Thomas F Stoop1,2, Eran van Veldhuisen3,4, L Bengt van Rijssen3,4, Remy Klaassen4,5, Oliver J Gurney-Champion4,6, Ignace H de Hingh7, Olivier R Busch3,4, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven4,5, Krijn P van Lienden4,6,8, Jaap Stoker4,6, Johanna W Wilmink4,5, C Yung Nio4,6, Aart J Nederveen4,6, Marc R W Engelbrecht4,6, Marc G Besselink3,4. 1. Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. t.f.stoop@amsterdamUMC.nl. 2. Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. t.f.stoop@amsterdamUMC.nl. 3. Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 6. Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands. 8. Department of Radiology, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Restaging of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) after induction chemotherapy using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) imaging is imprecise in evaluating local tumor response. This study explored the value of 3 Tesla (3 T) contrast-enhanced (CE) and diffusion-weighted (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for local tumor restaging. METHODS: This is a prospective pilot study including 20 consecutive patients with LAPC with RECIST non-progressive disease on CE-CT after induction chemotherapy. Restaging CE-CT, CE-MRI, and DWI-MRI were retrospectively evaluated by two abdominal radiologists in consensus, scoring tumor size and vascular involvement. A halo sign was defined as replacement of solid perivascular (arterial and venous) tumor tissue by a zone of fatty-like signal intensity. RESULTS: Adequate MRI was obtained in 19 patients with LAPC after induction chemotherapy. Tumor diameter was non-significantly smaller on CE-MRI compared to CE-CT (26 mm vs. 30 mm; p = 0.073). An MRI-halo sign was seen on CE-MRI in 52.6% (n = 10/19), whereas a CT-halo sign was seen in 10.5% (n = 2/19) of patients (p = 0.016). An MRI-halo sign was not associated with resection rate (60.0% vs. 62.5%; p = 1.000). In the resection cohort, patients with an MRI-halo sign had a non-significant increased R0 resection rate as compared to patients without an MRI-halo sign (66.7% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.242). Positive and negative predictive values of the CE-MRI-halo sign for R0 resection were 66.7% and 66.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 3 T CE-MRI and the MRI-halo sign might be helpful to assess the effect of induction chemotherapy in patients with LAPC, but its diagnostic accuracy has to be evaluated in larger series.
BACKGROUND: Restaging of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) after induction chemotherapy using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) imaging is imprecise in evaluating local tumor response. This study explored the value of 3 Tesla (3 T) contrast-enhanced (CE) and diffusion-weighted (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for local tumor restaging. METHODS: This is a prospective pilot study including 20 consecutive patients with LAPC with RECIST non-progressive disease on CE-CT after induction chemotherapy. Restaging CE-CT, CE-MRI, and DWI-MRI were retrospectively evaluated by two abdominal radiologists in consensus, scoring tumor size and vascular involvement. A halo sign was defined as replacement of solid perivascular (arterial and venous) tumor tissue by a zone of fatty-like signal intensity. RESULTS: Adequate MRI was obtained in 19 patients with LAPC after induction chemotherapy. Tumor diameter was non-significantly smaller on CE-MRI compared to CE-CT (26 mm vs. 30 mm; p = 0.073). An MRI-halo sign was seen on CE-MRI in 52.6% (n = 10/19), whereas a CT-halo sign was seen in 10.5% (n = 2/19) of patients (p = 0.016). An MRI-halo sign was not associated with resection rate (60.0% vs. 62.5%; p = 1.000). In the resection cohort, patients with an MRI-halo sign had a non-significant increased R0 resection rate as compared to patients without an MRI-halo sign (66.7% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.242). Positive and negative predictive values of the CE-MRI-halo sign for R0 resection were 66.7% and 66.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 3 T CE-MRI and the MRI-halo sign might be helpful to assess the effect of induction chemotherapy in patients with LAPC, but its diagnostic accuracy has to be evaluated in larger series.
Authors: Marc W Fromer; Jenci Hawthorne; Prejesh Philips; Michael E Egger; Charles R Scoggins; Kelly M McMasters; Robert C G Martin Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Cristina R Ferrone; Giovanni Marchegiani; Theodore S Hong; David P Ryan; Vikram Deshpande; Erin I McDonnell; Francesco Sabbatino; Daniela Dias Santos; Jill N Allen; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Jeffrey W Clark; Jason E Faris; Lipika Goyal; Eunice L Kwak; Janet E Murphy; David T Ting; Jennifer Y Wo; Andrew X Zhu; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Georgios Gemenetzis; Alex B Blair; Minako Nagai; William R Burns; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jin He; Vincent P Groot; Ding Ding; Ammar A Javed; Richard A Burkhart; Elliot K Fishman; Ralph H Hruban; Matthew J Weiss; John L Cameron; Amol Narang; Daniel Laheru; Kelly Lafaro; Joseph M Herman; Lei Zheng Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-08-27 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Maximilian Weniger; John Moir; Marko Damm; Laura Maggino; Maximilian Kordes; Jonas Rosendahl; Güralp O Ceyhan; Stephan Schorn Journal: Pancreatology Date: 2020-07-09 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Georgios Gemenetzis; Vincent P Groot; Alex B Blair; Daniel A Laheru; Lei Zheng; Amol K Narang; Elliot K Fishman; Ralph H Hruban; Jun Yu; Richard A Burkhart; John L Cameron; Matthew J Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jin He Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Mark J Truty; Michael L Kendrick; David M Nagorney; Rory L Smoot; Sean P Cleary; Rondell P Graham; Ajit H Goenka; Christopher L Hallemeier; Michel G Haddock; William S Harmsen; Amit Mahipal; Robert R McWilliams; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Axel F Grothey Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Quisette P Janssen; Jacob L van Dam; Deesje Doppenberg; Laura R Prakash; Casper H J van Eijck; William R Jarnagin; Eileen M O' Reilly; Alessandro Paniccia; Marc G Besselink; Matthew H G Katz; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Alice C Wei; Amer H Zureikat; Bas Groot Koerkamp Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 11.816