Literature DB >> 31983196

Novel Biomarkers Aim at Detecting Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer

Behnaz Bakaeean1,2, Mehran Gholamin3, Seyed Abbas Tabatabaee Yazdi4, Mohammad Naser Forghani5.   

Abstract

Background: Intra-operative molecular diagnostic assays are currently used for the detection of lymph node metastases. The objective of this study was to find new biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy in the detection of metastatic axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients.
Methods: We applied an absolute quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR to quantitate the expression of CK19, KLK11, and CLEC3A mRNAs in 79 FFPE sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) from 35 breast cancer patients. The CK19 was confirmed as a standard biomarker, and the level of expression of selected new markers, KLK11 and CLEC3A, was evaluated in pathologically negative and positive SLNs by using absolute quantitative real-time PCR.
Results: The overall concordance of the CK19 gene with pathological results was 92.4% (less than 250 copies) in negative SLNs and 85% in positive SLNs (more than 250 copies). The sensitivity and specificity of CK19, which were detected by real-time PCR, was 85% and 46%, respectively. Our results revealed that lower CLEC3A was associated with more lymph node involvement. We could set a cut-off point for CLEC3A with the sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 60%. Also, the mean KLK11 had a statistically significant reverse correlation with tumor grade (p = 0.017). Higher CK19 levels were related to more tumor invasion (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Regarding the findings, CLEC3A along with CK19 can be used as a promising marker with high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of metastatic SLN.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CLEC3A; Kallikreins; Sentinel lymph node

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31983196      PMCID: PMC7275625     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran Biomed J        ISSN: 1028-852X


INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the common cause of death amongst women and the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide[[1]]. Axillary lymph nodes status has a vital role in determining the survival status of patients and prognosis of the disease, helping clinicians to decide the most appropriate surgical procedure and subsequent treatment options[[2]]. A SLN is the first lymph node or groups of nodes to which cancer cells are probably spread from a primary tumor. SLN biopsy is a surgical procedure to diagnose if cancer has spread to the lymphatic system[[3]]. Frozen section or touch imprint is a routine method used during surgery for the analysis of the SLN and allow rapid H&E staining[[4]]. Understandably, the accuracy and dependability of these methods rely heavily on the expertise of a cytopathologist and may vary based on institution or clinical setting[[5]]. Due to mistakes in common pathological techniques and the false-negative results, a sensitive and simple method for accurately determining the staging of breast cancer is needed[[7]]. RT-PCR is a highly sensitive diagnostic tool able to detect molecular biomarkers such as MUC1, CK19, and carcino-embryonic antigen in lymph node metastases in patients with invasive breast cancer[[8]-[10]]. CK19 is one of the most popular molecular biomarkers and an epithelial cell marker that is not expressed in normal axillary lymph node tissue[[11]]. The amount of CK19 mRNA expression is related to the level of metastatic foci[[12]]. CK19 mRNA, the most proper marker, exists in high levels in metastatic (not non-metastatic) lymph nodes. Accordingly, it has a high sensitivity potency and ability to identify metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes[[11]]. Based on previous research, the cut-off value is determined by the number of copies of CK19 mRNA as a criterion to distinguish negative nodes (less than 250 CK19 mRNA copies) from micrometastases (250–5000 CK19 mRNA copies or >0.2–2 mm in diameter) and macrometastases (more than 5000 CK19 mRNA copies)[[13]]. According to the recent next generation sequencing studies, CLEC3A and KLK11, are overexpressed in metastatic lymph nodes[[14]]. CLEC3A is a protein related to the great family of C-type lectins and can be seen in normal human breast tissue, but not in any other normal human tissue[[15]-[17]]. This protein is a heparin-binding, cell adhesion modulator that have capability to alter tumor cell invasion and metastasis by modulating tumor cell adhesion and the plasminogen/plasminogen-activator system[[18]]. Kallikreins are a subgroup of serine proteases, enzymes capable of cleaving peptide bonds in proteins, and a family of 15 genes on chromosome 19[[19]]. Studies have revealed the expression of KLK11 in ovarian, prostate, breast, lung, pancreas, and colon cancer tissue[[20]-[22]]. It has also been indicated that KLK11 expression is regulated by steroid hormones such as estrogen[[23]]. CLEC3A and KLK11 are not normally expressed in lymph node tissue[[14]]. Furthermore, there are limited investigations on the presence of this biomarker in metastatic lymph nodes in breast cancer. The aim of this study was to find new biomarkers to improve the diagnostic accuracy in the detection of metastatic axillary lymph nodes. We used CK19 expression as a standard diagnostic tool.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients and source of SLN SLNs (n = 78) were obtained from axillary lymph node dissection. The specimens of 35 breast cancer patients in clinical stages I and II were acquired from the Pathology Department of Pastorno Hospital, Mashhad, Iran. All patients had operations by the same surgical team and had received no chemotherapy from February to December 2017. Based on the permanent section H&E analysis of SLNs, the specimens were divided into two groups of reactive and metastatic lymph nodes. RNA extraction Five to six histological sections, 5 µm in thickness, were cut from each FFPE block. Afterwards, deparaffinization was carried out using xylene, according to the Qiagen (Valencia, CA, USA) protocol. Paraffin was first dissolved by adding 1 ml of xylene and then centrifuged at full speed for 2 minutes. The supernatant was carefully removed, and then 1 ml of ethanol (96-100%) was added to the pellet and mixed by vortexing and centrifuged at full speed for 2 minutes. The supernatant was removed carefully by pipetting then the pellet was dried at room temperature. Next, 240 µl of buffer PKD and 10 µl of proteinase K were added, respectively, mixed by vortexing, and incubated at 56 °C for 15 min, and finally at 80 °C for 15 min. RNA was purified by RNeasy FFPE Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), and the RNA quality was confirmed by gel electrophoresis. cDNA synthesis In reverse transcription reactions, cDNA was synthesized using the PrimeScriptTM RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Japan) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol (37 °C for 15 min and 85 °C for 5 s). The cDNA quality was confirmed by the amplification of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydro-genase as a control. Construction of standard curves for the , and copy number determination Specific controls were constructed for CK19, CLEC3A, and KLK11 by TA cloning of PCR products. Plasmid pBlusScript SK II (+) was used to clone the desired fragment. The recombinant vector was transformed into competent E. coli DH5-α, and the transformed culture was spread on agar Luria-Bertani plates containing ampicillin (100 µg/ ml), IPTG (0.1 mM), and X-gal (20 μg/ml) and incubated at 37 °C for one night. Transformed (white) colonies were picked and processed for plasmid isolation. Standard curves for (A) CK19 and (B) CLEC3A. The Ct is shown on the Y axis, and standard serial dilutions from 106 to 102 (copies/μl) is indicated on the X axis. The correlation coefficient (R2) of CK19 and CLEC3A were 0.93 and 0.94, respectively. Blue and red circles show standards and samples, respectively Plasmid purification was carried out using mini-prep protocol. To prepare standards with known concentrations for a standard curve, the molar concentration of the extracted plasmid was measured with NanoDrop, and then the dilution was made. Finally, standards with a concentration range of 106 to 102 were used to draw the standard curve (Fig. 1). For all the standards, copy numbers were calculated as below[[24]]:
Fig. 1

Standard curves for (A) CK19 and (B) CLEC3A. The Ct is shown on the Y axis, and standard serial dilutions from 106 to 102 (copies/μl) is indicated on the X axis. The correlation coefficient (R2) of CK19 and CLEC3A were 0.93 and 0.94, respectively. Blue and red circles show standards and samples, respectively

Absolute quantitation demonstrates the precise copy concentration of the target gene, but relative quantification determines fold changes in the expression between two samples. Absolute quantitation uses well-known diluted serial standards, and then the standard curve is designed. The standard curve provides a linear relationship between Ct and the initial values of the entire RNA or cDNA, which allows determining the unknown concentration based on its Ct values. Real-time PCR assay The TaqMan® real-time PCR method was performed by using StepOne™ Real-Time PCR. Specific oligonucleotide primers and probes were designed and synthesized by Macrogen, Korea (Table 1). Thermal cycling conditions were designed as follows: initial denaturation at 95 ºC for 15 min, followed by 40–45 cycles at 95 º◦C for 30 s, 60 ºC for 30 s, and 72 ºC for 30 s. All reactions for each gene in reactive and positive samples were run in triplicate.
Table 1

