Literature DB >> 31980520

Reciprocity and behavioral heterogeneity govern the stability of social networks.

Roslyn Dakin1,2, T Brandt Ryder1,3.   

Abstract

The dynamics of social networks can determine the transmission of information, the spread of diseases, and the evolution of behavior. Despite this broad importance, a general framework for predicting social network stability has not been proposed. Here we present longitudinal data on the social dynamics of a cooperative bird species, the wire-tailed manakin, to evaluate the potential causes of temporal network stability. We find that when partners interact less frequently and when social connectedness increases, the network is subsequently less stable. Social connectivity was also negatively associated with the temporal persistence of coalition partnerships on an annual timescale. This negative association between connectivity and stability was surprising, especially given that individual manakins who were more connected also had more stable partnerships. This apparent paradox arises from a within-individual behavioral trade-off between partnership quantity and quality. Crucially, this trade-off is easily masked by behavioral variation among individuals. Using a simulation, we show that these results are explained by a simple model that combines among-individual behavioral heterogeneity and reciprocity within the network. As social networks become more connected, individuals face a trade-off between partnership quantity and maintenance. This model also demonstrates how among-individual behavioral heterogeneity, a ubiquitous feature of natural societies, can improve social stability. Together, these findings provide unifying principles that are expected to govern diverse social systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavioral ecology; cooperation; dynamic networks; personality; social networks

Year:  2020        PMID: 31980520      PMCID: PMC7022202          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1913284117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  38 in total

1.  Emergence of scaling in random networks

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Universal resilience patterns in complex networks.

Authors:  Jianxi Gao; Baruch Barzel; Albert-László Barabási
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Predicting fate from early connectivity in a social network.

Authors:  David B McDonald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The network motif architecture of dominance hierarchies.

Authors:  Daizaburo Shizuka; David B McDonald
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Dynamic network partnerships and social contagion drive cooperation.

Authors:  Roslyn Dakin; T Brandt Ryder
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Behavioural hypervolumes of spider communities predict community performance and disbandment.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Co-evolution of behaviour and social network structure promotes human cooperation.

Authors:  Katrin Fehl; Daniel J van der Post; Dirk Semmann
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Family network size and survival across the lifespan of female macaques.

Authors:  L J N Brent; A Ruiz-Lambides; M L Platt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Social networks in the lek-mating wire-tailed manakin (Pipra filicauda).

Authors:  Thomas B Ryder; David B McDonald; John G Blake; Patricia G Parker; Bette A Loiselle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Individual and Group Performance Suffers from Social Niche Disruption.

Authors:  Kate L Laskowski; Pierre-Olivier Montiglio; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.367

View more
  3 in total

1.  Reciprocity and behavioral heterogeneity govern the stability of social networks.

Authors:  Roslyn Dakin; T Brandt Ryder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Volatile social environments can favour investments in quality over quantity of social relationships.

Authors:  Thomas G Aubier; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  Social fluidity mobilizes contagion in human and animal populations.

Authors:  Ewan Colman; Vittoria Colizza; Ephraim M Hanks; David P Hughes; Shweta Bansal
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 8.713

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.