| Literature DB >> 31963681 |
Tereza Filipi1,2, Zuzana Hermanova1,2, Jana Tureckova1, Ondrej Vanatko1, And Miroslava Anderova1.
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurological disease, which is characterized by the degeneration of motor neurons in the motor cortex and the spinal cord and subsequently by muscle atrophy. To date, numerous gene mutations have been linked to both sporadic and familial ALS, but the effort of many experimental groups to develop a suitable therapy has not, as of yet, proven successful. The original focus was on the degenerating motor neurons, when researchers tried to understand the pathological mechanisms that cause their slow death. However, it was soon discovered that ALS is a complicated and diverse pathology, where not only neurons, but also other cell types, play a crucial role via the so-called non-cell autonomous effect, which strongly deteriorates neuronal conditions. Subsequently, variable glia-based in vitro and in vivo models of ALS were established and used for brand-new experimental and clinical approaches. Such a shift towards glia soon bore its fruit in the form of several clinical studies, which more or less successfully tried to ward the unfavourable prognosis of ALS progression off. In this review, we aimed to summarize current knowledge regarding the involvement of each glial cell type in the progression of ALS, currently available treatments, and to provide an overview of diverse clinical trials covering pharmacological approaches, gene, and cell therapies.Entities:
Keywords: ALS; NG2-glia; astrocytes; clinical trials; microglia; oligodendrocytes; pericytes
Year: 2020 PMID: 31963681 PMCID: PMC7020059 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9010261
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Summary of representative SOD1 animal models of ALS.
| Species | Protein/Gene | Protein Function | Mutation | Promoter | CNS Overexpression (Fold) | Symptoms Onset (Weeks) | Survival (Weeks) | Phenotype | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mouse | Cu-Zn SOD/ | ROS detoxification | D90A | human SOD1 | 20 | 52 | 61 | ALS-like phenotype, progressive MN deficit, axonal degeneration, paralysis, gliosis, SOD1 inclusions, mitochondrial vacuolation | |
| G37R | human SOD1 | 4–12 | 15–17 | 25–29 | [ | ||||
| G85R | human SOD1 | 0.2–1 | 35–43 | 37–45 | [ | ||||
| G86R | human SOD1 | n/a | 13–17 | 17 | [ | ||||
| G93A | human SOD1 | 8 | 12 | 40–50 | [ | ||||
| G127X | human SOD1 | 0.5–1 | 35 | 36 | [ | ||||
| H46 | human SOD1 | n/a | 20 | 24 | [ | ||||
| H46R/H48Q | human SOD1 | n/a | 17–26 | n/a | [ | ||||
| T116X | human SOD1 | n/a | 41 | 43 | [ | ||||
| L126X | human SOD1 | 0–0.5 | 28–36 | n/a | [ | ||||
| L126delTT | human SOD1 | 2 | 17 | 18 | [ | ||||
| Rat | Cu-Zn SOD/ | ROS detoxification | H46R | human SOD1 | 6 | 20 | 24 | ALS-like | [ |
| G93A | human SOD1 | ||||||||
| Zebrafish | Cu-Zn SOD/ | ROS detoxification | G93R | zebrafish SOD1 | 3 | 48 | 72–108 | Muscle athrophy, MN loss, œsurvival | [ |
| Drosophila | Cu-Zn SOD/ | ROS detoxification | A4V | 3–5 | 4 | normal | glia activation, no MN loss | [ | |
| G85R | 1–2 | 2 | normal | ||||||
| C. elegans | Cu-Zn SOD/ | ROS detoxification | G85R | 4 days | decreased | SOD1 aggregates, no MN loss | [ | ||
| H46R/H48Q | 4 days | ||||||||
| Dog. | Cu-Zn SOD/ | ROS detoxification | E40K/E40K | endogenous | 1 | 5 years | 6–9 months from symptom onset | DM, axonal lesions, functional deficit in UMN, LMN | [ |
ALS—amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ROS—reactive oxygen species; SOD—superoxid dismutase; UMN—uper motor neurons; LMN—lower motor neurons; DM—degenerative myelopathy.
