Literature DB >> 21949460

Power and sample size requirements for non-inferiority in studies comparing two matched proportions where the events are correlated.

Jun-Mo Nam1.   

Abstract

Consider clustered matched-pair studies for non-inferiority where clusters are independent but units in a cluster are correlated. An inexpensive new procedure and the expensive standard one are applied to each unit and outcomes are binary responses. Appropriate statistics testing non-inferiority of a new procedure have been developed recently by several investigators. In this note, we investigate power and sample size requirement of the clustered matched pair study for non-inferiority. Power of a test is related primarily to the number of clusters. The effect of a cluster size on power is secondary. The efficiency of a clustered matched-pair design is inversely related to the intra-class correlation coefficient within a cluster. We present an explicit formula for obtaining the number of clusters for given a cluster size and the cluster size for a given number of clusters for a specific power. We also provide alternative sample size calculations when available information regarding parameters are limited. The formulae can be useful in designing a clustered matched-pair study for non-inferiority. An example for determining sample size to establish non-inferiority for a clustered matched-pair study is illustrated.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21949460      PMCID: PMC3176506          DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2011.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal        ISSN: 0167-9473            Impact factor:   1.681


  11 in total

1.  Analysis of clustered matched-pair data for a non-inferiority study design.

Authors:  Valerie L Durkalski; Yuko Y Palesch; Stuart R Lipsitz; Philip F Rust
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Sample size requirements for stratified cluster randomization designs.

Authors:  A Donner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  On the comparison of correlated proportions for clustered data.

Authors:  N A Obuchowski
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Establishing equivalence of two treatments and sample size requirements in matched-pairs design.

Authors:  J M Nam
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  The design and analysis of paired cluster randomized trials: an application of meta-analysis techniques.

Authors:  S G Thompson; S D Pyke; R J Hardy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Statistical methodology for paired cluster designs.

Authors:  A Donner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Sample size formulae for intervention studies with the cluster as unit of randomization.

Authors:  F Y Hsieh
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  On the sample size for one-sided equivalence of sensitivities based upon McNemar's test.

Authors:  Y Lu; J A Bean
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Comparison of FDG-PET and sestamibi-SPECT in primary hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  D R Neumann; C B Esselstyn; W J Maclntyre; R T Go; N A Obuchowski; E Q Chen; A A Licata
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Non-inferiority tests for clustered matched-pair data.

Authors:  Jun-Mo Nam; Deukwoo Kwon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.