Literature DB >> 27060333

Social buffering ameliorates conditioned fear responses in female rats.

Akiko Ishii1, Yasushi Kiyokawa2, Yukari Takeuchi1, Yuji Mori1.   

Abstract

The stress experienced by an animal is ameliorated when the animal is exposed to distressing stimuli along with a conspecific animal(s). This is known as social buffering. Previously, we found that the presence of an unfamiliar male rat induced social buffering and ameliorated conditioned fear responses of a male rat subjected to an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS). However, because our knowledge of social buffering is highly biased towards findings in male subjects, analyses using female subjects are crucial for comprehensively understanding the social buffering phenomenon. In the present studies, we assessed social buffering of conditioned fear responses in female rats. We found that the estrus cycle did not affect the intensity of the rats' fear responses to the CS or their degree of vigilance due to the presence of a conspecific animal. Based on these findings, we then assessed whether social buffering ameliorated conditioned fear responses in female rats without taking into account their estrus cycles. When fear conditioned female rats were exposed to the CS without the presence of a conspecific, they exhibited behavioral responses, including freezing, and elevated corticosterone levels. By contrast, the presence of an unfamiliar female rat suppressed these responses. Based on these findings, we conclude that social buffering can ameliorate conditioned fear responses in female rats.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Estrus cycle; Fear conditioning; Female; Sex difference; Social buffering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27060333     DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Behav        ISSN: 0018-506X            Impact factor:   3.587


  15 in total

Review 1.  The roots of empathy: Through the lens of rodent models.

Authors:  K Z Meyza; I Ben-Ami Bartal; M H Monfils; J B Panksepp; E Knapska
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 2.  An insular view of the social decision-making network.

Authors:  Morgan M Rogers-Carter; John P Christianson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Oxytocin receptor antagonist reverses the blunting effect of pair bonding on fear learning in monogamous prairie voles.

Authors:  Yu Hirota; Aki Arai; Larry J Young; Yoji Osako; Kazunari Yuri; Shinichi Mitsui
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 4.  Comparative studies of social buffering: A consideration of approaches, terminology, and pitfalls.

Authors:  Yasushi Kiyokawa; Michael B Hennessy
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 5.  Empathy for Distress in Humans and Rodents.

Authors:  Jun Chen
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 5.203

6.  The mere physical presence of another person reduces human autonomic responses to aversive sounds.

Authors:  Yanyan Qi; Martin J Herrmann; Luisa Bell; Anna Fackler; Shihui Han; Jürgen Deckert; Grit Hein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Developmental stress and social phenotypes: integrating neuroendocrine, behavioural and evolutionary perspectives.

Authors:  Karen A Spencer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  The right central amygdala shows greater activation in response to an auditory conditioned stimulus in male rats.

Authors:  Yasushi Kiyokawa; Daichi Takahashi; Yukari Takeuchi; Yuji Mori
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 1.267

9.  Freezing suppression by oxytocin in central amygdala allows alternate defensive behaviours and mother-pup interactions.

Authors:  Elizabeth Rickenbacher; Rosemarie E Perry; Regina M Sullivan; Marta A Moita
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 10.  Social stress models in rodents: Towards enhanced validity.

Authors:  J M Koolhaas; S F de Boer; B Buwalda; P Meerlo
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2016-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.