Literature DB >> 32005659

How and why to build a mathematical model: A case study using prion aggregation.

Mikahl Banwarth-Kuhn1, Suzanne Sindi2.   

Abstract

Biological systems are inherently complex, and the increasing level of detail with which we are able to experimentally probe such systems continually reveals new complexity. Fortunately, mathematical models are uniquely positioned to provide a tool suitable for rigorous analysis, hypothesis generation, and connecting results from isolated in vitro experiments with results from in vivo and whole-organism studies. However, developing useful mathematical models is challenging because of the often different domains of knowledge required in both math and biology. In this work, we endeavor to provide a useful guide for researchers interested in incorporating mathematical modeling into their scientific process. We advocate for the use of conceptual diagrams as a starting place to anchor researchers from both domains. These diagrams are useful for simplifying the biological process in question and distinguishing the essential components. Not only do they serve as the basis for developing a variety of mathematical models, but they ensure that any mathematical formulation of the biological system is led primarily by scientific questions. We provide a specific example of this process from our own work in studying prion aggregation to show the power of mathematical models to synergistically interact with experiments and push forward biological understanding. Choosing the most suitable model also depends on many different factors, and we consider how to make these choices based on different scales of biological organization and available data. We close by discussing the many opportunities that abound for both experimentalists and modelers to take advantage of collaborative work in this field.
© 2020 Banwarth-Kuhn and Sindi.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational biology; differential equation; enzyme kinetics; law of mass action; mathematical methods; mathematical modeling; numerical analysis; prion disease; protein aggregation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32005659      PMCID: PMC7152750          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.REV119.009851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  61 in total

1.  A computational study of discrete mechanical tissue models.

Authors:  P Pathmanathan; J Cooper; A Fletcher; G Mirams; P Murray; J Osborne; J Pitt-Francis; A Walter; S J Chapman
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 2.  Mechanocellular models of epithelial morphogenesis.

Authors:  Alexander G Fletcher; Fergus Cooper; Ruth E Baker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Initial condition of stochastic self-assembly.

Authors:  Jason K Davis; Suzanne S Sindi
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 2.529

4.  Scrapie-infected spleens: analysis of infectivity, scrapie-associated fibrils, and protease-resistant proteins.

Authors:  R Rubenstein; P A Merz; R J Kascsak; C L Scalici; M C Papini; R I Carp; R H Kimberlin
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 5.  Mathematical modeling of gene expression: a guide for the perplexed biologist.

Authors:  Ahmet Ay; David N Arnosti
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 6.  The prion hypothesis: from biological anomaly to basic regulatory mechanism.

Authors:  Mick F Tuite; Tricia R Serio
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 94.444

7.  Dynamics of gray matter loss in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Paul M Thompson; Kiralee M Hayashi; Greig de Zubicaray; Andrew L Janke; Stephen E Rose; James Semple; David Herman; Michael S Hong; Stephanie S Dittmer; David M Doddrell; Arthur W Toga
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Three-dimensional gray matter atrophy mapping in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Liana G Apostolova; Calen A Steiner; Gohar G Akopyan; Rebecca A Dutton; Kiralee M Hayashi; Arthur W Toga; Jeffrey L Cummings; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2007-10

9.  Hsp104-dependent remodeling of prion complexes mediates protein-only inheritance.

Authors:  Prasanna Satpute-Krishnan; Sara X Langseth; Tricia R Serio
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 10.  The Human Gene Mutation Database: towards a comprehensive repository of inherited mutation data for medical research, genetic diagnosis and next-generation sequencing studies.

Authors:  Peter D Stenson; Matthew Mort; Edward V Ball; Katy Evans; Matthew Hayden; Sally Heywood; Michelle Hussain; Andrew D Phillips; David N Cooper
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.132

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Review of the Efforts and Hindrances of Modeling and Simulation of CAR T-cell Therapy.

Authors:  Ujwani Nukala; Marisabel Rodriguez Messan; Osman N Yogurtcu; Xiaofei Wang; Hong Yang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  A group theoretic approach to model comparison with simplicial representations.

Authors:  Sean T Vittadello; Michael P H Stumpf
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2022-10-09       Impact factor: 2.164

3.  Mathematical Modeling of a Supramolecular Assembly for Pyrophosphate Sensing.

Authors:  Fereshteh Emami; Hamid Abdollahi; Tsyuoshi Minami; Ben Peco; Sean Reliford
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 5.221

4.  Lost in modelling and simulation?

Authors:  Kiyohiko Sugano
Journal:  ADMET DMPK       Date:  2021-03-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.