Literature DB >> 16328607

Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Rodrigo Gonzalez1, C Daniel Smith, Edward Mason, Titus Duncan, Russell Wilson, Jacqueline Miller, Bruce J Ramshaw.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic procedures converted to open approaches have been associated with higher complication rates than laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy and appendectomy. Laparoscopic colorectal resections have relatively high conversion rates compared with other laparoscopic procedures. This study was designed to evaluate outcomes of conversions compared with laparoscopic and open colorectal resections.
METHODS: We reviewed 498 consecutive colorectal resections performed between 1995 and 2002. Procedures were divided into laparoscopic colorectal resections, open colorectal resections, or conversions. Demographics, underlying disease, type of procedure performed, and operative outcomes were compared between groups.
RESULTS: Of the 238 laparoscopic procedures performed, 182 were completed laparoscopically and 56 (23 percent) required conversion; 260 were performed open. Conversions were associated with greater blood loss (200 (range, 50-750) vs. 100 (range, 30-900) ml), longer time to first bowel movement (82 (range, 40-504) vs. 72 (range, 12-420) hr), and longer length of stay (6 (range, 2-67) vs.. 5 (range, 2-62) days) than the laparoscopic colorectal resections group. There was no difference in operative time, transfusion requirements, intraoperative and postoperative complications, or mortality between conversions and laparoscopic colorectal resections. Conversions resulted in fewer patients requiring transfusions (4 vs. 14 percent), shorter time to first bowel movement (82 (range, 40-504) vs. 93 (range, 24-240) hr), and shorter length of stay (6 (range, 2-67) vs. 7 (range, 2-180) days) than in the open colorectal resections group. There were no differences in complications or mortality between the conversion group and the open colorectal resections group.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colorectal resections has a relatively high conversion rate; however, the converted cases have outcomes similar to open colorectal resections. In fact, the converted group required fewer blood transfusions than the open group. Experience and good judgment are fundamental for timely conversion of a laparoscopic procedure to open to decrease complication rates. Despite a high conversion rate, surgeons should consider laparoscopic colorectal resections, because even when necessary, conversion does not result in poorer outcomes than laparoscopic colorectal resections or open colorectal resections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16328607     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-005-0258-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  34 in total

1.  Conversion in laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for right colon cancer: risk factors and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Jimmy C M Li; Janet F Y Lee; Simon S M Ng; Raymond Y C Yiu; Sophie S F Hon; Wing Wa Leung; Ka Lau Leung
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Single-incision versus hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched series.

Authors:  Dhruvil P Gandhi; Madhu Ragupathi; Chirag B Patel; Diego I Ramos-Valadez; T Bartley Pickron; Eric M Haas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  What is the definition of "conversion" in laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

Authors:  Sherief Shawki; Badma Bashankaev; Paula Denoya; Christina Seo; Eric G Weiss; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Influence of conversion on the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer compared with primarily open resection.

Authors:  Alexander Rickert; Florian Herrle; Fabian Doyon; Stefan Post; Peter Kienle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Hand-Assisted versus Straight-Laparoscopic versus Open Proctosigmoidectomy for Treatment of Sigmoid and Rectal Cancer: A Case-Matched Study of 100 Patients.

Authors:  Fazli C Gezen; Erman Aytac; Meagan M Costedio; Jon D Vogel; Emre Gorgun
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015

6.  Trainee surgeons do not cause more conversions in laparoscopic colorectal surgery if they are well supervised.

Authors:  Takafumi Maeda; Kok-Yang Tan; Fumio Konishi; Shingo Tsujinaka; Ken Mizokami; Junichi Sasaki; Yutaka J Kawamura
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: outcomes of an emerging minimally invasive technique.

Authors:  Diego I Ramos-Valadez; Chirag B Patel; Madhu Ragupathi; Malak B Bokhari; T Bartley Pickron; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  Conversion during laparoscopic colorectal resections: a complication or a drawback? A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Mariano Cesare Giglio; Valerio Celentano; Rachele Tarquini; Gaetano Luglio; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Luigi Bucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Laparoscopy decreases complications for obese patients undergoing elective rectal surgery.

Authors:  Gabriela M Vargas; Eric P Sieloff; Abhishek D Parmar; Nina P Tamirisa; Hemalkumar B Mehta; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Albert C Y Chan; Jensen T C Poon; Joe K M Fan; Siu Hung Lo; Wai Lun Law
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.