Literature DB >> 16691142

Endoprosthetic reconstruction in 250 patients with sarcoma.

Georg Gosheger1, Carsten Gebert, Helmut Ahrens, Arne Streitbuerger, Winfried Winkelmann, Jendrik Hardes.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We assessed the clinical results and complications associated with a new endoprosthetic replacement system (Mutars) used in 250 patients with a malignant bone or soft tissue tumor. The key features of the system are its cementless, hexagonal-shaped stem (titanium alloy), the possibility of torsion adjustments in 5 degrees -increments, and the Trevira tube for soft tissue attachment. The mean age of the patients was 30.7 years, and the mean followup was 45 months. Prosthetic survival at 5 years was 89.7% for the upper extremity and 68.5% for the lower extremity. Prosthetic survival without any reoperation was 73.4% at 3 years postoperatively and 60.4% at 5 years postoperatively. Prosthetic failure was caused by deep infection in 12% (30 patients) of patients and aseptic loosening in 8% (20 patients) of patients. Stem fracture occurred in only 1.6% (four patients) of patients. Dislocation rates were reduced by using the Trevira tube. Limb survival was achieved in 82.6% to 93.1% of patients depending on the endoprosthetic replacement site, and functional results ranged between 63% to 83% according to the Tumor Society score. Our results suggest limb salvage with the Mutars endoprosthesis is successful with good functional results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16691142     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000223978.36831.39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  127 in total

Review 1.  [New surgical treatment options for bone tumors].

Authors:  D Andreou; M P Henrichs; G Gosheger; M Nottrott; A Streitbürger; J Hardes
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  [Attachment tube for soft tissue reconstruction after implantation of a mega-endoprosthesis].

Authors:  J Hardes; H Ahrens; M Nottrott; R Dieckmann; G Gosheger; M-P Henrichs; A Streitbürger
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  [Reconstruction of the proximal femur with the MUTARS® system].

Authors:  W Winkelmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Revision of broken knee megaprostheses: new solution to old problems.

Authors:  Manish Agarwal; Ashish Gulia; B Ravi; Rupesh Ghyar; Ajay Puri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Management of infection following reconstruction in bone tumors.

Authors:  Sudhir K Kapoor; Rajesh Thiyam
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-07-07

6.  Early Mechanical Failure of a Tumoral Endoprosthesic Rotating Hinge in the Knee: Does Bumper Wear Contribute to Hyperextension Failure?

Authors:  Irene Barrientos-Ruiz; Eduardo José Ortiz-Cruz; Manuel Peleteiro-Pensado; Rodrigo Merino-Rueda
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  What is the Likelihood That Tumor Endoprostheses Will Experience a Second Complication After First Revision in Patients With Primary Malignant Bone Tumors And What Are Potential Risk Factors?

Authors:  C Theil; J Röder; G Gosheger; N Deventer; R Dieckmann; D Schorn; J Hardes; D Andreou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Silver-coated megaprostheses: review of the literature.

Authors:  Tom Schmidt-Braekling; Arne Streitbuerger; Georg Gosheger; Friedrich Boettner; Markus Nottrott; Helmut Ahrens; Ralf Dieckmann; Wiebke Guder; Dimosthenis Andreou; Gregor Hauschild; Burkhard Moellenbeck; Wenzel Waldstein; Jendrik Hardes
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-03-06

Review 9.  [Osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma of the pelvis and lower extremities].

Authors:  W K Guder; J Hardes; G Gosheger; M Nottrott; A Streitbürger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Treatment solutions are unclear for perimegaprosthetic infections.

Authors:  Lisa B Ercolano; Tyson Christensen; Richard McGough; Kurt Weiss
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.