unbalanced clusters have become common in health services and epidemiological research, but available tools for power/sample size estimation and optimal design are currently limited. This paper presents and illustrates power estimation formulas for t-test comparisons of effect of an exposure at the cluster level on continuous outcomes in unbalanced studies with unequal numbers of clusters and/or unequal numbers of subjects per cluster in each exposure arm. Iterative application of these power formulas obtains minimal sample size needed and/or minimal detectable difference. SAS subroutines to implement these algorithms are given in the Appendices. When feasible, power is optimized by having the same number of clusters in each arm k(A) = k(B) and (irrespective of numbers of clusters in each arm) the same total number of subjects in each arm n(A)k(A) = n(B)k(B). Cost beneficial upper limits for numbers of subjects per cluster may be approximately (5/rho) - 5 or less where rho is the intraclass correlation. The methods presented here for simple cluster designs may be extended to some settings involving complex hierarchical weighted cluster samples.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12023503      PMCID: PMC3456800          DOI: 10.1093/jurban/79.2.278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  8 in total

1.  Sample size calculations for cluster randomised trials. Changing Professional Practice in Europe Group (EU BIOMED II Concerted Action).

Authors:  M Campbell; J Grimshaw; N Steen
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2000-01

2.  Clinical trials of behavioural interventions with heterogeneous teaching subgroup effects.

Authors:  Donald R Hoover
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components.

Authors:  F E SATTERTHWAITE
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1946-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  A COMPARISON OF POWER APPROXIMATIONS FOR SATTERTHWAITE'S TEST.

Authors:  Rachael L Disantostefano; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Commun Stat Simul Comput       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.118

5.  Reporting sexual risk behavior for HIV: a practical risk index and a method for improving risk indices.

Authors:  E Susser; M Desvarieux; K M Wittkowski
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Sample size formulae for intervention studies with the cluster as unit of randomization.

Authors:  F Y Hsieh
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Randomization by group: a formal analysis.

Authors:  J Cornfield
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Randomization by cluster. Sample size requirements and analysis.

Authors:  A Donner; N Birkett; C Buck
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.897

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Contextual determinants of drug use risk behavior: a theoretic framework.

Authors:  Sandro Galea; Jennifer Ahern; David Vlahov
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Methods for sample size determination in cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Clare Rutterford; Andrew Copas; Sandra Eldridge
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 7.196

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.