| Literature DB >> 31987049 |
Daniel Samarai1,2, Sandra Lindstedt Ingemansson3, Ronny Gustafsson3, Ulf Thilén4, Joanna Hlebowicz4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the relationship between right ventricular function derived from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), echocardiography and exercise stress test performance, NT-proBNP (N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide) level and NYHA class in patients with a systemic right ventricle.Entities:
Keywords: Atrial switch; Echocardiography; Global longitudinal strain; Systemic right ventricle
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31987049 PMCID: PMC6986040 DOI: 10.1186/s12947-020-0186-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound ISSN: 1476-7120 Impact factor: 2.062
Patient characteristics and descriptive statistics
| After atrial switch operation | ccTGA | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients (n) | 7 | 4 | 11 |
| Male/Female (n) | 7/0 | 2/2 | 9/2 |
| Age (years) | 30 (13-37) | 35 (25-67) | 32 (13-67) |
| History of clinical arrhythmia (%) | 86 | 50 | 73 |
| Moderate TR (n) | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| VSD-closure (n) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NYHA class (n) | |||
| I | 5 | 2 | 7 |
| II | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| III | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| IV | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CMR-RVEF (%) | 44 (32-60) | 48 (23- 59) | 44(23 – 60) |
| Echocardiographic parameters | |||
| GLS (%) | -12.4 (-19.1- -11.0) | -14.6 (-23.8- -7.8) | -13.6 (-23.8 - -7.8) |
| TAPSE (mm) | 17.0 (12.5-18.0) | 15.6 (14.3- 16.9) | 16.9 (12.5- 18.0) |
| AP4 (%) | 14.3 (11.3-18.3) | 15.5 (7.8-19.3) | 14.6 (7.8-19.3) |
| FAC (%) | 0.22 (0.18- 0.37) | 0.24 (0.21-0.28) | 0.22 (0.18 – 0.37) |
SAX (%) LVEF (%) | 8.0 (3.5-15.8) 41 (34-47) | 19.8 40 (27-40) | 11.0 (3.5- 19.8) 40.5 (27-47) |
| NT-pro BNP (ng/L) | 231 (75-1349) | 1591 (250-3537) | 382 (75-2537) |
| Exercise stress test | |||
| Max. heart rate (bpm) | 162 (109-176) | 179 (163-184) | 170 (109-184) |
| Max. SBP (mmHg) | 170 (125-195) | 170 (120-170) | 170 (120-195) |
| Max. working capacity (W) | 170 (105-225) | 210 (106-218) | 180 (105-225) |
| Expected max. working capacity (%) | 66 (43-89) | 87 (86-87) | 71 (43-89) |
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), echocardiographic parameters, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide) and exercise stress test (medians) in seven patients after atrial switch operation and four ccTGA (congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries) patients. TR tricuspid regurgitation. SBP systolic blood pressure. RVEF right ventricular ejection fraction. FAC fractional area change. GLS global longitudinal strain. TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion. SAX short axis transection strain. AP4 apical 4 chamber strain
Correlation coefficients for CMR-derived right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) and given parameters
| Parameters | RVEF | |
|---|---|---|
| r-value | p-value | |
| Max. heart rate | 0.14 | 0.70 |
| Max. SBP | 0.26 | 0.48 |
| Max. working capacity | 0.60 | 0.07 |
| Expected max. working capacity | 0.47 | 0.21 |
| logNT-proBNP | -0.615 | 0.078 |
| NYHA class | -0.114 | 0.754 |
| GLS | -0.63 | 0.04 |
| TAPSE | -0.11 | 0.86 |
| AP4 | 0.56 | 0.08 |
| FAC | -0.11 | 0.74 |
| SAX | 0.60 | 0.27 |
SBP systolic blood pressure. FAC fractional area change. GLS global longitudinal strain. TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion. SAX short-axis transection strain. AP4 apical 4 chamber strain
Fig. 1Scatterplot showing the correlation between cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived systemic RVEF and systemic right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RV GLS)