Literature DB >> 31983733

Knowledge and attitudes on pharmacogenetics among pediatricians.

Shahad Rahawi1,2, Hetanshi Naik1, Kathryn V Blake3,4, Aniwaa Owusu Obeng1,5,6, Rachel M Wasserman3,4, Yoshinori Seki1,2, Vicky L Funanage3,4, Kimihiko Oishi1,7, Stuart A Scott8,9.   

Abstract

Increasing enthusiasm for clinical pharmacogenetic testing and the availability of pharmacogenetic-based guidelines indicate that pediatricians will increasingly be expected to interpret and apply pharmacogenetic test results into medical care. Previous studies have identified a lack of knowledge on pharmacogenetics across many physician specialties; however, this has not been systematically assessed among pediatricians. To evaluate pediatrician knowledge, attitude, and educational interest in pharmacogenetics, we surveyed physician cohorts from both the United States (U.S.) and Japan. A total of 282 pediatricians (210 from the U.S. and 72 from Japan) participated in an anonymous survey (online or hardcopy) on pharmacogenetics knowledge, perception, and education. Over 50% of all respondents had >10 years of clinical experience and >75% had some prior education in genetics. However, <10% felt they were familiar with pharmacogenetics, which was very consistent with <20% of the U.S. pediatricians correctly responding to a codeine/CYP2D6 pharmacogenetics knowledge question and <10% of U.S. pediatricians being aware of the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC). Despite being generally unfamiliar with pharmacogenetics, >80% of all respondents indicated that implementation of clinical pharmacogenetic testing will improve efficacy and safety, and that pediatricians should be capable of applying this testing to their practice. Moreover, the majority (83.1%) were interested in educational opportunities on pharmacogenetics, particularly on result interpretation and therapeutic recommendations. Taken together, these data indicate that although practical knowledge of pharmacogenetics among pediatricians in the U.S. and Japan is currently very low, their interest in clinical pharmacogenetics and related education is high, which will likely facilitate future implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31983733      PMCID: PMC7109006          DOI: 10.1038/s10038-020-0723-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1434-5161            Impact factor:   3.172


  27 in total

1.  Adoption of pharmacogenomic testing by US physicians: results of a nationwide survey.

Authors:  E J Stanek; C L Sanders; K A Johansen Taber; M Khalid; A Patel; R R Verbrugge; B C Agatep; R E Aubert; R S Epstein; F W Frueh
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Problems in the regulation of genetic tests in Japan: what can we learn from direct-to-consumer genetic tests?

Authors:  M Watanabe; T Ohata; K Muto; F Takada
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 3.  Pharmacogenetic testing: time for clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  U Amstutz; B C Carleton
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Codeine Pharmacogenetics as a Proof of Concept for Pediatric Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Mark L Hudak
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  US Emergency Department Visits for Outpatient Adverse Drug Events, 2013-2014.

Authors:  Nadine Shehab; Maribeth C Lovegrove; Andrew I Geller; Kathleen O Rose; Nina J Weidle; Daniel S Budnitz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Pharmacogenomics in the clinic.

Authors:  Mary V Relling; William E Evans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  PG4KDS: a model for the clinical implementation of pre-emptive pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  James M Hoffman; Cyrine E Haidar; Mark R Wilkinson; Kristine R Crews; Donald K Baker; Nancy M Kornegay; Wenjian Yang; Ching-Hon Pui; Ulrike M Reiss; Aditya H Gaur; Scott C Howard; William E Evans; Ulrich Broeckel; Mary V Relling
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 8.  Codeine and opioid metabolism: implications and alternatives for pediatric pain management.

Authors:  Vidya Chidambaran; Senthilkumar Sadhasivam; Mohamed Mahmoud
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.706

9.  Primary care physicians' knowledge of and experience with pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  S B Haga; W Burke; G S Ginsburg; R Mills; R Agans
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.438

10.  Public involvement in pharmacogenomics research: a national survey on patients' attitudes towards pharmacogenomics research and the willingness to donate DNA samples to a DNA bank in Japan.

Authors:  Eriko Kobayashi; Tomoya Sakurada; Shiro Ueda; Nobunori Satoh
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 1.522

View more
  17 in total

1.  Pharmacogenetic Testing Knowledge and Attitudes among Pediatric Psychiatrists and Pediatricians in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Chaten D Jessel; Abdullah Al Maruf; Anita Oomen; Paul D Arnold; Chad A Bousman
Journal:  J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-01

2.  Survey of US Medical Oncologists' Practices and Beliefs Regarding DPYD Testing Before Fluoropyrimidine Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kyoin Koo; Amy L Pasternak; N Lynn Henry; Vaibhav Sahai; Daniel L Hertz
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2022-03-03

3.  Comfort with Pharmacogenetic Testing Amongst Pediatric Oncology Providers and Their Patients.

Authors:  Catriona Mowbray; Joyce Turner; Jiaxiang Gai; Shana Jacobs
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Nurs       Date:  2022 May-Jun

4.  Providers' perspectives on the clinical utility of pharmacogenomic testing in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Ina Liko; Yee Ming Lee; Danielle L Stutzman; Allison B Blackmer; Kimberly M Deininger; Ann M Reynolds; Christina L Aquilante
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 5.  Genophenotypic Factors and Pharmacogenomics in Adverse Drug Reactions.

Authors:  Ramón Cacabelos; Vinogran Naidoo; Lola Corzo; Natalia Cacabelos; Juan C Carril
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Anesthesia providers as stakeholders to adoption of pharmacogenomic information in perioperative care.

Authors:  Tien M Truong; Jeffrey L Apfelbaum; Emily Schierer; Keith Danahey; Brittany A Borden; Theodore Karrison; Sajid Shahul; Magdalena Anitescu; Rebecca Gerlach; Randall W Knoebel; David O Meltzer; Mark J Ratain; Peter H O'Donnell
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Targeted Genotyping in Clinical Pharmacogenomics: What Is Missing?

Authors:  Jaime L Lopes; Kimberley Harris; Mary Beth Karow; Sandra E Peterson; Michelle L Kluge; Katrina E Kotzer; Guilherme S Lopes; Nicholas B Larson; Suzette J Bielinski; Steven E Scherer; Liewei Wang; Richard M Weinshilboum; John L Black; Ann M Moyer
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 5.341

8.  Characterizing Pharmacogenetic Testing Among Children's Hospitals.

Authors:  Jacob T Brown; Laura B Ramsey; Sara L Van Driest; Ida Aka; Susan I Colace
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.689

9.  Retrospective Review of Pharmacogenetic Testing at an Academic Children's Hospital.

Authors:  Timothy A Roberts; Jennifer A Wagner; Tracy Sandritter; Benjamin T Black; Andrea Gaedigk; Stephani L Stancil
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.689

10.  Clinical Utility of Pharmacogenomic Data Collected by a Health-System Biobank to Predict and Prevent Adverse Drug Events.

Authors:  Sonam N Shah; Roseann S Gammal; Mary G Amato; Maryam Alobaidly; Dariel Delos Reyes; Sarah Hasan; Diane L Seger; Joel B Krier; David W Bates
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.