| Literature DB >> 31978980 |
Su Woong Yoo1, Md Sunny Anam Chowdhury1,2, Subin Jeon1, Sae-Ryung Kang1, Sang-Geon Cho3, Jahae Kim3, Changho Lee1,4, Young Jae Ryu5, Ho-Chun Song3,4, Hee-Seung Bom1,4, Jung-Joon Min1,4, Seong Young Kwon1,4.
Abstract
We investigated whether the performance of serum thyroglobulin (Tg) for response prediction could be improved based on the iodine uptake pattern on the post-therapeutic I-131 whole body scan (RxWBS) and the degree of thyroid tissue damage with radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy. A total of 319 patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma who underwent total thyroidectomy and RAI therapy were included. Based on the presence/absence of focal uptake at the anterior midline of the neck above the thyroidectomy bed on RxWBS, patients were classified into positive and negative uptake groups. Serum Tg was measured immediately before (D0Tg) and 7 days after RAI therapy (D7Tg). Patients were further categorized into favorable and unfavorable Tg groups based on the prediction of excellent response (ER) using scan-corrected Tg developed through the stepwise combination of D0Tg with ratio Tg (D7Tg/D0Tg). We investigated whether the predictive performance for ER improved with the application of scan-corrected Tg compared to the single Tg cutoff. The combined approach using scan-corrected Tg showed better predictive performance for ER than the single cutoff of D0Tg alone (p < 0.001). Therefore, scan-corrected Tg can be a promising biomarker to predict the therapeutic responses after RAI therapy.Entities:
Keywords: differentiated thyroid carcinoma; iodine scan; therapeutic response; thyroglobulin
Year: 2020 PMID: 31978980 PMCID: PMC7072233 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12020262
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Demographic distribution of the study population (n = 319).
| Parameters | No. of Patients |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | |
| Mean (range) | 47.2 ± 11.5 (22–83) |
| Male/female | 84 (26.3%)/235 (73.7%) |
| Histology | |
| Papillary thyroid carcinoma | 319 (100.0%) |
| Diameter of the largest tumor (mm) | |
| Mean (range) | 12.2 ± 8.9 (2–70) |
| <10 | 148 (46.4%) |
| ≥10 | 171 (53.6%) |
| Presence of ETE 1 | |
| No ETE/microscopic ETE/gross ETE | 181 (56.8%)/107 (33.5%)/31 (9.7%) |
| Multiplicity | |
| Solitary/multiple | 163 (51.1%)/156 (48.9%) |
| T stage | |
| T1 | 169 (53.0%) |
| T2 | 9 (2.8%) |
| T3 | 122 (38.2%) |
| T4 | 19 (6.0%) |
| N stage | |
| N0 | 13 (4.1%) |
| N1a | 230 (72.1%) |
| N1b | 76 (23.8%) |
| Interval between the operation and RAI | |
| Mean (range) | 98.4 ± 16 (57–160) |
| Dose of administered I-131 (GBq) | |
| 3.70 | 192 (60.2%) |
| 5.55 | 9 (2.8%) |
| 6.66 | 118 (37.0%) |
| Presence of midline uptake on RxWBS 3 | |
| Negative | 210 (65.8%) |
| Positive | 109 (34.2%) |
1 ETE, extrathyroidal extension; 2 RAI, radioactive iodine; 3 RxWBS, post-therapeutic I-131 whole body scan.
Figure 1Diagnostic flow-chart based on the iodine scan-corrected thyroglobulin (Tg) for response prediction. Serum Tg and ratio Tg were optimized using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in each step. (RxWBS, post-therapeutic I-131 whole body scan; Tg, thyroglobulin; ratio Tg, serum thyroglobulin 7 days after the radioactive iodine therapy/serum thyroglobulin immediately before the radioactive iodine therapy; D7Tg, serum thyroglobulin 7 days after the radioactive iodine therapy; D0Tg, serum thyroglobulin immediately before the radioactive iodine therapy; NA, not applicable; ROC, receiver operating characteristic).
