| Literature DB >> 31988303 |
Annadora J Bruce-Keller1, Allison J Richard2, Sun-Ok Fernandez-Kim2, David M Ribnicky3, J Michael Salbaum2, Susan Newman2, Richard Carmouche2, Jacqueline M Stephens2.
Abstract
Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) is an annual herbaceous plant and a staple of traditional health remedies for metabolic conditions including high cholesterol and diabetes. While the mechanisms of the beneficial actions of fenugreek remain unknown, a role for intestinal microbiota in metabolic homeostasis is likely. To determine if fenugreek utilizes intestinal bacteria to offset the adverse effects of high fat diets, C57BL/6J mice were fed control/low fat (CD) or high fat (HFD) diets each supplemented with or without 2% (w/w) fenugreek for 16 weeks. The effects of fenugreek and HFD on gut microbiota were comprehensively mapped and then statistically assessed in relation to effects on metrics of body weight, hyperlipidemia, and glucose tolerance. 16S metagenomic analyses revealed robust and significant effects of fenugreek on gut microbiota, with alterations in both alpha and beta diversity as well as taxonomic redistribution under both CD and HFD conditions. As previously reported, fenugreek attenuated HFD-induced hyperlipidemia and stabilized glucose tolerance without affecting body weight. Finally, fenugreek specifically reversed the dysbiotic effects of HFD on numerous taxa in a manner tightly correlated with overall metabolic function. Collectively, these data reinforce the essential link between gut microbiota and metabolic syndrome and suggest that the preservation of healthy populations of gut microbiota participates in the beneficial properties of fenugreek in the context of modern Western-style diets.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31988303 PMCID: PMC6985225 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-58005-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Summary of fenugreek-induced metabolic resiliency: decreased hyperlipidemia and improved glucose tolerance.
| CD | CD/FG | HFD | HFD/FG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 148.9 ± 45.7 | 136.2 ± 31.7 | 255.4 ± 32.9*** | 245.7 ± 26.3 |
| LDL Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 9.62 ± 2.6 | 8.48 ± 2.1 | 17.98 ± 4.7*** | 13.83 ± 4.3# |
| HDL Cholesterol (%TC) | 45.15 ± 12.7 | 44.86 ± 5.8 | 28.28 ± 3.3*** | 33.3 ± 5.1# |
| Body Weight (gr) | 31.78 ± 3.2 | 31.57 ± 2.6 | 48.73 ± 2.7*** | 50.03 ± 2.2 |
| Body Fat (gr) | 5.15 ± 1.8 | 5.04 ± 1.2 | 16.61 ± 1.3*** | 16.86 ± 1.3 |
| Fasting Blood Glucose (mg/dl) | 153.4 ± 16.8 | 149.4 ± 23.4 | 211.1 ± 16.8*** | 219.1 ± 21.1 |
| Glucose Tolerance (40 min) | 234.0 ± 49.3 | 213.5 ± 23.3 | 386.1 ± 89.9*** | 311.6 ± 75.8# |
Adult male C57Bl/6 mice were given high fat (HFD) or nutritionally matched control diet (CD) with or without fenugreek (FG; 2% w/w), and subject to measures of metabolic function as described in Methods. Statistically significant differences in metabolic parameters in HFD-fed mice as compared to CD-fed mice are mice are noted by ***(p < 0.001), while significant changes in mice given HFD/FG as compared to HFD-fed mice are noted by #(p < 0.05). Adapted from previously published data[41].
Differences in microbiota community composition in mice with CD- and HFD-shaped microbiota with and without fenugreek.
| Comparison | Score | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weighted Unifrac | CD vs CD/FG | 0.65012 | <0.001*** |
| HFD vs HFD/FG | 0.61915 | <0.001*** | |
| CD vs HFD | 0.796987 | <0.001*** | |
| Unweighted Unifrac | CD vs CD/FG | 0.90777 | <0.001*** |
| HFD vs HFD/FG | 0.885073 | 0.002009** | |
| CD vs HFD | 0.952579 | 0.001009** |
Operational taxonomical units (OTU) were identified based on sequence clustering as described in Methods, and generation of a read count table was performed with the software package ‘usearch’. Statistical tests for differential representation were performed with tools incorporated in ‘mothur’, and statistically significant differences in microbiota community composition between groups were detected using both weighted and unweighted Unifrac phylogenetic analysis tools.
