OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to predict the success of 131I ablation using preablative 99mTc pertechnetate salivary scintigraphy and a postablative dual 131I scan in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 168 DTC patients who underwent 131I ablation with preablative salivary scintigraphy and a postablative dual (early and delayed) 131I scan were enrolled. For salivary scintigraphy, the thyroid remnant uptake was visually assessed. For the dual 131I scan, the thyroid remnant to background uptake ratios (TBRs) on early and delayed scans were measured and the percentage change in TBR (TBRΔ) was calculated. RESULTS: Thyroid remnant uptake was seen in 69 (41%) patients on salivary scintigraphy and in 162 (96%) patients on the dual 131I scan. The success rate of ablation was higher in patients with negative remnant uptake on salivary scintigraphy (86%) than in patients with positive remnant uptake (58%, P=0.0001). The success rate of ablation was 100% in patients with no remnant uptake on both salivary scintigraphy and the dual 131I scan. The success rate of ablation was higher in patients with TBRΔ 0 or more than in patients with TBRΔ less than 0, irrespective of remnant uptake on salivary scintigraphy (91 vs. 70%, P=0.03, for patients without remnant uptake on salivary scintigraphy; 74 vs. 48%, P=0.05, for patients with remnant uptake on salivary scintigraphy). CONCLUSION: The success of thyroid remnant ablation in DTC can be predicted by the presence of remnant uptake on preablative 99mTc pertechnetate scintigraphy and change in remnant uptake on the postablative dual 131I scan.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to predict the success of 131I ablation using preablative 99mTc pertechnetate salivary scintigraphy and a postablative dual 131I scan in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 168 DTCpatients who underwent 131I ablation with preablative salivary scintigraphy and a postablative dual (early and delayed) 131I scan were enrolled. For salivary scintigraphy, the thyroid remnant uptake was visually assessed. For the dual 131I scan, the thyroid remnant to background uptake ratios (TBRs) on early and delayed scans were measured and the percentage change in TBR (TBRΔ) was calculated. RESULTS: Thyroid remnant uptake was seen in 69 (41%) patients on salivary scintigraphy and in 162 (96%) patients on the dual 131I scan. The success rate of ablation was higher in patients with negative remnant uptake on salivary scintigraphy (86%) than in patients with positive remnant uptake (58%, P=0.0001). The success rate of ablation was 100% in patients with no remnant uptake on both salivary scintigraphy and the dual 131I scan. The success rate of ablation was higher in patients with TBRΔ 0 or more than in patients with TBRΔ less than 0, irrespective of remnant uptake on salivary scintigraphy (91 vs. 70%, P=0.03, for patients without remnant uptake on salivary scintigraphy; 74 vs. 48%, P=0.05, for patients with remnant uptake on salivary scintigraphy). CONCLUSION: The success of thyroid remnant ablation in DTC can be predicted by the presence of remnant uptake on preablative 99mTc pertechnetate scintigraphy and change in remnant uptake on the postablative dual 131I scan.