Literature DB >> 16731437

Effect of diagnostic radioisotopes and radiographic contrast media on measurements of lumbar spine bone mineral density and body composition by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Alessandra Sala1, Colin Webber, Jacqueline Halton, Judy Morrison, Lesley Beaumont, Anna Zietak, Ronald Barr.   

Abstract

Since there is almost no information on whether the concomitant use of diagnostic radioisotopes and radiographic contrast media interferes with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), we investigated these potentially confounding effects. At routine scheduled radiographic follow-up, 40 patients previously treated for malignant lymphomas or solid tumors in Hamilton and Ottawa, Canada were evaluated, 10 in each of the following 4 categories of diagnostic procedure: (1) computed tomography (CT) with intravenous, iodine-based contrast (+/-oral contrast), (2) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium-based contrast, (3) gallium scan (GS), and (4) technetium bone scan (TBS). Whole body bone mineral content (WB-BMC) and lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS-BMD), total fat mass (TFM), and lean body mass (LBM) were measured by DXA immediately before and after the other radiological studies (on the same day) and then 7 days later. No statistically significant differences were found among WB-BMC, LS-BMD, TFM, and LBM Z-scores immediately before and after MRI, GS, TBS, and 7 days later. The DXA measurements performed immediately before and after CT showed statistically significant differences in WB-BMC (100% vs 124.5%, p<0.001), TFM (100% vs 75.4%, p<0.001), and LBM (100% vs 110%, p<0.001), resulting from the CT contrast agents compromising the precision of the DXA. The DXA results after 7 days were not statistically different from those at baseline. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry can be performed in association with other radiological techniques, with the exception of CT conducted with contrast within 1 week. This study provides information that applies not only to patients with cancer but to the general population undergoing diagnostic procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16731437     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2005.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  3 in total

1.  Development of a single-frequency bioimpedance prediction equation for fat-free mass in an adult Indigenous Australian population.

Authors:  J T Hughes; L J Maple-Brown; L S Piers; J Meerkin; K O'Dea; L C Ward
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Official position of the Brazilian Association of Bone Assessment and Metabolism (ABRASSO) on the evaluation of body composition by densitometry: part I (technical aspects)-general concepts, indications, acquisition, and analysis.

Authors:  Sergio Setsuo Maeda; Barbara Santarosa Emo Peters; Lígia Araújo Martini; Hannah Karen Moreira Antunes; Maria Cristina Gonzalez; Henrique Pierotti Arantes; Carla M Prado; Camila Lemos Pinto; Iana Mizumukai de Araújo; Francisco José Albuquerque de Paula; Joao Lindolfo Cunha Borges; Ben-Hur Albergaria; Marcela Ushida; Guilherme Cardenaz de Souza; Laura Maria Carvalho de Mendonça; Mirley do Prado; Marcelo de Medeiros Pinheiro
Journal:  Adv Rheumatol       Date:  2022-03-20

3.  ARTIFACTS AFFECTING DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY MEASUREMENTS.

Authors:  Andrew J Spiro; Thanh D Hoang; Mohamed K M Shakir
Journal:  AACE Clin Case Rep       Date:  2019-06-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.