Literature DB >> 27235533

Very long-term outcomes after endoprosthetic replacement for malignant tumours of bone.

R J Grimer1, B K Aydin2, H Wafa3, S R Carter1, L Jeys1, A Abudu1, M Parry1.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this study was to establish what happens to patients in the long term after endoprosthetic replacement for a primary malignant tumour of bone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database to identify all patients who had undergone an endoprosthetic replacement more than 25 years ago and who were still alive. Their outcomes were investigated with reference to their complications and need for further surgery. A total of 230 patients were identified. Their mean age at diagnosis was 20.7 years (five to 62). The most common diagnosis was osteosarcoma (132). The most common site was the distal femur (102).
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 29.4 years (25 to 43). A total of 610 further operations were undertaken, an average of 2.7 further operations per patient. A total of 42 patients (18%) still had the original prosthesis in place. The risk of amputation was 16% at 30 years (31 patients). Those without infection had a mean of 2.1 further operations (one to nine) while those with infection had a mean of 4.6 further operations (two to 11). The risk of infection persisted throughout the life of the prosthesis with a mean of 1% per year becoming infected. Of the 60 patients who developed an infection, 21 (35%) developed this following the primary procedure at a mean of 50 months, but another 19 developed this within a year of another surgical procedure. The risk of infection after any further surgery was 2.7%. The site with the highest risk of infection was the proximal tibia (43.3%). TAKE HOME MESSAGE: This study highlights the inevitable need for further surgery following first-generation endoprosthetic reconstruction, although in most cases, limb salvage is maintained. Late complications, especially infection, continue for the lifetime of the implant. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:857-64. ©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoprosthesis; Long-term survival; Revision; Sarcoma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27235533     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B6.37417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  41 in total

1.  Early Mechanical Failure of a Tumoral Endoprosthesic Rotating Hinge in the Knee: Does Bumper Wear Contribute to Hyperextension Failure?

Authors:  Irene Barrientos-Ruiz; Eduardo José Ortiz-Cruz; Manuel Peleteiro-Pensado; Rodrigo Merino-Rueda
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  What is the Likelihood That Tumor Endoprostheses Will Experience a Second Complication After First Revision in Patients With Primary Malignant Bone Tumors And What Are Potential Risk Factors?

Authors:  C Theil; J Röder; G Gosheger; N Deventer; R Dieckmann; D Schorn; J Hardes; D Andreou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Causes and Frequencies of Reoperations After Endoprosthetic Reconstructions for Extremity Tumor Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Patrick Thornley; Matias Vicente; Austin MacDonald; Nathan Evaniew; Michelle Ghert; Roberto Velez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Imaging following surgery for primary appendicular bone tumours.

Authors:  Imran Khan; Craig Gerrand; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  [Complication profile and revision concepts for megaprosthetic reconstruction following tumour resection at the hip].

Authors:  H Fritzsche; J Goronzy; K-D Schaser; C Hofbauer; A E Postler; K P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  CORR Insights®: What is the Likelihood That Tumor Endoprostheses Will Experience a Second Complication After First Revision in Patients With Primary Malignant Bone Tumors And What Are Potential Risk Factors?

Authors:  Magdalena M Gilg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Distraction osteogenesis reconstruction of large segmental bone defects after primary tumor resection: pitfalls and benefits.

Authors:  Jan Lesensky; Daniel E Prince
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-22

8.  Oncology and functional prognosis are both vital in the surgical treatment of RGCTs around the knee joint.

Authors:  Qing Liu; Hongbo He; Yuhao Yuan; Hao Zeng; Yupeng Liu; Can Zhang; Wei Luo
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

9.  Complications following allograft reconstruction for primary bone tumors: Considerations for management.

Authors:  Joseph A Ippolito; Maximilian Martinez; Jennifer E Thomson; Alexander R Willis; Kathleen S Beebe; Francis R Patterson; Joseph Benevenia
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-12-20

10.  Vascularized fibula with and without extracorporeal radiotherapy for limb salvage surgery in Indian patients.

Authors:  Akshay Tiwari; Sandeep Mehta; S K Sharma; Vijaydeep Chauhan; Himanshu Rohela; Rajan Arora
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.