Figure 1Fenugreek changes intestinal microbial populations in mice. Fecal microbiome populations from CD, CD/FG, HFD, and HFD/FG mice were analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing, and multi-dimensional scaled principal coordinate analysis were used to visualize UniFrac distances of fecal samples from individual recipient mice. Samples from CD, CD/FG, HFD, and HFD/FG mice are depicted as blue, purple, red, and green symbols, respectively.
Figure 2Fenugreek increases overall intestinal microbial diversity. Fecal microbiome populations from CD, CD/FG, HFD, and HFD/FG mice were analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing, and box plots were generated to depict differences in Shannon α-diversity. Data show that mice supplemented with 2% fenugreek in their feed exhibited a statistically significant (**p < 0.01) increase in α-diversity compared to mice given CD or HFD alone.
Figure 3Graphical representation of fenugreek’s ability to reverse HFD-induced changes in individual intestinal microbiota. The ability of high fat diet to significantly alter the representation of individual taxa was assessed as described in Methods showing that out of 410 Core OTUs, 57 were significantly increased and 90 significantly decreased by HFD. Fenugreek supplementation significantly reversed the effects of HFD on 50 of these OTUs by reducing the representation of 27 HFD-increased OTUs and bolstering the representation of 23 OTUs reduced by HFD.
OTUs that predicts metabolic decline in high fat-fed mice.
| Correlation (Pearson) of HFD-Decreased, Fenugreek-Corrected OTU’s to Metrics of Metabolic Function | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual OTUs Decreased by High Fat Diet (HF) Corrected by FG | Total Chol. | LDL Chol. | HDLChol. | Body Weight | Body Fat | Fasting Glucose | Glucose Tolerance |
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Lachnospiraceae/Clostridium_XlVa/Species1 | 0.0014 | 0.0001 | |||||
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Lachnospiraceae/Clostridium_XlVa/Species2 | 0.0027 | 0.0025 | |||||
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Lachnospiraceae/Clostridium_XlVa/Species3 | 0.0001 | 0.0034 | 0.0011 | 0.0006 | 0.0001 | ||
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Ruminococcaceae/Flavonifractor | 1.2E-05 | 0.0005 | 0.0001 | 1.6E-06 | 2.1E-06 | 2.2E-05 | 1.9E-05 |
| Firmicutes/Erysipelotrichia/Erysipelotrichales/Erysipelotrichaceae/Turicibacter | 0.0004 | 0.0024 | 0.0015 | ||||
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Ruminococcaceae/Oscillibacter | 0.0002 | 1.3E-05 | 4.0E-05 | 0.0002 | 4.2E-05 | ||
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Ruminococcaceae/Intestinimonas | 0.0009 | 0.0021 | 0.0026 | 0.0004 | 0.0017 | ||
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Lachnospiraceae/Acetatifactor/Species 1 | 0.0012 | ||||||
Individual OTUs in which fenugreek administration reversed high fat diet-induced decreases in representation were correlated against measures of hyperlipidemia. Data are p values of Pearson correlation with total cholesterol (mg/dl), low-density lipoprotein (LDL Chol.; mg/dl), high-density lipoprotein (HDL Chol.; %TC), body weight (grams), body fat (grams), fasting blood glucose (mg/dl), and glucose tolerance (blood glucose levels 40 minutes after oral loading). See Supplementary Table 1 for additional details (log2FC and Pearson r values) on HFD-decreased, fenugreek corrected taxa.
