Literature DB >> 31993737

Diffusion-weighted MRI predicts the histologic response for neoadjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer: a prospective study (DIFFERENT trial).

Ken-Ichi Okada1, Manabu Kawai1, Seiko Hirono1, Fumiyoshi Kojima2, Kensuke Tanioka3, Masaki Terada4, Motoki Miyazawa1, Yuji Kitahata1, Yoshifumi Iwahashi2, Masaki Ueno1, Shinya Hayami1, Shin-Ichi Murata2, Toshio Shimokawa3, Hiroki Yamaue5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pre-operative prediction of histological response to neoadjuvant therapy aids decisions regarding surgical management of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). We elucidate correlation between pre-/post-treatment whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and rate of tumor cell destruction. We newly verify whether post-treatment ADC value at the site of vascular contact predicts R0 resectability of BRPC.
METHODS: We prospectively reviewed 28 patients with BRPC who underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging before neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. Correlation between the percentage of tumor cell destruction and various parameters was analyzed. Strong parameters were assessed for their ability to predict therapeutic histological response and R0 resectability.
RESULTS: Pre-/post-treatment whole-tumor ADC value correlated with tumor cell destruction rate by all parameters (R = 0.630/0.714, P < 0.001/< 0.0001). The post-treatment cutoff value of ADC at the site of vascular contact for discriminating histological response of tumor destruction of ≤ 50% and tumor destruction of > 50% was determined at 1.42 × 10-3 mm2/s. It predicts R0 with 88% sensitivity, 50% specificity, and 61% accuracy. For histological response, the post-treatment whole-tumor ADC cutoff value for discriminating between tumor destruction of ≤ 50% and tumor destruction of > 50% was determined at 1.40 × 10-3 mm2/s. It predicts histological response with 100% sensitivity, 81% specificity, and 89% accuracy. It predicts R0 with 88% sensitivity, 70% specificity, and 75% accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: Post-treatment whole-tumor ADC value may be a predictor of R0 resectability in patients with BRPC. Tumor cell destruction rate is indicated by the difference between pre-/post-treatment ADC values. This difference is strongly affected by the pre-treatment ADC value. The cutoff value of ADC at the site of vascular contact could not discriminate R0 resectability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apparent diffusion coefficient; Borderline resectable; R0 resectability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31993737     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01857-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  30 in total

1.  Impact of histological response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on recurrence-free survival in UICC-T3 pancreatic adenocarcinoma but not in UICC-T4.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Murata; Shugo Mizuno; Masashi Kishiwada; Takashi Hamada; Masanobu Usui; Hiroyuki Sakurai; Masami Tabata; Hiroyuki Inoue; Taizo Shiraishi; Shuji Isaji
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.327

2.  Value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in assessing radiotherapy and chemotherapy success in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Zhan-Zhao Fu; Yong Peng; Li-Yan Cao; Yan-Sheng Chen; Kun Li; Bao-Hong Fu
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Diffusion-weighted MRI and MR- volumetry--in the evaluation of tumor response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bilge Birlik; Funda Obuz; Funda D Elibol; Ahmet O Celik; Selman Sokmen; Cem Terzi; Ozgul Sagol; Sulen Sarioglu; Ilknur Gorken; Ilhan Oztop
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Rim Enhancement at MR Imaging Predicts Prognosis after Curative Resection.

Authors:  Sunyoung Lee; Seong Hyun Kim; Hyung Kyu Park; Kee Taek Jang; Jeong Ah Hwang; Seonwoo Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Quisette P Janssen; Stefan Buettner; Mustafa Suker; Berend R Beumer; Pietro Addeo; Philippe Bachellier; Nathan Bahary; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Maria A Bali; Marc G Besselink; Brian A Boone; Ian Chau; Stephen Clarke; Mary Dillhoff; Bassel F El-Rayes; Jessica M Frakes; Derek Grose; Peter J Hosein; Nigel B Jamieson; Ammar A Javed; Khurum Khan; Kyu-Pyo Kim; Song Cheol Kim; Sunhee S Kim; Andrew H Ko; Jill Lacy; Georgios A Margonis; Martin D McCarter; Colin J McKay; Eric A Mellon; Sing Yu Moorcraft; Ken-Ichi Okada; Alessandro Paniccia; Parag J Parikh; Niek A Peters; Hans Rabl; Jaswinder Samra; Christoph Tinchon; Geertjan van Tienhoven; Eran van Veldhuisen; Andrea Wang-Gillam; Matthew J Weiss; Johanna W Wilmink; Hiroki Yamaue; Marjolein Y V Homs; Casper H J van Eijck; Matthew H G Katz; Bas Groot Koerkamp
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Phase I Study of Nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Okada; Seiko Hirono; Manabu Kawai; Motoki Miyazawa; Atsushi Shimizu; Yuji Kitahata; Masaki Ueno; Shinya Hayami; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.480

7.  Apparent diffusion coefficient in estrogen receptor-positive invasive ductal breast carcinoma: correlations with tumor-stroma ratio.

Authors:  Eun Sook Ko; Boo-Kyung Han; Rock Bum Kim; Eun Yoon Cho; Soomin Ahn; Seok Jin Nam; Eun Young Ko; Jung Hee Shin; Soo Yeon Hahn
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine.

Authors:  Daniel D Von Hoff; Thomas Ervin; Francis P Arena; E Gabriela Chiorean; Jeffrey Infante; Malcolm Moore; Thomas Seay; Sergei A Tjulandin; Wen Wee Ma; Mansoor N Saleh; Marion Harris; Michele Reni; Scot Dowden; Daniel Laheru; Nathan Bahary; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Josep Tabernero; Manuel Hidalgo; David Goldstein; Eric Van Cutsem; Xinyu Wei; Jose Iglesias; Markus F Renschler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Factors Predicting Response, Perioperative Outcomes, and Survival Following Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Borderline/Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Mark J Truty; Michael L Kendrick; David M Nagorney; Rory L Smoot; Sean P Cleary; Rondell P Graham; Ajit H Goenka; Christopher L Hallemeier; Michel G Haddock; William S Harmsen; Amit Mahipal; Robert R McWilliams; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Axel F Grothey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 13.787

10.  Diffusion-Weighted MRI in the Assessment of Early Treatment Response in Patients with Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Comparison with Morphological and PET/CT Findings.

Authors:  Eduardo Bruno Lobato Martins; Rubens Chojniak; Luis Paulo Kowalski; Ulisses Ribaldo Nicolau; Eduardo Nóbrega Pereira Lima; Almir Galvão Vieira Bitencourt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Added value of 3T MRI and the MRI-halo sign in assessing resectability of locally advanced pancreatic cancer following induction chemotherapy (IMAGE-MRI): prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Thomas F Stoop; Eran van Veldhuisen; L Bengt van Rijssen; Remy Klaassen; Oliver J Gurney-Champion; Ignace H de Hingh; Olivier R Busch; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Krijn P van Lienden; Jaap Stoker; Johanna W Wilmink; C Yung Nio; Aart J Nederveen; Marc R W Engelbrecht; Marc G Besselink
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  The Role of MRI Pancreatic Protocol in Assessing Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Nervana Hussien; Rasha S Hussien; Darine Helmy Amin Saad; Mohamed El Kassas; Walid F Elkhatib; Mai Ezz El Din
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 3.  Role of imaging in evaluating the response after neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yun Zhang; Zi-Xing Huang; Bin Song
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.