H Fritzsche1, J Goronzy2, K-D Schaser2, C Hofbauer2, A E Postler2, K P Günther2. 1. UniversitätsCentrum für Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland. hagen.fritzsche@uniklinikum-dresden.de. 2. UniversitätsCentrum für Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumourous destruction of the periacetabular region and the proximal femur is a typical consequence of either primary malignant bone tumour manifestation or skeletal metastatic diseases. Pathological fractures of the proximal femur and periacetabular regions due to primary manifestation or metastatic disorders are frequent. OBJECTIVES: Presentation of the most common complications of tumour endoprostheses at the hip and a description of management strategies, including therapeutic recommendations and concepts for complication avoidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current knowledge and our own experience of complication management with the use of megaprostheses around the hip are presented. RESULTS: Compared to elective/primary total hip arthroplasty, megaprosthetic reconstructions following tumour resections have an increased rate of postoperative deep infections, dislocations, incidence of pathological and periprosthetic fractures and of deep vein thrombosis. The postoperative mortality and local tumour recurrence along with deep infections represent the most serious complications. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to primary arthroplasty, the risk of failure and complications following tumour-endoprosthetic replacement is increased. Precise surgical planning and careful selection and preoperative preparation of suitable patients should be performed in close interdisciplinary cooperation with final decision-making on an interdisciplinary tumour board. Wide resection and advanced reconstruction, as well as complicated palliative stabilization due to malignant bone tumour growth around the hip joint should be performed in musculoskeletal tumour centres with profound expertise in osteosynthetic and endoprosthetic reconstruction and consecutive complication management of the pelvis and the proximal femur.
BACKGROUND: Tumourous destruction of the periacetabular region and the proximal femur is a typical consequence of either primary malignant bone tumour manifestation or skeletal metastatic diseases. Pathological fractures of the proximal femur and periacetabular regions due to primary manifestation or metastatic disorders are frequent. OBJECTIVES: Presentation of the most common complications of tumour endoprostheses at the hip and a description of management strategies, including therapeutic recommendations and concepts for complication avoidance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current knowledge and our own experience of complication management with the use of megaprostheses around the hip are presented. RESULTS: Compared to elective/primary total hip arthroplasty, megaprosthetic reconstructions following tumour resections have an increased rate of postoperative deep infections, dislocations, incidence of pathological and periprosthetic fractures and of deep vein thrombosis. The postoperative mortality and local tumour recurrence along with deep infections represent the most serious complications. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to primary arthroplasty, the risk of failure and complications following tumour-endoprosthetic replacement is increased. Precise surgical planning and careful selection and preoperative preparation of suitable patients should be performed in close interdisciplinary cooperation with final decision-making on an interdisciplinary tumour board. Wide resection and advanced reconstruction, as well as complicated palliative stabilization due to malignant bone tumour growth around the hip joint should be performed in musculoskeletal tumour centres with profound expertise in osteosynthetic and endoprosthetic reconstruction and consecutive complication management of the pelvis and the proximal femur.
Entities:
Keywords:
Arthroplasty, hip replacement; Infection; Local neoplasm recurrence; Periprosthetic fractures; Revision surgery
Authors: Jendrik Hardes; Christof von Eiff; Arne Streitbuerger; Maurice Balke; Tymoteus Budny; Marcel P Henrichs; Gregor Hauschild; Helmut Ahrens Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: H Fritzsche; C Hofbauer; D Winkler; K P Günther; J Goronzy; J Lützner; W Kisel; K-D Schaser Journal: Orthopade Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 1.087
Authors: John S Groundland; Steven B Ambler; Lt Daniel J Houskamp; John J Orriola; Odion T Binitie; G Douglas Letson Journal: JBJS Rev Date: 2016-02-09
Authors: M J Friedrich; J Schmolders; G Lob; T M Randau; S Gravius; D C Wirtz; P H Pennekamp Journal: Oper Orthop Traumatol Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 1.154
Authors: Sivaharan Thambapillary; Rozalia Dimitriou; Kostantinos G Makridis; Evangelos M Fragkakis; Peter Bobak; Peter V Giannoudis Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2013-03-20 Impact factor: 4.757