Sequences of primers and probes used in real-time RT-PCR

Primer/probe Oligonucleotide sequence (5'-3')
CK19 F 5'-GGC CTA CCT GAA GAA GAA CCA-3' (21 mer)
CK19 R 5'-AAT CCA CCT CCA CAC TGA CC-3' (20 mer)
CK19 probe5'-FAM-AGT ACG CTG AGG GGC CAA G-BHQ1-3' (19 mer)
KLK11 R5'-GAT GGT GAT GTT GGC GCA T-3' (19 mer)
KLK11 F5'-CAG CTG CCT CAT TTC CGG-3' (18 mer)
KLK11 probe5'-FAM-CAG TTA CGC CTG CCT CAC AC-BHQ1-3' (20 mer)
CLEC3A F5'-GGA CTT GTA ATT TGC ATC CTG GT-3' (23 mer)
CLEC3A R5'-CCA GAG CTT TTC AAT TTG AGT CT-3' (23 mer)
CLEC3A probe5'-FAM-CAG GAA GCA CAG CAA ACG TC-BHQ1-3' (20 mer)

F, forward primer R, reverse primer

Statistical analysis Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS22 software. Results were reported as mean ± standard deviation. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used for normal or abnormal distribution of the data, as well as in percentage descriptions. The relationship between the expression of biomarkers and cancer histology was assessed by linear regression analysis (MannWhitney U test). Kruskal Wallis was employed to compare the groups. The ROC analysis and the AUC were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic values of the markers. Statistically significant correlation was indicated by p < 0.05. Ethical statement The above-mentioned sampling protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (ethical code: IR. mums.fm.rec. 1396.265). Written informed consents were provided by all the participants. Sequences of primers and probes used in real-time RT-PCR F, forward primer R, reverse primer Clinicopathological characteristics of patients

RESULTS

Patient histopathological characteristics A total of 79 lymph nodes from FFPE samples of 35 breast cancer patients were evaluated. It should be noted that patients did not receive any neoadjuvant therapy. According to the pathology results, we stratified patients on the basis of their pathologic status of SLNs into two groups. The first group (I) consisted of 15 patients with 27 pathologically negative lymph nodes, and the second group (II) included 20 patients with 52 metastatic lymph nodes. The age of the patients ranged from 27 to 68 years (mean 50.2), and the clinicopathological findings of these patients are depicted in (Table 2).
Table 2

Clinicopathological characteristics of patients

Characteristics Patients (n = 35)
Age (y)
Total≤ 50> 50Mean35152050/2
Histological type
DuctalLobular341
Grading
GIGIIGIII5228
Tumor size
T1 (0-1.9)T2 (2-3.9)1520
Tumor stage
IAIIA1520
Clinical lymph node status
N1N2305
Pathologic stage
IIAIIBIIIA14165
Estrogen receptor
NegativePositive827
Progesterone receptor
NegativePositive925
Her2/neu
NegativePositive269
Ki67
NegativePositive332
Quantitation of , and mRNAs expression in lymph nodes We used absolute quantitative real-time RT-PCR to determine the expression of CK19, KLK11, and CLEC3A mRNAs, pathologically negative and positive lymph nodes. The actual copy numbers of target genes were also determined by relating the Ct value to a standard curve. The expression levels of the three mRNAs differed histopathologically between positive and negative lymph nodes (Table 3).
Table 3

Mean Ct values and mean copy numbers of the CK19, KLK11, and CLEC3A using real-time RT-PCR

Mrn A markers Nodal status Mean Ct value Mean copy number
CK19 Pathologically reactive node (group I)37.57374.20
Pathologically involved node (group II)32.9748351.90
KLK11 Pathologically reactive node (group I)37.02 62.96
Pathologically involved node (group II)35.06194.70
CLEC3A Pathologically reactive node (group I)35.6044.50
Pathologically involved node (group II)34.7678.10
Expression analysis of , and mRNAs in samples Based on the real-time PCR data, the minimum and maximum values of CK19 expression among all samples were 15.1 and 1028629.6 copies/µL, respectively, and a statistically significant (p = 0.005) up-regulation of CK19 was found in group II compared to group I (Fig. 2A). Expression of the CK19 mRNA, according to cut-off numbers, are illustrated in Figure 3. As shown in group I (reactive), the results were as 46.2% negative, 46.2% micrometastasis, and 7.7% macrometastasis (false-negative cases). Group II (involved) demonstrated 50% micrometastasis and 35% macrometastasis, which is expected and consistent with pathologic reports. Based on the Mann-Whitney U test, the mean CK19 between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.005).
Fig. 2.

