Magdalena Lipczyńska1, Piotr Szymański2, Magdalena Kumor3, Anna Klisiewicz3, Łukasz Mazurkiewicz4, Piotr Hoffman3. 1. Department of Congenital Cardiac Defects, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland. Electronic address: mlipczynska@ikard.pl. 2. Department of Acquired Cardiac Defects, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland. 3. Department of Congenital Cardiac Defects, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland. 4. Department of Cardiomyopathy, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Assessment of systemic right ventricle (RV) function is a key point in the follow-up of patients with dextroposition of the great arteries (D-TGA) after the atrial switch procedure. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is considered the reference standard but is not feasible for a considerable number of patients. Experience with the application of 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography for the assessment of systemic RV function in such patients is very limited, and the cutoff strain value differentiating normal and subnormal RV function is missing. METHODS: We prospectively examined, with echocardiography and CMR, 40 patients with D-TGA (mean age, 25.6 ± 5 years; 25 men; 33 after the Senning, 7 after the Mustard procedure) who attended a tertiary adult congenital heart disease centre. RESULTS: There was a linear correlation between global longitudinal strain (GLS) and CMR systemic RV ejection fraction (EF) values (r = 0.4; P = 0.01), systemic RV fractional area change and CMR systemic RV EF (r = 0.41; P = 0.008). There was no correlation between systemic RV s', tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion or the rate of change of the systemic RV pressure with time and CMR systemic RV EF. Only 1 of 19 patients with GLS < -14.2% had CMR systemic RV EF < 45%. The GLS cutoff value of -14.2% predicted the CMR systemic RV EF of ≥ 45% with 90% specificity and 83% sensitivity. Its positive predictive value was 96%. CONCLUSIONS: The systemic RV GLS is able to discriminate between D-TGA patients after the atrial switch with, and those without, a CMR systemic RV EF of at least 45%.
BACKGROUND: Assessment of systemic right ventricle (RV) function is a key point in the follow-up of patients with dextroposition of the great arteries (D-TGA) after the atrial switch procedure. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is considered the reference standard but is not feasible for a considerable number of patients. Experience with the application of 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography for the assessment of systemic RV function in such patients is very limited, and the cutoff strain value differentiating normal and subnormal RV function is missing. METHODS: We prospectively examined, with echocardiography and CMR, 40 patients with D-TGA (mean age, 25.6 ± 5 years; 25 men; 33 after the Senning, 7 after the Mustard procedure) who attended a tertiary adult congenital heart disease centre. RESULTS: There was a linear correlation between global longitudinal strain (GLS) and CMR systemic RV ejection fraction (EF) values (r = 0.4; P = 0.01), systemic RV fractional area change and CMR systemic RV EF (r = 0.41; P = 0.008). There was no correlation between systemic RV s', tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion or the rate of change of the systemic RV pressure with time and CMR systemic RV EF. Only 1 of 19 patients with GLS < -14.2% had CMR systemic RV EF < 45%. The GLS cutoff value of -14.2% predicted the CMR systemic RV EF of ≥ 45% with 90% specificity and 83% sensitivity. Its positive predictive value was 96%. CONCLUSIONS: The systemic RV GLS is able to discriminate between D-TGApatients after the atrial switch with, and those without, a CMR systemic RV EF of at least 45%.
Authors: Karena Wu; Sunkyung Yu; Adam L Dorfman; Ray Lowery; Prachi P Agarwal; Maryam Ghadimi Mahani; Jimmy C Lu Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Alan P Wang; Angela M Kelle; Meredith Hyun; Chelsea L Reece; Phillip M Young; Patrick W O'Leary; M Yasir Qureshi Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Magdalena Lipczyńska; Piotr Szymański; Magdalena Kumor; Anna Klisiewicz; Piotr Hoffman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 3.240