Literature DB >> 22180653

Quantification of left and right ventricular kinetic energy using four-dimensional intracardiac magnetic resonance imaging flow measurements.

M Carlsson1, E Heiberg, J Toger, H Arheden.   

Abstract

We aimed to quantify kinetic energy (KE) during the entire cardiac cycle of the left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) using four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). KE was quantified in healthy volunteers (n = 9) using an in-house developed software. Mean KE through the cardiac cycle of the LV and the RV were highly correlated (r(2) = 0.96). Mean KE was related to end-diastolic volume (r(2) = 0.66 for LV and r(2) = 0.74 for RV), end-systolic volume (r(2) = 0.59 and 0.68), and stroke volume (r(2) = 0.55 and 0.60), but not to ejection fraction (r(2) < 0.01, P = not significant for both). Three KE peaks were found in both ventricles, in systole, early diastole, and late diastole. In systole, peak KE in the LV was lower (4.9 ± 0.4 mJ, P = 0.004) compared with the RV (7.5 ± 0.8 mJ). In contrast, KE during early diastole was higher in the LV (6.0 ± 0.6 mJ, P = 0.004) compared with the RV (3.6 ± 0.4 mJ). The late diastolic peaks were smaller than the systolic and early diastolic peaks (1.3 ± 0.2 and 1.2 ± 0.2 mJ). Modeling estimated the proportion of KE to total external work, which comprised ∼0.3% of LV external work and 3% of RV energy at rest and 3 vs. 24% during peak exercise. The higher early diastolic KE in the LV indicates that LV filling is more dependent on ventricular suction compared with the RV. RV early diastolic filling, on the other hand, may be caused to a higher degree of the return of the atrioventricular plane toward the base of the heart. The difference in ventricular geometry with a longer outflow tract in the RV compared with the LV explains the higher systolic KE in the RV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22180653     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00942.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  48 in total

1.  Scan-rescan reproducibility of diastolic left ventricular kinetic energy, viscous energy loss and vorticity assessment using 4D flow MRI: analysis in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Vivian P Kamphuis; Jos J M Westenberg; Roel L F van der Palen; Pieter J van den Boogaard; Rob J van der Geest; Albert de Roos; Nico A Blom; Arno A W Roest; Mohammed S M Elbaz
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Intraventricular vortex properties in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Javier Bermejo; Yolanda Benito; Marta Alhama; Raquel Yotti; Pablo Martínez-Legazpi; Candelas Pérez Del Villar; Esther Pérez-David; Ana González-Mansilla; Cristina Santa-Marta; Alicia Barrio; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Juan C Del Álamo
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Ventricular kinetic energy may provide a novel noninvasive way to assess ventricular performance in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  Daniel Jeong; Petros V Anagnostopoulos; Alejandro Roldan-Alzate; Shardha Srinivasan; Mark L Schiebler; Oliver Wieben; Christopher J François
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 4.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Quantification of Structure-Function Relationships in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Kim-Lien Nguyen; Peng Hu; J Paul Finn
Journal:  Heart Fail Clin       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.179

Review 5.  Recommendation for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Phenotypic Study: Imaging Part.

Authors:  Chengyan Wang; Yan Li; Jun Lv; Jianhua Jin; Xumei Hu; Xutong Kuang; Weibo Chen; He Wang
Journal:  Phenomics       Date:  2021-07-28

6.  Exploring kinetic energy as a new marker of cardiac function in the single ventricle circulation.

Authors:  James Wong; Radomir Chabiniok; Shane M Tibby; Kuberan Pushparajah; Eva Sammut; David Celermajer; Daniel Giese; Tarique Hussain; Gerald F Greil; Tobias Schaeffter; Reza Razavi
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-01-25

7.  Analysis of right ventricular flow with 4-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Min Liu; Pei Yao Zhang; Jin Zhu Dai; Hai Yi Ma; Xin Cao Tao; Wan Mu Xie; Jun Wan; An Jing
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-08

Review 8.  Left Ventricular Blood Flow Kinetic Energy Assessment by 4D Flow Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Relevance.

Authors:  Harjinder Kaur; Hosamadin Assadi; Samer Alabed; Donnie Cameron; Vassilios S Vassiliou; Jos J M Westenberg; Rob van der Geest; Liang Zhong; Amardeep Dastidar; Andrew J Swift; Pankaj Garg
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2020-09-10

9.  Altered Right Ventricular Filling at Four-dimensional Flow MRI in Young Adults Born Prematurely.

Authors:  Philip A Corrado; Gregory P Barton; Jacob A Macdonald; Christopher J François; Marlowe W Eldridge; Kara N Goss; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2021-06-03

10.  Feasibility of Cardiovascular Four-dimensional Flow MRI during Exercise in Healthy Participants.

Authors:  Jacob A Macdonald; Arij G Beshish; Philip A Corrado; Gregory P Barton; Kara N Goss; Marlowe W Eldridge; Christopher J François; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2020-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.