Literature DB >> 31981517

Effect of a deep-learning computer-aided detection system on adenoma detection during colonoscopy (CADe-DB trial): a double-blind randomised study.

Pu Wang1, Xiaogang Liu1, Tyler M Berzin2, Jeremy R Glissen Brown2, Peixi Liu1, Chao Zhou1, Lei Lei1, Liangping Li1, Zhenzhen Guo1, Shan Lei1, Fei Xiong1, Han Wang1, Yan Song1, Yan Pan1, Guanyu Zhou3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy with computer-aided detection (CADe) has been shown in non-blinded trials to improve detection of colon polyps and adenomas by providing visual alarms during the procedure. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of a CADe system that avoids potential operational bias.
METHODS: We did a double-blind randomised trial at the endoscopy centre in Caotang branch hospital of Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital in China. We enrolled consecutive patients (aged 18-75 years) presenting for diagnostic and screening colonoscopy. We excluded patients with a history of inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal cancer, or colorectal surgery or who had a contraindication for biopsy; we also excluded patients who had previously had an unsuccessful colonoscopy and who had a high suspicion for polyposis syndromes, inflammatory bowel disease, and colorectal cancer. We allocated patients (1:1) to colonoscopy with either the CADe system or a sham system. Randomisation was by computer-generated random number allocation. Patients and the endoscopist were unaware of the random assignment. To achieve masking, the output of the system was shown on a second monitor that was only visible to an observer who was responsible for reporting the alerts. The primary outcome was the adenoma detection rate (ADR), which is the proportion of individuals having a complete colonoscopy, from caecum to rectum, who had one or more adenomas detected. The primary analysis was per protocol. We also analysed characteristics of polyps and adenomas missed initially by endoscopists but detected by the CADe system. This trial is complete and is registered with http://www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1800017675.
FINDINGS: Between Sept 3, 2018, and Jan 11, 2019, 1046 patients were enrolled to the study, of whom 36 were excluded before randomisation, 508 were allocated colonoscopy with polyp detection using the CADe system, and 502 were allocated colonoscopy with the sham system. After further excluding patients who met exclusion criteria, 484 patients in the CADe group and 478 in the sham group were included in analyses. The ADR was significantly greater in the CADe group than in the sham group, with 165 (34%) of 484 patients allocated to the CADe system having one or more adenomas detected versus 132 (28%) of 478 allocated to the sham system (odds ratio 1·36, 95% CI 1·03-1·79; p=0·030). No complications were reported among all colonoscopy procedures. Polyps initially missed by the endoscopist but identified by the CADe system were generally small in size, isochromatic, flat in shape, had an unclear boundary, were partly behind colon folds, and were on the edge of the visual field.
INTERPRETATION: Polyps initially missed by the endoscopist had characteristics that are sometimes difficult for skilled endoscopists to recognise. Such polyps could be detected using a high-performance CADe system during colonoscopy. The effect of CADe during colonoscopy on the incidence of interval colorectal cancer should be investigated. FUNDING: None.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 31981517     DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30411-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol


  63 in total

Review 1.  Designing deep learning studies in cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Andreas Kleppe; Ole-Johan Skrede; Sepp De Raedt; Knut Liestøl; David J Kerr; Håvard E Danielsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Welcoming new guidelines for AI clinical research.

Authors:  Eric J Topol
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  UEG Week 2020 Poster Presentations.

Authors: 
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Artificial Intelligence for Understanding Imaging, Text, and Data in Gastroenterology.

Authors:  Ryan W Stidham
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-07

Review 5.  How to evaluate deep learning for cancer diagnostics - factors and recommendations.

Authors:  Roxana Daneshjou; Bryan He; David Ouyang; James Y Zou
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 10.680

Review 6.  Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan Liu; Samantha Cruz Rivera; David Moher; Melanie J Calvert; Alastair K Denniston
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2020-09-09

Review 7.  Artificial Intelligence in Lower Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: The Current Status and Future Perspective.

Authors:  Sebastian Manuel Milluzzo; Paola Cesaro; Leonardo Minelli Grazioli; Nicola Olivari; Cristiano Spada
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2021-01-13

Review 8.  Artificial intelligence applications in inflammatory bowel disease: Emerging technologies and future directions.

Authors:  John Gubatan; Steven Levitte; Akshar Patel; Tatiana Balabanis; Mike T Wei; Sidhartha R Sinha
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy.

Authors:  Yutaka Okagawa; Seiichiro Abe; Masayoshi Yamada; Ichiro Oda; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  A Gratifying Step forward for the Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Endoscopy: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Yixin Xu; Yulin Tan; Yibo Wang; Jie Gao; Dapeng Wu; Xuezhong Xu
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 1.719

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.