Literature DB >> 32002006

Management of periprosthetic distal femur fractures using distal femoral arthroplasty and fixation - Comparative study of outcomes and costs.

Tarang Tandon1, Baha John Tadros1, Adhish Avasthi1, Richard Hill1, Madhu Rao1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our study compares the outcome and cost of distal femoral arthroplasty to that of Fixation (Plating/Retrograde Nailing) in the management of distal femur peri-prosthetic fractures.
METHODS: We reviewed our database for patients admitted with peri-prosthetic distal femoral fractures between 2005 and 2013 (n = 61). The patients were stratified into 2 groups based on management method. The Distal Femoral Arthroplasty group (Group A) had 21 patients and the Fixation group (Group B) had 40 patients. Outcome & cost were compared. Minimum follow-up was 3 years.
RESULTS: The mean length of stay in group A was 9 days whereas in group B was 32 days. All patients were fully weight bearing by day 3 in group A, compared to a mean of 11 weeks in group B. Mean OKS was 28 and KSS score was 70 in group A compared to 27 and 68 in group B. In group A, there were 2 deaths, 1 superficial infection, and 1 DVT. In group B, there were 6 deaths, 1 failure of fixation, 6 mal-unions, 1 non-union and 2 infections. Overall, the distal femoral arthroplasty procedure costs approximately £9600 and the fixation group costs were on average of £9800.
CONCLUSION: Distal femoral arthroplasty appears to provide good clinical results, with comparable overall costs to fixation.
© 2019 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost; Distal femoral arthroplasty; Outcome; Peri-prosthetic; Total knee arthroplasty

Year:  2019        PMID: 32002006      PMCID: PMC6985021          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  22 in total

1.  Distal femoral arthroplasty for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  S M Javad Mortazavi; Mark F Kurd; Benjamin Bender; Zachary Post; Javad Parvizi; James J Purtill
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Role of long stem revision knee prosthesis in periprosthetic and complex distal femoral fractures: a review of eight patients.

Authors:  Kuntrapaka Srinivasan; David A Macdonald; Christopher C Tzioupis; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Fionna Mowat; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Supracondylar periprosthetic fractures of the knee in the elderly patients: a comparison of treatment using allograft-implant composites, standard revision components, distal femoral replacement prosthesis.

Authors:  Kevan Saidi; Oren Ben-Lulu; Matthew Tsuji; Oleg Safir; Allan E Gross; David Backstein
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  [Treatment of fractures of the distal femur on total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  P Hernigou; A Poignard; O Manicom; M A Chabane-Sari
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2006-04

6.  Primary versus secondary distal femoral arthroplasty for treatment of total knee arthroplasty periprosthetic femur fractures.

Authors:  Antonia F Chen; Lisa E Choi; Matthew W Colman; Mark A Goodman; Lawrence S Crossett; Ivan S Tarkin; Richard L McGough
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 7.  Treatment of acute distal femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty: systematic review of 415 cases (1981-2006).

Authors:  Diego A Herrera; Philip J Kregor; Peter A Cole; Bruce A Levy; Anders Jönsson; Michael Zlowodzki
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Distal femoral replacement in nontumor cases with severe bone loss and instability.

Authors:  Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Anterior femoral notching and ipsilateral supracondylar femur fracture in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M A Ritter; P M Faris; E M Keating
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Predictors of periprosthetic fracture after total knee replacement: an analysis of 21,723 cases.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Matthew Jensen; David Lewallen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  2 in total

1.  A comparison of distal femoral replacement versus fixation in treating periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikhil Ponugoti; Aashish Raghu; Jonathan David Kosy; Henry Magill
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-11       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Distal femur periprosthetic knee fractures in elderly patients: clinical and radiographic outcome after internal fixation.

Authors:  Gianluca Canton; Marko Tomic; Michele Giunta; Guido Maritan; Luigi Murena
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-07-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.