Literature DB >> 29842855

The benefits of social buffering are maintained regardless of the stress level of the subject rat and enhanced by more conspecifics.

Yasushi Kiyokawa1, Kazuma Kawai2, Yukari Takeuchi2.   

Abstract

Social buffering is a phenomenon in which the presence of an affiliative conspecific (associate) mitigates stress responses in a subject. We assessed the relationship between the stress level of subjects and the benefit of social buffering. In Experiment 1, subjects fear-conditioned using 0.15-mA, 0.45-mA, or 0.70-mA foot shocks were re-exposed to a conditioned stimulus (CS) either alone or with an associate on the day following fear conditioning. We found that behavioral responses were reduced by the presence of an associate. The intensity of this decrease was similar among all subjects. These results suggest that the intensity of social buffering was similar regardless of the stress level of the subject. The high stress subjects showed residual stress responses after receiving social buffering, indicating that the residual stress responses may have been resistant to social buffering. To further examine this, subjects fear-conditioned using 0.70-mA foot shocks were re-exposed to the CS either alone, with one associate, or with three associates in Experiment 2. We found that behavioral responses decreased as the number of associates increased. These results suggest that residual stress responses are further ameliorated when the number of associates increases. Therefore, the residual stress responses were also sensitive to buffering. Taken together, our data indicate that the benefits of social buffering are maintained regardless of the stress level of the subject rat and enhanced by more conspecifics.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fear conditioning; Group size; Rats; Shock intensity; Social buffering; Stress status

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29842855     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.05.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  7 in total

1.  Oxytocin receptor antagonist reverses the blunting effect of pair bonding on fear learning in monogamous prairie voles.

Authors:  Yu Hirota; Aki Arai; Larry J Young; Yoji Osako; Kazunari Yuri; Shinichi Mitsui
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.587

2.  Social Transmission and Buffering of Hippocampal Metaplasticity after Stress in Mice.

Authors:  I-Chen Lee; Ting-Hsuan Yu; Wen-Hsin Liu; Kuei-Sen Hsu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Systematic Input-Output Mapping Reveals Structural Plasticity of VTA Dopamine Neurons-Zona Incerta Loop Underlying the Social Buffering Effects in Learned Helplessness.

Authors:  Hongwei Cai; Pei Zhang; Guangjian Qi; Lijun Zhang; Tongxia Li; Ming Li; Xinyuan Lv; Jie Lei; Jie Ming; Bo Tian
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 5.590

4.  Social Buffering as a Tool for Improving Rodent Welfare.

Authors:  Melanie R Denommé; Georgia J Mason
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.706

5.  Fear in groups: Increasing group size reduces perceptions of danger.

Authors:  Ellen Tedeschi; Sophia Armand; Anastasia Buyalskaya; Brian Silston; Dean Mobbs
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2021-10

6.  The mere physical presence of another person reduces human autonomic responses to aversive sounds.

Authors:  Yanyan Qi; Martin J Herrmann; Luisa Bell; Anna Fackler; Shihui Han; Jürgen Deckert; Grit Hein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Familiarity modulates social approach toward stressed conspecifics in female rats.

Authors:  Morgan M Rogers-Carter; Anthony Djerdjaj; Amelia R Culp; Joshua A Elbaz; John P Christianson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.