| Literature DB >> 31970886 |
Miseon Kim1, Dong Hoon Suh2, Jin Young Choi3, Seul Lee2, Jae Ryul Bae2, Kidong Kim2, Jae Hong No2, Yong Beom Kim2,4.
Abstract
We aimed to discover cell line-specific overexpressed HOX genes responsible for chemoresistance and to identify the mechanisms behind HOX-induced cell line-specific chemoresistance in EOC. Ten HOX genes and eight EOC cell lines were tested for any cell line-specific overexpression that presents a mutually exclusive pattern. Cell viability was evaluated after treatment with cisplatin and/or siRNA for cell line-specific overexpressed HOX genes. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for HOXB9 was performed in 84 human EOC tissues. HOXA10 and HOXB9 were identified as cell line-specific overexpressed HOX genes for SKOV-3 and RMUG-S, respectively. Inhibiting the expression of cell line-specific HOX genes, but not of other HOX genes, significantly decreased cell viability. In SKOV-3 cells, cell viability decreased to 46.5% after initial 10 µM cisplatin treatment; however, there was no further decrease upon additional treatment with HOXA10 siRNA. In contrast, cell viability did not significantly decrease upon cisplatin treatment in RMUG-S cells, but decreased to 65.5% after additional treatment with HOXB9 siRNA. In both cell lines, inhibiting cell line-specific HOX expression enhanced apoptosis but suppressed the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers such as vimentin, MMP9, and Oct4. IHC analysis showed that platinum-resistant cancer tissues more frequently had high HOXB9 expression than platinum-sensitive cancer tissues. HOXB9, which is overexpressed in RMUG-S but not in SKOV-3 cells, appeared to be associated with cell line-specific platinum resistance in RMUG-S. Inhibiting HOXB9 overexpression in RMUG-S cells may effectively eliminate platinum-resistant ovarian cancer cells by facilitating apoptosis and inhibiting EMT.Entities:
Keywords: HOX gene; chemoresistance; ovarian cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31970886 PMCID: PMC7077590 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.14993
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Figure 2Image of immunohistochemical staining score (A) 0, (B) 1, (C) 2 and (D) 3 for HOXB9 in ovarian cancer tissues in ×40 and ×200 magnifications. (E) Progression‐free survival and (F) overall survival graphs by Kaplan‐Meier methods according to the degree of HOXB9 expression
Figure 1(A) Western blot analysis and (B) reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) for HOXA10 and HOXB9 expression in SKOV‐3 and RMUG‐S cell lines with/without siRNA. (C) Early and late apoptotic cells after treatment with 50 nmol/L HOXA10 and HOXB9 siRNAs for 48 h in each cell line (D) images of TUNEL assay after treatment with corresponding siRNAs to each cell line (E) Wound healing migration assay, (F) transwell invasion assay and (G) Western blot analysis after treatment with corresponding HOX siRNAs in each cell line