Univariate analysis of clinicopathologic variables for prediction of the therapeutic response.
| Variables | Excellent Response (%) | Non-Excellent Response (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | |||
| <45 | 91 (39.7) | 47 (52.2) | 0.043 * |
| ≥45 | 138 (60.3) | 43 (47.8) | |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 61 (26.6) | 23 (25.6) | 0.843 |
| Female | 168 (73.4) | 67 (74.4) | |
| Tumor size (mm) | |||
| <10 | 105 (45.9) | 43 (47.8) | 0.756 |
| ≥10 | 124 (54.1) | 47 (52.2) | |
| Presence of ETE 1 | |||
| No | 129 (56.3) | 52 (57.8) | 0.815 |
| Yes | 100 (43.7) | 38 (42.2) | |
| Multiplicity | |||
| Solitary | 116 (50.7) | 47 (52.2) | 0.843 |
| Multiple | 113 (49.3) | 43 (47.8) | |
| T stage | |||
| T1 | 120 (52.4) | 49 (54.4) | 0.691 |
| T2 | 8 (3.5) | 1 (1.1) | |
| T3 | 88 (38.4) | 34 (37.8) | |
| T4 | 13 (5.7) | 6 (6.7) | |
| N stage | |||
| N0/Nx | 11 (4.8) | 2 (2.2) | 0.275 |
| N1a | 168 (73.4) | 62 (68.9) | |
| N1b | 50 (21.8) | 26 (28.9) | |
| Presence of midline uptake on RxWBS 2 | |||
| Negative | 143 (62.4) | 67 (74.4) | 0.042 * |
| Positive | 86 (37.6) | 23 (25.6) | |
| Stimulated Tg before RAI 3 therapy (D0Tg 4, ng/mL) | 1.22 ± 1.94 | 11.73 ± 34.71 | <0.001 * |
| Single cutoff of D0Tg (ng/mL) | |||
| <2.0 | 189 (82.5) | 29 (32.2) | <0.001 * |
| ≥2.0 | 40 (17.5) | 61 (67.8) | |
| Scan-corrected Tg | |||
| Favorable (good Px 5) | 208 (90.8) | 32 (35.6) | <0.001 * |
| Unfavorable (poor Px) | 21 (9.2) | 58 (64.4) |
1 ETE, extrathyroidal extension; 2 RxWBS, post-therapeutic I-131 whole body scan; 3 RAI, radioactive iodine; 4 D0Tg, serum thyroglobulin immediately before radioactive iodine therapy; 5 Px, prognosis. * p < 0.05.
Comparison of the diagnostic performance for response prediction between single cutoff thyroglobulin and scan-corrected thyroglobulin.
| Variables | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV 1 | NPV 2 | Accuracy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single cutoff D0Tg | 82.5 | 67.8 | 86.7 | 60.4 | 78.4 | <0.001 |
| Scan-corrected Tg | 90.8 | 64.4 | 86.7 | 73.4 | 83.4 |
1 PPV, positive predictive value; 2 NPV, negative predictive value; 3 D0Tg, serum thyroglobulin immediately before radioactive iodine therapy; 4 Tg, thyroglobulin.
Figure 2Prediction of the therapeutic response using scan-corrected thyroglobulin (Tg). (A) In patients having midline uptake and D0Tg above the cutoff level (5.1 ng/mL), the ratio Tg (D7Tg/D0Tg) is also above the cutoff level (49.2), and the patient showed an excellent response (ER) at the follow-up. (B) In patients having midline uptake and D0Tg above the cutoff level (3.7 ng/mL), the ratio Tg is below the cutoff level (5.75 ng/mL), and the patient showed non-ER at the follow-up. (C) Patients having midline uptake and D0Tg below the cutoff level (3.1 ng/mL). The patient showed ER at the follow-up. (D) Patients having no midline uptake or D0Tg above the cutoff level (3.2 ng/mL). This patient showed non-ER at the follow-up.