Summary of representative TDP-43 animal models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
| Species | Protein/Gene | Protein Function | Mutation | Promoter | CNS Overexpression (Fold) | Symptoms Onset (Weeks) | Survival (Weeks) | ph-TDP-43 | Inclusions | Phenotype | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ubiquitous expression | |||||||||||
| Mouse | TDP-43/ | RNA metabolism | A315T | mPrP | 3 | 13 | 22 | TDP-43+ Ub+ | MN degeneration, gliosis | [ | |
| A315T | mPrP | 4 | 4 | 37.5 | + | TDP-43+ Ub+ | gliosis, muscle atrophy | [ | |||
| A315T | human TDP43 (BAC) | 3 | 7 months | >12 months | TDP-43+ Ub+ | motor and cognitive phenotype, NMJ denervation, gliosis | [ | ||||
| G348C | human TDP43 (BAC) | 3 | 7 months | >12 months | TDP-43+ Ub+ | ||||||
| M337V | mPrP | 2.5 | 3 | 10 | + | TDP-43+ Ub+ | NII/NCI, motor dysfunction, gliosis, mitochondria aggregation | [ | |||
| M337V | mPrP | 1–1.5 | 10 months | >17 months | - | - | motor dysfunction, ↓ NMJ integrity, axonopathy, gliosis | [ | |||
| Q331K | mPrP | 1–1.5 | 3 months | >17 months | - | - | |||||
| Rat | TDP-43/ | RNA metabolism | M337V | human TDP43 (BAC) | high | 3 | 4–8 | MN degeneration, muscle atrophy | [ | ||
| Zebrafish | TDP-43/ | RNA metabolism | A315T | motor defects, axonopathy, aberrant branching | [ | ||||||
| Drosophila | TDP-43/ | RNA metabolism | Q331K | lethal | motor deffects | [ | |||||
| M337V | lethal | ||||||||||
| G348C | abberant branching | [ | |||||||||
| A315T | |||||||||||
| C. elegans | TDP-43/ | RNA metabolism | M337V | locomotor deffects, paralysis, MN degeneration | [ | ||||||
| A315T | |||||||||||
| Neuron specific expression | |||||||||||
| Mouse | TDP-43/ | RNA metabolism | ΔNLS | CaMK2 | 7.9 | 1 | + | motor and cognitive phenotype, gliosis | [ | ||
| M337V | Thy1.2 | 1.7 | 11 days | 3 | + | TDP-43+ Ub+ | motor defects, MN degeneration, gliosis | [ | |||
| Rat | TDP-43/ | RNA metabolism | iTDP43-M337V | Chat | 2 | 60 days | TDP-43+ Ub+ | MN degeneration, | [ | ||
TDP-43—TAR DNA-binding protein 43; mPrP—murine prion protein; ph-TDP-43—phospho-TDP-43; CaMK2—Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II; Chat—choline acetyltransferase; NEFH—neurofilament heavy polypeptide; NMJ—neuromuscular junction.
Figure 1During ALS astrocytes undergo pathological changes, which affect their physiological functions and lead to the reduction of motor neuron (MN) survival. ALS astrocytes have decreased levels of EAAT2, which are cleaved by Caspase-3 and create aggregates within astrocytic nucleus. Therefore, the number of EAAT2 receptors on membranes is reduced and the astrocytic ability to buffer glutamate (GLU) from synapses is impaired. Increased levels of GLU cause excessive neuronal stimulation that damages MNs via the process termed excitotoxicity. The nuclear aggregates not only damage MNs but also astrocytes themselves, as they cause gene expression disruption and subsequently, mitochondrial damage. Moreover, astrocytes secrete a range of inflammatory soluble factors in response to the intracellular damage (interleukins, cytokines...), which strongly reduce MN survival via the so-called non-cell autonomous effect.