Comparing mRNA expression in group I (reactive) and group II (involved) of lymph nodes. (A) CK19, (B) KLK11, and (C) CLEC3A expressions. *The expression of all markers in group II significantly increased compared with group I. Lines in the middle show the mean expression value

Fig. 3

Correlation between histopathology results and CK19 cut-off number in the entire series of 79 SLNs. Group I (reactive): by CK19 copy number (A) 46.2% negative, (B) 46.2% micrometastasis, and (C) 7.7% macrometastasis. Group II (involved): by CK19 copy number (A) 15% negative, (B) 50% micrometastasis, and (C) 35% macrometastasis, (p = 0.005).

Mean Ct values and mean copy numbers of the CK19, KLK11, and CLEC3A using real-time RT-PCR Comparing mRNA expression in group I (reactive) and group II (involved) of lymph nodes. (A) CK19, (B) KLK11, and (C) CLEC3A expressions. *The expression of all markers in group II significantly increased compared with group I. Lines in the middle show the mean expression value The average value of KLK11 mRNA expression for groups I and II were 62 and 194 copies/µl, respectively (Fig. 2B), and the lowest limit of detection was 0.1386. Based on the Mann-Whitney U test, the mean KLK11 expression difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.034). The expression levels of CLEC3A mRNA in groups I and II were 44 and 79 copies/µL, respectively (Fig. 2C). The minimum limit of detection was 15.581 copies/µL. Based on Mann-Whitney U, a statistically significant (p = 0.048) up-regulation of CLEC3A mRNA was observed between the two groups. Also, there was an independent correlation among the three markers (p > 0.05). ROC curve analysis The diagnostic value of the CK19, KLK11, and CLEC3A mRNAs was quantified by the ROC curve (Fig. 4). This discrimination was measured by the AUC. The AUC for CK19 (p = 0.006) indicated that the results of the ROC analysis were reliable. The AUC = 0.788 (95% CI: 0.688-0.945) was consistent with the moderate accuracy test. According to the 250 copies cut-off point for this gene, the specificity was 46%, and the sensitivity was 85%.
Fig. 4

ROC curve for (A) CK19 (AUC = 0.788) and (B) CLEC3A (AUC = 0.743).

Correlation between histopathology results and CK19 cut-off number in the entire series of 79 SLNs. Group I (reactive): by CK19 copy number (A) 46.2% negative, (B) 46.2% micrometastasis, and (C) 7.7% macrometastasis. Group II (involved): by CK19 copy number (A) 15% negative, (B) 50% micrometastasis, and (C) 35% macrometastasis, (p = 0.005). The AUC for KLK11 was not meaningful (p = 0.310). In CLEC3A, the AUC was significant (p = 0.046); therefore, the results showed to be reliable. The amount of AUC = 0.743 (95% CI: 0.535-0.951) corresponded to the moderate test accuracy. According to the ROC analysis, we identified a cut-off of 50 copies/µL CLEC3A mRNA with 78% sensitivity and 60% specificity. Depending on the determined cut-off for the CLEC3A, in group I, patients were 60% CLEC3A-negative and 40% CLEC3A-positive, and in group II, 21.2% CLEC3A-negative and 78.5% CLEC3A-positive. The percentage of positive and negative SLNs on the basis of the cut-off number of CLEC3A and CK19 is presented in Table 4.
Table 4

Sensitivity and specificity of real-time RT-PCR of CK19 and CLEC3A

CLEC3A (cut-off value = 50)
CK19 (cut-off value = 250)
Nodal status
Negative (%) Positive (%) Negative <250 (%) Micrometastasis 250-5000 (%) Macrometastasis >5000 (%)
46.246.27.76040Pathologically reactive node (group I)
15.050.035.021.278.5Pathologically involved node (group II)
0.850.78Sensitivity (%)
0.460.60Specificity (%)
The evaluation of the relationship between KLK11 expression and patients with different nuclear grades by using the Kruskal-Wallis statistical test indicated that the average KLK11 with tumor grade was statistically significant (p = 0.017), and in grade I, it was higher than grade II and III (Fig. 5B). It seemed that the lower levels of CLEC3A were associated with the greater involvement of the lymph node (N2 versus N1).
Fig. 5