OTUs that predicts metabolic decline in high fat-fed mice.
| Correlation (Pearson) of HFD-Increased, Fenugreek-Corrected OTU’s to Metrics of Metabolic Function | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual OTUsDecreased by High Fat Diet (HF) Corrected by FG | Total Chol. | LDL Chol. | HDL Chol. | Body Weight | Body Fat | Fasting Glucose | Glucose Tolerance |
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Lachnospiraceae/Clostridium_XlVa/Species 4 | 4.9E-05 | ||||||
| Firmicutes/ClostridiaClostridiales/Ruminococcaceae/Anaerotruncus | 0.0004 | 1.3E-08 | 0.0016 | 4.6E-06 | |||
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Lachnospiraceae/Clostridium_XlVa/Species 5 | 5.8E-05 | 0.0024 | |||||
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Lachnospiraceae/Clostridium_XlVa/Species 6 | 0.0002 | 4.9E-09 | 0.0051 | 0.0002 | |||
| Bacteroidetes/Bacteroidia/Bacteroidales/Porphyromonadaceae/Barnesiella/Species 1 | 9.1E-05 | 4.1E-10 | 0.0009 | 0.0009 | 0.0024 | 1.6E-06 | |
| Bacteroidetes/Bacteroidia/Bacteroidales/Porphyromonadaceae/Barnesiella/Species 2 | 0.0005 | 4.2E-09 | 8.8E-06 | ||||
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Lachnospiraceae/Clostridium_XlVa/Species 7 | 8.1E-07 | 5.7E-10 | 4.8E-05 | 0.0001 | |||
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Lachnospiraceae/Clostridium_XlVa/Species 8 | 0.0001 | 0.0002 | 0.0030 | 1.2E-05 | 0.0011 | 1.3E-05 | |
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Lachnospiraceae/Clostridium_XlVa/Species 9 | 4.1E-06 | 5.9E-08 | 0.0007 | 1.2E-06 | 4.1E05 | ||
| Firmicutes/Bacilli/Lactobacillales/Streptococcaceae/Streptococcus | 0.0007 | ||||||
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Lachnospiraceae/Clostridium_XlVa/Species 10 | 0.0009 | 2.1E-05 | 0.0002 | 5.0E-06 | |||
| Firmicutes/Bacilli/Lactobacillales/Lactobacillaceae/Lactobacillus/Species 1 | 4.2E-06 | 7.1E-08 | 4.3E-09 | 5.6E07 | 1.1E-06 | ||
| Firmicutes/Bacilli/Lactobacillales/Lactobacillaceae/Lactobacillus/Species 2 | 1.3E-06 | 0.0001 | 2.9E-08 | 2.1E-09 | 2.9E-07 | 5.2E-07 | |
| Actinobacteria/Actinobacteria/Coriobacteridae/Coriobacteriales/Coriobacterineae | 0.0033 | ||||||
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Lachnospiraceae/Roseburia | 6.0E-05 | 5.4E-07 | 0.0004 | ||||
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Lachnospiraceae/Clostridium_XlVa/Species 11 | 0.0030 | 0.0016 | 0.0015 | ||||
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Clostridiales_Incertae_Sedis_XI/Dethiosulfatibacter | 0.0039 | 0.0004 | |||||
| Bacteroidetes/Bacteroidia/Bacteroidales/Porphyromonadaceae/Barnesiella/Species 3 | 1.4E-05 | 0.0040 | |||||
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Lachnospiraceae/Acetatifactor/Species 2 | 0.0003 | 0.0002 | 1.6E-05 | ||||
| Firmicutes/Clostridia/Clostridiales/Lachnospiraceae/Clostridium_XlVa/Species 12 | 5.2E-05 | 2.2E-07 | 0.0003 | ||||
Individual OTUs in which fenugreek administration reversed high fat diet-induced increases in representation were correlated against measures of hyperlipidemia. Data are correlation coefficients (Pearson r) and p values of correlation with total cholesterol (mg/dl), low-density lipoprotein (LDL Chol.; mg/dl), high-density lipoprotein (HDL Chol.; %TC), body weight (grams), body fat (grams), fasting blood glucose (mg/dl), and glucose tolerance (blood glucose levels 40 minutes after oral loading). See Supplementary Table 2 for additional details (log2FC and Pearson r values) on HFD-increased, fenugreek corrected taxa.