OBJECTIVE: To present 3 cases in which the presence of artifacts altered the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar field. METHODS: Clinical presentation and literature review. RESULTS: The first patient was a 49-year-old premenopausal woman with a spinal cord stimulator implanted in her lumbar spine. The implant increased the measured BMD in the lumbar region from osteopenia to normal range. The second patient was a 56-year-old man who had a DXA scan after he was administered oral and intravenous iodine-based contrast earlier the same day. The oral contrast in the patient's colon created a dense artifact, which overlapped the lumbar spine and adjacent soft tissue. The effect almost changed his DXA diagnosis from osteoporosis to osteopenia. The third patient was a 64-year-old woman who had undergone laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). A part of the LAGB system adjacent to lumbar vertebra 3 was mistakenly included as part of the vertebrae by the DXA scanner, causing an increase in the measured BMD. CONCLUSION: There are numerous artifacts that can alter DXA BMD measurement. It is important for providers who interpret DXA scans to be familiar with the potential effects of artifacts and how to adjust for their presence, since erroneous measurements can lead to incorrect decisions regarding treatment and follow-up.
OBJECTIVE: To present 3 cases in which the presence of artifacts altered the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar field. METHODS: Clinical presentation and literature review. RESULTS: The first patient was a 49-year-old premenopausal woman with a spinal cord stimulator implanted in her lumbar spine. The implant increased the measured BMD in the lumbar region from osteopenia to normal range. The second patient was a 56-year-old man who had a DXA scan after he was administered oral and intravenous iodine-based contrast earlier the same day. The oral contrast in the patient's colon created a dense artifact, which overlapped the lumbar spine and adjacent soft tissue. The effect almost changed his DXA diagnosis from osteoporosis to osteopenia. The third patient was a 64-year-old woman who had undergone laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). A part of the LAGB system adjacent to lumbar vertebra 3 was mistakenly included as part of the vertebrae by the DXA scanner, causing an increase in the measured BMD. CONCLUSION: There are numerous artifacts that can alter DXA BMD measurement. It is important for providers who interpret DXA scans to be familiar with the potential effects of artifacts and how to adjust for their presence, since erroneous measurements can lead to incorrect decisions regarding treatment and follow-up.
Authors: Sushilkumar K Sonavane; Christine O Menias; Kartikeya P Kantawala; Alampady K Shanbhogue; Srinivasa R Prasad; John C Eagon; Kumaresan Sandrasegaran Journal: Radiographics Date: 2012 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Annie W C Kung; Chih-Hsing Wu; Akira Itabashi; Joon Kiong Lee; Hyoung Moo Park; Yanling Zhao; Wing P Chan; David L Kendler; Edward S Leib; E Michael Lewiecki; John P Bilezikian; Sanford Baim Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2010-07-21 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: David L Kendler; Gary M Kiebzak; Catherine G Ambrose; C Dinu; Stephen Robertson; Peg Schmeer; Janet L Van Pelt Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2006-03-29 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: John A Kanis; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Helena Johansson; Anders Odén; Eugene V McCloskey Journal: Arch Osteoporos Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 2.617