BACKGROUND: Routine intraoperative frozen section (FS) of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) can detect metastatic disease, allowing immediate axillary dissection and avoiding the need for reoperation. Routine FS is also costly, increases operative time, and is subject to false-negative results. We examined the benefit of routine intraoperative FS among the first 1000 patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center who had SLN biopsy for breast cancer. METHODS: We performed SLN biopsy with intraoperative FS in 890 consecutive breast cancer patients, none of whom had a back-up axillary dissection planned in advance. Serial sections and immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratins were performed on all SLN that proved negative on FS. The sensitivity of FS was determined as a function of (1) tumor size and (2) volume of metastatic disease in the SLN, and the benefit of FS was defined as the avoidance of a reoperative axillary dissection. RESULTS: The sensitivity of FS ranged from 40% for patients with Tla to 76% for patients with T2 cancers. The volume of SLN metastasis was highly correlated with tumor size, and FS was far more effective in detecting macrometastatic disease (sensitivity 92%) than micrometastases (sensitivity 17%). The benefit of FS in avoiding reoperative axillary dissection ranged from 4% for Tla (6 of 143) to 38% for T2 (45 of 119) cancers. CONCLUSIONS: In breast cancer patients having SLN biopsy, the failure of routine intraoperative FS is largely the failure to detect micrometastatic disease. The benefit of routine intraoperative FS increases with tumor size. Routine FS may not be indicated in patients with the smallest invasive cancers.
BACKGROUND: Routine intraoperative frozen section (FS) of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) can detect metastatic disease, allowing immediate axillary dissection and avoiding the need for reoperation. Routine FS is also costly, increases operative time, and is subject to false-negative results. We examined the benefit of routine intraoperative FS among the first 1000 patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center who had SLN biopsy for breast cancer. METHODS: We performed SLN biopsy with intraoperative FS in 890 consecutive breast cancerpatients, none of whom had a back-up axillary dissection planned in advance. Serial sections and immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratins were performed on all SLN that proved negative on FS. The sensitivity of FS was determined as a function of (1) tumor size and (2) volume of metastatic disease in the SLN, and the benefit of FS was defined as the avoidance of a reoperative axillary dissection. RESULTS: The sensitivity of FS ranged from 40% for patients with Tla to 76% for patients with T2 cancers. The volume of SLN metastasis was highly correlated with tumor size, and FS was far more effective in detecting macrometastatic disease (sensitivity 92%) than micrometastases (sensitivity 17%). The benefit of FS in avoiding reoperative axillary dissection ranged from 4% for Tla (6 of 143) to 38% for T2 (45 of 119) cancers. CONCLUSIONS: In breast cancerpatients having SLN biopsy, the failure of routine intraoperative FS is largely the failure to detect micrometastatic disease. The benefit of routine intraoperative FS increases with tumor size. Routine FS may not be indicated in patients with the smallest invasive cancers.
Authors: Allan W Silberman; Carie McVay; Jason S Cohen; Jack F Altura; Sandra Brackert; Gregory P Sarna; Daphne Palmer; Albert Ko; Leslie Memsic Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Yuankai K Tao; Dejun Shen; Yuri Sheikine; Osman O Ahsen; Helen H Wang; Daniel B Schmolze; Nicole B Johnson; Jeffrey S Brooker; Alex E Cable; James L Connolly; James G Fujimoto Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-10-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Marissa Howard-McNatt; Kim R Geisinger; John H Stewart; Perry Shen; Edward A Levine Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: John Backus; Todd Laughlin; Yixin Wang; Robert Belly; Robert White; Jon Baden; C Justus Min; Ann Mannie; Lorraine Tafra; David Atkins; Kathryn M Verbanac Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Andrew J Creager; Kim R Geisinger; Nancy D Perrier; Perry Shen; Jo Ann Shaw; Peter R Young; Doug Case; Edward A Levine Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: D Geertsema; P D Gobardhan; E V E Madsen; M Albregts; J van Gorp; P de Hooge; Th van Dalen Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-04-27 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: S P Somashekhar; Zahoor Ahmed Naikoo; Shabber S Zaveri; Soumya Holla; Suresh Chandra; Suniti Mishra; R V Parameswaran Journal: Indian J Surg Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 0.656