BACKGROUND: To investigate the relationship between fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vascular hyperintensity (FVH), hemodynamics, and functional outcome in atherosclerotic middle cerebral artery (MCA) stenosis using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model based on magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), according to a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months. METHODS: A total of 120 patients with 50-99% atherosclerotic MCA stenosis were included. The training and internal validation groups were composed of 99 participants and 21 participants, respectively. Demographic, imaging data, and functional outcome (mRS at 3 months) were collected. Hemodynamic parameters were obtained from the CFD model. The FVH score was based on the number of territories where FVH is positive, according to the spatial distribution in the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS). The prediction models were constructed according to clinical and hemodynamic parameters using multivariate logistic analysis. The DeLong test compared areas under the curves (AUCs) of the models. RESULTS: The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, the ratio of wall shear stress before treatment (WSSRbefore), and difference in the ratio of wall shear stress (WSSR) were independently associated with functional outcome (all P<0.05). In the training group before treatment, the AUC of model 1a (only clinical variables) and 2a (clinical variables with addition of WSSRbefore) were 0.750 and 0.802. After treatment, the AUC of model 1b (only clinical variables) and 2b (clinical variables with addition of difference in WSSR) were 0.815 and 0.883, respectively. The AUC of models with hemodynamic parameters was significantly higher than the models based on clinical variables only (all P<0.05, DeLong test). In the internal validation group before treatment, the AUC of the model (clinical variables) was 0.782, and that of the model (clinical variables and WSSRbefore) was 0.800. After treatment, the AUC of the model (clinical variables) was 0.833, and that of the model (clinical variables and difference in WSSR) was 0.861. There were no significant differences between the good and the poor functional outcome group concerning FVHbefore scores before treatment (0.30±0.81 vs. 0.26±0.97; P=0.321) and FVHafter scores after treatment (0.08±0.39 vs. 0.00±0.00; P=0.244). CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamics was associated with functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke attributed to atherosclerotic MCA stenosis, while FVH was not. Hemodynamic parameters were of great importance in the prediction models. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: To investigate the relationship between fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vascular hyperintensity (FVH), hemodynamics, and functional outcome in atherosclerotic middle cerebral artery (MCA) stenosis using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model based on magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), according to a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months. METHODS: A total of 120 patients with 50-99% atherosclerotic MCA stenosis were included. The training and internal validation groups were composed of 99 participants and 21 participants, respectively. Demographic, imaging data, and functional outcome (mRS at 3 months) were collected. Hemodynamic parameters were obtained from the CFD model. The FVH score was based on the number of territories where FVH is positive, according to the spatial distribution in the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS). The prediction models were constructed according to clinical and hemodynamic parameters using multivariate logistic analysis. The DeLong test compared areas under the curves (AUCs) of the models. RESULTS: The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, the ratio of wall shear stress before treatment (WSSRbefore), and difference in the ratio of wall shear stress (WSSR) were independently associated with functional outcome (all P<0.05). In the training group before treatment, the AUC of model 1a (only clinical variables) and 2a (clinical variables with addition of WSSRbefore) were 0.750 and 0.802. After treatment, the AUC of model 1b (only clinical variables) and 2b (clinical variables with addition of difference in WSSR) were 0.815 and 0.883, respectively. The AUC of models with hemodynamic parameters was significantly higher than the models based on clinical variables only (all P<0.05, DeLong test). In the internal validation group before treatment, the AUC of the model (clinical variables) was 0.782, and that of the model (clinical variables and WSSRbefore) was 0.800. After treatment, the AUC of the model (clinical variables) was 0.833, and that of the model (clinical variables and difference in WSSR) was 0.861. There were no significant differences between the good and the poor functional outcome group concerning FVHbefore scores before treatment (0.30±0.81 vs. 0.26±0.97; P=0.321) and FVHafter scores after treatment (0.08±0.39 vs. 0.00±0.00; P=0.244). CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamics was associated with functional outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke attributed to atherosclerotic MCA stenosis, while FVH was not. Hemodynamic parameters were of great importance in the prediction models. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Authors: Habib Samady; Parham Eshtehardi; Michael C McDaniel; Jin Suo; Saurabh S Dhawan; Charles Maynard; Lucas H Timmins; Arshed A Quyyumi; Don P Giddens Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-07-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: A Kufner; I Galinovic; V Ambrosi; C H Nolte; M Endres; J B Fiebach; M Ebinger Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Karen L Furie; Scott E Kasner; Robert J Adams; Gregory W Albers; Ruth L Bush; Susan C Fagan; Jonathan L Halperin; S Claiborne Johnston; Irene Katzan; Walter N Kernan; Pamela H Mitchell; Bruce Ovbiagele; Yuko Y Palesch; Ralph L Sacco; Lee H Schwamm; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Tanya N Turan; Deidre Wentworth Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-10-21 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: M Hohenhaus; W U Schmidt; P Brunecker; C Xu; B Hotter; M Rozanski; J B Fiebach; G J Jungehülsing Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Lei Song; Cui Lyu; Guiquan Shen; Tingting Guo; Jiangtao Wang; Wanbi Wang; Xiaoming Qiu; Alexander Lerner; Max Wintermark; Bo Gao Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 4.003