Literature DB >> 31964306

The mere physical presence of another person reduces human autonomic responses to aversive sounds.

Yanyan Qi1,2,3, Martin J Herrmann1, Luisa Bell1, Anna Fackler1, Shihui Han4, Jürgen Deckert1, Grit Hein1.   

Abstract

Social animals show reduced physiological responses to aversive events if a conspecific is physically present. Although humans are innately social, it is unclear whether the mere physical presence of another person is sufficient to reduce human autonomic responses to aversive events. In our study, participants experienced aversive and neutral sounds alone (alone treatment) or with an unknown person that was physically present without providing active support. The present person was a member of the participants' ethnical group (ingroup treatment) or a different ethnical group (outgroup treatment), inspired by studies that have found an impact of similarity on social modulation effects. We measured skin conductance responses (SCRs) and collected subjective similarity and affect ratings. The mere presence of an ingroup or outgroup person significantly reduced SCRs to the aversive sounds compared with the alone condition, in particular in participants with high situational anxiety. Moreover, the effect was stronger if participants perceived the ingroup or outgroup person as dissimilar to themselves. Our results indicate that the mere presence of another person was sufficient to diminish autonomic responses to aversive events in humans, and thus verify the translational validity of basic social modulation effects across different species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anxiety; similarity; skin conductance responses; social modulation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31964306      PMCID: PMC7015327          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  52 in total

1.  The tie that binds? Coherence among emotion experience, behavior, and physiology.

Authors:  Iris B Mauss; Robert W Levenson; Loren McCarter; Frank H Wilhelm; James J Gross
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2005-06

Review 2.  Social learning of fear.

Authors:  Andreas Olsson; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  A picture's worth: partner photographs reduce experimentally induced pain.

Authors:  Sarah L Master; Naomi I Eisenberger; Shelley E Taylor; Bruce D Naliboff; David Shirinyan; Matthew D Lieberman
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-09-24

4.  Neural signals of vicarious extinction learning.

Authors:  Armita Golkar; Jan Haaker; Ida Selbing; Andreas Olsson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  The benefits of social buffering are maintained regardless of the stress level of the subject rat and enhanced by more conspecifics.

Authors:  Yasushi Kiyokawa; Kazuma Kawai; Yukari Takeuchi
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-05-26

Review 6.  Peripheral physiological responses to subliminally presented negative affective stimuli: A systematic review.

Authors:  Melanie M van der Ploeg; Jos F Brosschot; Anke Versluis; Bart Verkuil
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Perceived social support moderates the link between threat-related amygdala reactivity and trait anxiety.

Authors:  Luke W Hyde; Adam Gorka; Stephen B Manuck; Ahmad R Hariri
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Social buffering ameliorates conditioned fear responses in female rats.

Authors:  Akiko Ishii; Yasushi Kiyokawa; Yukari Takeuchi; Yuji Mori
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.587

9.  Sex-specific effects of social support on cortisol and subjective responses to acute psychological stress.

Authors:  C Kirschbaum; T Klauer; S H Filipp; D H Hellhammer
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.312

10.  Pain relief provided by an outgroup member enhances analgesia.

Authors:  Grit Hein; Jan B Engelmann; Philippe N Tobler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  7 in total

1.  Investigating the relationship of COVID-19 related stress and media consumption with schizotypy, depression, and anxiety in cross-sectional surveys repeated throughout the pandemic in Germany and the UK.

Authors:  Sarah Daimer; Lorenz L Mihatsch; Sharon A S Neufeld; Graham K Murray; Franziska Knolle
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Fear in groups: Increasing group size reduces perceptions of danger.

Authors:  Ellen Tedeschi; Sophia Armand; Anastasia Buyalskaya; Brian Silston; Dean Mobbs
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2021-10

3.  Shared Reality Can Reduce Stressor Reactivity.

Authors:  Megan R Goldring; Federica Pinelli; Niall Bolger; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-27

4.  The Loss of the Shared Space: Process Issues in Telepsychotherapy.

Authors:  Himani Kashyap; Jyothsna Chandur; Rajakumari P Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Psychol Med       Date:  2020-08-31

5.  Effects of social and emotional context on neural activation and synchrony during movie viewing.

Authors:  Sarah L Dziura; Junaid S Merchant; Diana Alkire; Adnan Rashid; Deena Shariq; Dustin Moraczewski; Elizabeth Redcay
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Social buffering of human fear is shaped by gender, social concern, and the presence of real vs virtual agents.

Authors:  Yanyan Qi; Dorothée Bruch; Philipp Krop; Martin J Herrmann; Marc E Latoschik; Jürgen Deckert; Grit Hein
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  The skin conductance response indicating pain relief is independent of self or social influence on pain.

Authors:  Marthe Gründahl; Leonie Retzlaff; Martin J Herrmann; Grit Hein; Marta Andreatta
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.348

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.