Literature DB >> 31996455

Cortical and Subcortical Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation in Humans with Tetraplegia.

Francisco D Benavides1,2,3, Hang Jin Jo1,2,3, Henrik Lundell4, V Reggie Edgerton5,6,7,8,9,10, Yuri Gerasimenko11,12,13, Monica A Perez14,2,3.   

Abstract

An increasing number of studies supports the view that transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the spinal cord (TESS) promotes functional recovery in humans with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the neural mechanisms contributing to these effects remain poorly understood. Here we examined motor-evoked potentials in arm muscles elicited by cortical and subcortical stimulation of corticospinal axons before and after 20 min of TESS (30 Hz pulses with a 5 kHz carrier frequency) and sham-TESS applied between C5 and C6 spinous processes in males and females with and without chronic incomplete cervical SCI. The amplitude of subcortical, but not cortical, motor-evoked potentials increased in proximal and distal arm muscles for 75 min after TESS, but not sham-TESS, in control subjects and SCI participants, suggesting a subcortical origin for these effects. Intracortical inhibition, elicited by paired stimuli, increased after TESS in both groups. When TESS was applied without the 5 kHz carrier frequency both subcortical and cortical motor-evoked potentials were facilitated without changing intracortical inhibition, suggesting that the 5 kHz carrier frequency contributed to the cortical inhibitory effects. Hand and arm function improved largely when TESS was used with, compared with without, the 5 kHz carrier frequency. These novel observations demonstrate that TESS influences cortical and spinal networks, having an excitatory effect at the spinal level and an inhibitory effect at the cortical level. We hypothesized that these parallel effects contribute to further the recovery of limb function following SCI.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Accumulating evidence supports the view that transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the spinal cord (TESS) promotes recovery of function in humans with spinal cord injury (SCI). Here, we show that a single session of TESS over the cervical spinal cord in individuals with incomplete chronic cervical SCI influenced in parallel the excitability cortical and spinal networks, having an excitatory effect at the spinal level and an inhibitory effect at the cortical level. Importantly, these parallel physiological effects had an impact on the magnitude of improvements in voluntary motor output.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corticospinal; intracortical inhibition; neurophysiology; neuroplasticity; spinal cord injury; spinal networks

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31996455      PMCID: PMC7096150          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2374-19.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  59 in total

Review 1.  Electrical stimulation using kilohertz-frequency alternating current.

Authors:  Alex R Ward
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-12-18

2.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation improves locomotor learning in healthy humans.

Authors:  Oluwole O Awosika; Marco Sandrini; Rita Volochayev; Ryan M Thompson; Nathan Fishman; Tianxia Wu; Mary Kay Floeter; Mark Hallett; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Modulation of motor cortex excitability by different levels of whole-hand afferent electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Golaszewski; Jürgen Bergmann; Monica Christova; Alexander B Kunz; Martin Kronbichler; Dietmar Rafolt; Eugen Gallasch; Wolfgang Staffen; Eugen Trinka; Raffaele Nardone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Comparative study of sensory input to motor cortex in animals and man.

Authors:  S Goldring; E Aras; P C Weber
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1970-12

5.  Variation in torque production with frequency using medium frequency alternating current.

Authors:  A R Ward; V J Robertson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Outcomes of electrical stimulation of the neurogenic bladder: results of a two-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Krzysztof Radziszewski
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.138

7.  Voluntary motor output is altered by spike-timing-dependent changes in the human corticospinal pathway.

Authors:  Janet L Taylor; Peter G Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Release of neurotransmitters in the CNS by spinal cord stimulation: survey of present state of knowledge and recent experimental studies.

Authors:  B Linderoth; C O Stiller; L Gunasekera; W T O'Connor; J Franck; B Gazelius; E Brodin
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.875

9.  A computational model for epidural electrical stimulation of spinal sensorimotor circuits.

Authors:  Marco Capogrosso; Nikolaus Wenger; Stanisa Raspopovic; Pavel Musienko; Janine Beauparlant; Lorenzo Bassi Luciani; Grégoire Courtine; Silvestro Micera
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Weight Bearing Over-ground Stepping in an Exoskeleton with Non-invasive Spinal Cord Neuromodulation after Motor Complete Paraplegia.

Authors:  Parag Gad; Yury Gerasimenko; Sharon Zdunowski; Amanda Turner; Dimitry Sayenko; Daniel C Lu; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 5.152

View more
  22 in total

1.  Electrical Stimulation as a Tool to Promote Plasticity of the Injured Spinal Cord.

Authors:  Andrew S Jack; Caitlin Hurd; John Martin; Karim Fouad
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 2.  Combined neuromodulatory approaches in the central nervous system for treatment of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Brian R Noga; James D Guest
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.710

3.  Novel Noninvasive Spinal Neuromodulation Strategy Facilitates Recovery of Stepping after Motor Complete Paraplegia.

Authors:  Ricardo Siu; Edward H Brown; Samineh Mesbah; Federica Gonnelli; Tanvi Pisolkar; V Reggie Edgerton; Alexander V Ovechkin; Yury P Gerasimenko
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 4.  Toward rebalancing blood pressure instability after spinal cord injury with spinal cord electrical stimulation: A mini review and critique of the evolving literature.

Authors:  Madeleine Burns; Ryan Solinsky
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 2.355

Review 5.  Noninvasive neuromodulation and rehabilitation to promote functional restoration in persons with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jennifer A Iddings; Anastasia Zarkou; Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.283

6.  The Potential of Corticospinal-Motoneuronal Plasticity for Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Hang Jin Jo; Michael S A Richardson; Martin Oudega; Monica A Perez
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2020-08-04

7.  Distinct Corticospinal and Reticulospinal Contributions to Voluntary Control of Elbow Flexor and Extensor Muscles in Humans with Tetraplegia.

Authors:  Sina Sangari; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Abnormal changes in motor cortical maps in humans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Toshiki Tazoe; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 6.228

9.  Acute intermittent hypoxia boosts spinal plasticity in humans with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Lasse Christiansen; Bing Chen; Yuming Lei; M A Urbin; Michael S A Richardson; Martin Oudega; Milap Sandhu; W Zev Rymer; Randy D Trumbower; Gordon S Mitchell; Monica A Perez
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 5.620

10.  Motor cortical circuits contribute to crossed facilitation of trunk muscles induced by rhythmic arm movement.

Authors:  Shin-Yi Chiou; Laura Morris; Weidong Gou; Emma Alexander; Eliot Gay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.