(A) Relationship between CK19 and tumor invasion depth (T). *CK19 expression in invasion depth (T2) is higher than (T1) (p < 0.0001); (B) relationship between KLK11 and tumor grades. *KLK11 expression in grade I is higher than grade II and III (p = 0.017)

The mean CK19 had a statistically significant association with tumor invasion depth (T; Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.0001; Fig. 5A), but this relationship was not significant for the other two markers (p > 0.05). A lower value of CK19 was associated with a lower invasion depth (T1 versus T2). The mean CK19 was statistically correlated with the stage of the tumor (Kruskal-Wallis test, p = 0.001), but this relation was not significant for the other two markers (p > 0.05). It seemed that the amount of CK19 at the lowest stage (IIA) was less than the two other stages.

DISCUSSION

A variety of reports have described more accurate diagnosis of micrometastasis in axillary lymph nodes, by using reverse transcription of some indicators such as prolactin-induced protein, CK19, mammaglobin, carcinoembryonic acid, and MUC1. Among these makers, CK19 and mammaglobin have illustrated high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of lymph node metastasis of breast cancer[[25]]. Due to high reliability, these two markers have currently used clinically. CK19 is known as an epithelial cell marker and is widely expressed in more than 90% of breast cancers. In previous studies of CK19 detection, one-step nucleic acid amplification was identified as a valuable intra- operative approach for the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with breast cancer and defined as having the highest sensitivity (about 90%)[[26],[27]]. Based on CK19 cut-off numbers, we observed 92.4% negative nodes (less than 250 copies) for group I and 85% positive lymph nodes (more than 250 copies) for group II, which can be expected and is consistent with the pathologic results. Fujisue et al.[[28]] have reported that the negative cases of CK19 are clearly associated with a negative level of ER-PR and higher levels of Ki67 expression, as well as higher nuclear grade and higher expression of P53. In cases where breast cancer is triple-negative, the expression of CK19 is lower. On the contrary, we observed no significant relationship between chosen biomarkers and ER-PR and Ki67 and Her2/neu expression. Although extensive research has been carried out on identified markers for detecting lymph node involvement in breast cancer, there is still a need to identify newer markers with higher sensitivity and specificity. ROC curve for (A) CK19 (AUC = 0.788) and (B) CLEC3A (AUC = 0.743). Sensitivity and specificity of real-time RT-PCR of CK19 and CLEC3A Pursuant to the next-generation RNA sequencing study by Feng Liang et al.[[14]] in non-SLN-positive group, CYP2A13, KLK11, and CLEC3A demonstrated higher overexpression. Biomarkers identified in this study can provide a new understanding of the mechanism of breast and lymph node involvement, as well as the selection of patients for surgery. Hence, we selected KLK11 and CLEC3A as new biomarkers to detect metastatic SLNs. Evidence has suggested that Kallikreins play a role in cancer, and some of them are potentially new markers of cancer and other biological diseases[[29]]. It has also been shown that the expression of KLK11 in breast cancer contributes significantly to the progression of cancer by increasing the bioavailability of IGF through degradation of IGFBP-3[[30]], and extremely significant expression of KLK11 was observed in patients with breast cancer grades I and II compared to III. In agreement with the results reported by Sano et al.[[30]], our results displayed a significant reverse correlation between overexpression of KLK11 and tumor grade. CLEC3A is specifically expressed in the cartilage, and a significant expression in the breast and colon cancer tissue has been identified[[16],[31]]. The expression of CLEC3A in breast IDC was higher than the normal tissue of the breast and axillary lymph nodes (pathologic N1 versus N0). Increasing the expression of CLEC3A may correlate with the metastatic potential of the IDC breast, which indicates a poor prognosis in the IDC of the breast[[32]]. (A) Relationship between CK19 and tumor invasion depth (T). *CK19 expression in invasion depth (T2) is higher than (T1) (p < 0.0001); (B) relationship between KLK11 and tumor grades. *KLK11 expression in grade I is higher than grade II and III (p = 0.017) Based on our results, the mean expression of this gene was significantly different between the two groups. In order to obtain the highest sensitivity and specificity with an optimal cut-off value, the ROC curve analysis was utilized. ROC analysis indicated the absolute sum of sensitivity and specificity regarding the single copy number cut-offs. The best cut-off for our purpose was specified with a higher AUC. The cut-off value was estimated at 50/µL copies of CLEC3A mRNA, on the basis of the ROC analysis with an AUC equal to 0.743, copy number of 50/µL, indicating the sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 60%. The results from the analysis of CLEC3A expression levels revealed a higher CLEC3A level in metastatic SLN compared to normal tissue (N0 versus N1) and also a higher expression in N1 versus N2 (p = 0.04). Positive and negative predictive values of this test were 100% and 35%, respectively, and the diagnostic value of the CLEC3A gene can be as much as CK19. In summary, although very limited study has been conducted on the expression levels of KLK11 and CLEC3A mRNAs in the SLN tissue in breast cancer, we observed the overexpression of these genes in the positive SLN tissue similar to the CK19 biomarker. Based on our results, the expression of all the three biomarkers increased in group II without any correlation among them. We also found a significant correlation between mean KLK11 and CLEC3A values with nuclear grade (G) and lymph node status (N), respectively. Additionally, higher CK19 values ​​were found to be associated with a more invasive tumor, involvement of the SLN, and a higher stage of cancer. We set a cut-off point for CLEC3A, but more precise cut-offs can be determined by increasing the number of patients and following up with them. The expression profile of CLEC3A, as a useful benchmark described in this study, supports the clinical utility of this biomarker in the diagnosis of metastatic SLNs in breast carcinoma, but more encouraging results merit further investigation.
  32 in total

