Literature DB >> 32883710

Distinct Corticospinal and Reticulospinal Contributions to Voluntary Control of Elbow Flexor and Extensor Muscles in Humans with Tetraplegia.

Sina Sangari1, Monica A Perez2.   

Abstract

Humans with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) often recover voluntary control of elbow flexors and, to a much lesser extent, elbow extensor muscles. The neural mechanisms underlying this asymmetrical recovery remain unknown. Anatomical and physiological evidence in animals and humans indicates that corticospinal and reticulospinal pathways differentially control elbow flexor and extensor motoneurons; therefore, it is possible that reorganization in these pathways contributes to the asymmetrical recovery of elbow muscles after SCI. To test this hypothesis, we examined motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the arm representation of the primary motor cortex, maximal voluntary contractions, the StartReact response (a shortening in reaction time evoked by a startling stimulus), and the effect of an acoustic startle cue on MEPs elicited by cervicomedullary stimulation (CMEPs) on biceps and triceps brachii in males and females with and without chronic cervical incomplete SCI. We found that SCI participants showed similar MEPs and maximal voluntary contractions in biceps but smaller responses in triceps compared with controls, suggesting reduced corticospinal inputs to elbow extensors. The StartReact and CMEP facilitation was larger in biceps but similar to controls in triceps, suggesting enhanced reticulospinal inputs to elbow flexors. These findings support the hypothesis that the recovery of biceps after cervical SCI results, at least in part, from increased reticulospinal inputs and that the lack of these extra inputs combined with the loss of corticospinal drive contribute to the pronounced weakness found in triceps.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Although a number of individuals with cervical incomplete spinal cord injury show limited functional recovery of elbow extensors compared with elbow flexor muscles, to date, the neural mechanisms underlying this asymmetrical recovery remain unknown. Here, we provide for the first time evidence for increased reticulospinal inputs to biceps but not triceps brachii and loss of corticospinal drive to triceps brachii in humans with tetraplegia. We propose that this reorganization in descending control contributes to the asymmetrical recovery between elbow flexor and extensor muscles after cervical spinal cord injury.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biceps; corticospinal; humans; reticulospinal; spinal cord injury; triceps

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32883710      PMCID: PMC7659455          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1107-20.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  81 in total

1.  Recovery of food-taking in cats after lesions of the corticospinal (complete) and rubrospinal (complete and incomplete) tracts.

Authors:  L G Pettersson; E Blagovechtchenski; S Perfiliev; E Krasnochokova; A Lundberg
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.304

2.  Mapping from motor cortex to biceps and triceps altered by elbow angle.

Authors:  Michael S A Graziano; Kaushal T Patel; Charlotte S R Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway.

Authors:  H Devanne; B A Lavoie; C Capaday
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Voluntary muscle weakness and co-activation after chronic cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  C K Thomas; M E Tucker; B Bigland-Ritchie
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  A novel cortical target to enhance hand motor output in humans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jinyi Long; Paolo Federico; Monica A Perez
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  New observations on the normal auditory startle reflex in man.

Authors:  P Brown; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; T C Britton; B L Day; C D Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Motoneuron Death after Human Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Robert M Grumbles; Christine K Thomas
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  A primary acoustic startle circuit: lesion and stimulation studies.

Authors:  M Davis; D S Gendelman; M D Tischler; P M Gendelman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Motor recovery after spinal cord injury enhanced by strengthening corticospinal synaptic transmission.

Authors:  Karen L Bunday; Monica A Perez
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Neurophysiological characterization of motor recovery in acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  W B McKay; A V Ovechkin; T W Vitaz; D G L Terson de Paleville; S J Harkema
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.772

View more
  9 in total

1.  The effects of slow breathing on postural muscles during standing perturbations in young adults.

Authors:  P Siedlecki; T D Ivanova; J K Shoemaker; S J Garland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Intermittent theta burst stimulation modulates biceps brachii corticomotor excitability in individuals with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Neil Mittal; Blaize C Majdic; Carrie L Peterson
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 5.208

3.  Distinct patterns of spasticity and corticospinal connectivity following complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sina Sangari; Steven Kirshblum; James D Guest; Martin Oudega; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 6.228

4.  Cerebellar contribution to sensorimotor adaptation deficits in humans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Yuming Lei; Monica A Perez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Delays in the Reticulospinal System Are Associated With a Reduced Capacity to Learn a Simulated Feeding Task in Older Adults.

Authors:  Vishvak Rangarajan; Joseph J Schreiber; Beatriz Barragan; Sydney Y Schaefer; Claire F Honeycutt
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Startling stimuli increase maximal motor unit discharge rate and rate of force development in humans.

Authors:  Jakob Škarabot; Jonathan P Folland; Aleš Holobar; Stuart N Baker; Alessandro Del Vecchio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 2.974

Review 7.  Does the reticulospinal tract mediate adaptation to resistance training in humans?

Authors:  Elliott Atkinson; Jakob Škarabot; Paul Ansdell; Stuart Goodall; Glyn Howatson; Kevin Thomas
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2022-07-14

Review 8.  Corticospinal vs Rubrospinal Revisited: An Evolutionary Perspective for Sensorimotor Integration.

Authors:  Rafael Olivares-Moreno; Paola Rodriguez-Moreno; Veronica Lopez-Virgen; Martín Macías; Moisés Altamira-Camacho; Gerardo Rojas-Piloni
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Corticoreticulospinal tract neurophysiology in an arm and hand muscle in healthy and stroke subjects.

Authors:  Myriam Taga; Charalambos C Charalambous; Sharmila Raju; Jing Lin; Yian Zhang; Elisa Stern; Heidi M Schambra
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 6.228

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.