Figure 2M2 and M1 microglia release certain molecules that are able to influence the survival of MNs. The molecules and their effect depend on the phenotype of microglia. M1 are toxic, while M2 microglia are protective.
Figure 3Compounds were divided into groups according to their effect, as described in clinical studies. In the category of anti-glutamatergic both Ceftriaxone [286] and Talampanel [287] failed. Another category of drugs are compounds that are thought to have anti-oxidative properties. Both Coenzyme Q10 [288,289] and Creatine [290,291,292,293,294] have failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy. Tirasemtiv and Reldesemtiv are able to regulate the release of calcium from the regulatory troponin complex and thus sensitize the muscle to calcium. Several trials assessed the efficacy of Tirasemtiv in human ALS patients. From all the studies [295,296,297,298], only one [298] managed to show statistical significance on two out of five secondary endpoints. Based on the results, a large-scale follow up study was launched but failed to demonstrate efficacy in all of its endpoints [299]. Efficacy of Reldesemtiv was assessed in a single Phase II trial. Although, this trial failed in its primary endpoint for all dose groups, patients showed a non-significant 27% reduction of decline in SVC. Moreover, all groups compared to the placebo, showed a significant 25% change in ALSFRS-R slope [300]. Most compounds used, are believed to have either immunomodulatory/anti-inflammatory/antiapoptotic and/or neuroprotective properties. Most of these compounds failed to demonstrate statistical significance in all of the studies´ endpoints. Celecoxib—[301], as part of a combined treatment with Creatine [302], Dexpramipexole [286,303], Erythropoietin [304,305], Glatiramer Acetate [306,307], Lithium Carbonate [308,309,310,311], Minocycline ([312,313,314] as part of a combined treatment with Creatine [302]), NP001 [315,316], Olesoxime [317], Omigapil (TCH-346) [318], and Valproic acid [319]. Xaliproden has managed to succeed in 1 out of 8 endpoints in one of two trials [320], however, both trials failed on their primary endpoints [320,321]. Trials of two compounds—Acthar gel (released in press in 2016) and Pioglitazone [322], were prematurely terminated due to potential risk to patients (Acthar gel) and futility (Pioglitazone). Other drugs are considered to have unique effects among the compounds assessed. Trials of Ozanezumab have failed to show clinical efficacy [323]. Another compound tested, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), has failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy in three separate trials [324,325,326], even though one of the studies [325] succeeded in three out of three of its secondary endpoints. Another compound, Rasagiline, failed to show clinical efficacy in a single trial [327], however, post-hoc analysis has revealed a significant reduction of ALS progression in patients with an initial ALSFRS-R slope greater than one (patients with faster ALS progression).
Currently tested compounds and compounds used in studies that are recruiting participants.
| Compound | Endpoints § | Outcome of Previous Studies in ALS Patients | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TUDCA | ALSFRS-R | success | [ |
| Fasudil | survival, ALSFRS-R | - | [ |
| Pimozide | ALSFRS-R, SVC | failure | [ |
| Methylcobalamin | survival, ALSFRS-R | success | [ |
| Deferiprone | CAFS | Mixed * | [ |
| Cu(II)ATSM | ALSFRS-R, ECAS, SVC | success | - |
| Arimoclomol | CAFS | Failure ** | [ |
| Ibudilast | ALSFRS-R, ALSAQ-5 | success | - |
| RNS60 | SVC, ALSFRS-R | failure | [ |
§—primary endpoints, secondary endpoints in studies which primarily assessed safety and tolerability. *—study reported statistically significant differences in ALSFRS-R and body-mass index (BMI) decline between the three-month treatment-free period compared to the first three months of treatment. **—this study has shown a favorable trend in decreasing the decline of ALSFRS-R, FEV6 (Forced Expiratory Volume in six seconds), and CAFS, although this trend was not statistically significant.