1.  Quantitative real-time RT-PCR detection of breast cancer micrometastasis using a multigene marker panel.

Authors:  M Mitas; K Mikhitarian; C Walters; P L Baron; B M Elliott; T E Brothers; J G Robison; J S Metcalf; Y Y Palesch; Z Zhang; W E Gillanders; D J Cole
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 2.  Keratin expression in human tissues and neoplasms.

Authors:  P G Chu; L M Weiss
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 3.  The C-type lectin-like domain superfamily.

Authors:  Alex N Zelensky; Jill E Gready
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.542

4.  Expression of CK19 in invasive breast carcinomas of special histological types: implications for the use of one-step nucleic acid amplification.

Authors:  César A Alvarenga; Paula I Paravidino; Marcelo Alvarenga; Rozany Dufloth; Madalena Gomes; Luiz C Zeferino; Fernando Schmitt
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Is routine intraoperative frozen-section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer worthwhile?

Authors:  M R Weiser; L L Montgomery; B Susnik; L K Tan; P I Borgen; H S Cody
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Detection of breast cancer micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes by using polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  A Schoenfeld; Y Luqmani; D Smith; S O'Reilly; S Shousha; H D Sinnett; R C Coombes
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Kallikrein 11 expressed in human breast cancer cells releases insulin-like growth factor through degradation of IGFBP-3.

Authors:  Atsumi Sano; Takafumi Sangai; Hiroyuki Maeda; Michio Nakamura; Takahiro Hasebe; Atsushi Ochiai
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.650

8.  The detection of breast carcinoma micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes by means of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  S Noguchi; T Aihara; S Nakamori; K Motomura; H Inaji; S Imaoka; H Koyama
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Molecular biomarkers screened by next-generation RNA sequencing for non-sentinel lymph node status prediction in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  Feng Liang; Hongzhu Qu; Qiang Lin; Yadong Yang; Xiuyan Ruan; Bo Zhang; Yi Liu; Chengze Yu; Hongyan Zhang; Xiangdong Fang; Xiaopeng Hao
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Overexpression of CLEC3A promotes tumor progression and poor prognosis in breast invasive ductal cancer.

Authors:  Jun Ni; Yun Peng; Fu-Lan Yang; Xun Xi; Xing-Wei Huang; Chun He
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  2 in total

1.  Establishment and Fractionation of Metastatic Axillary Lymph Node Cell Suspension for Determination of Protein Expression Levels of Nuclear cFOS and Cytosolic TGFβ1 from Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Vesna Ivanović; Nasta Dedović-Tanić; Zorka Milovanović; Bratislav Stojiljković; Miroslav Demajo; Vesna Mandušić
Journal:  Biol Proced Online       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 7.717

2.  Kallikrein 11 Down-regulation in Breast Carcinoma: Correlation With Prognostic Parameters.

Authors:  Tulin Ozturk; Ecem Zeynep Kain; Mete Bora Tuzuner; Ayca Diren; Sebnem Batur; Hulya Yilmaz-Aydogan; Oguz Ozturk; Turgay Isbir
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.