Literature DB >> 30636701

Ultra-high-dose methylcobalamin in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a long-term phase II/III randomised controlled study.

Ryuji Kaji1, Takashi Imai2,3, Yasuo Iwasaki4, Koichi Okamoto5, Masanori Nakagawa6, Yasuo Ohashi7, Takao Takase8, Takahisa Hanada8, Hiroki Shimizu8, Kunio Tashiro9, Shigeki Kuzuhara10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intramuscular ultra-high-dose methylcobalamin in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
METHODS: 373 patients with ALS (El Escorial definite or probable; laboratory-supported probable; duration ≤36 months) were randomly assigned to placebo, 25 mg or 50 mg of methylcobalamin groups. The primary endpoints were the time interval to primary events (death or full ventilation support) and changes in the Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) score from baseline to week 182. Efficacy was also evaluated using post-hoc analyses in patients diagnosed early (entered ≤12 months after symptom onset).
RESULTS: No significant differences were detected in either primary endpoint (minimal p value=0.087). However, post-hoc analyses of methylcobalamin-treated patients diagnosed and entered early (≤12 months' duration) showed longer time intervals to the primary event (p<0.025) and less decreases in the ALSFRS-R score (p<0.025) than the placebo group. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar and low in all groups.
CONCLUSION: Although ultra-high-dose methylcobalamin did not show significant efficacy in the whole cohort, this treatment may prolong survival and retard symptomatic progression without major side effects if started early. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00444613. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30636701      PMCID: PMC6581107          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


Introduction

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an intractable neurodegenerative disease characterised by motor neuron degeneration typically presenting with muscle weakness and atrophy.1 Respiratory failure due to muscle weakness is the major cause of death. Without mechanical ventilation support, patients succumb to this disease within 3–6 years from its onset. The widely used drug for ALS, riluzole, provides modest prolongation of survival (2–3 months), but no beneficial effects were shown on muscle strength and little on bulbar function.2 Moreover, safety concerns, such as liver dysfunction, exist.2 Edaravone has been approved for retarding the clinical deterioration of ALS, but its effect on the survival is unknown.3 The deficiency in vitamin B12 is associated with central nervous system lesions including subacute combined degeneration of the cord, indicating an important function of B12 in the spinal cord and the brain. Methylcobalamin, an active vitamin B12, used in Japan to treat peripheral neuropathy and megaloblastic anaemia, is a potential candidate for ALS treatment. It functions as a coenzyme for homocysteine remethylation as a methyl donor, and inhibits neuronal degeneration by decreasing levels of homocysteine, the accumulation of which contributes to neuronal degeneration in patients with ALS.4 5 It also activates extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 and Akt to induce neurite outgrowth and prolong neuronal survival.6 Cyanates/cyanide conjugates of B12 are not acting as methyl donor and have not been proven to show these effects. Preclinical studies have reported that methylcobalamin protects neurons against glutamate neurotoxicity7 8 and promotes nerve regeneration.9 It has also been shown that intraperitoneal ultra-high dosage inhibits disease progression in a wobbler mouse.10 Oral administration in high dose would be ineffective because of the limited availability of the gastric intrinsic factor for its absorption. Clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of intramuscular ultra-high-dose methylcobalamin on compound muscle action potentials.11 Moreover, a small-sized study has demonstrated that, if started early in the disease course, ultra-high-dose methylcobalamin prolongs ventilation-free survival.12 Based on these results, we conducted a long-term phase II/III clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intramuscular ultra-high-dose methylcobalamin in Japanese patients with ALS.

Methods

This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted from December 2006 to March 2014 at 51 sites in Japan.

Patients

Patients satisfying the following inclusion criteria were eligible: outpatients aged 20 years or older; clinically definite, clinically probable, or clinically probable, laboratory-supported ALS diagnosis according to the revised El Escorial criteria (Airlie House criteria)13; duration from the symptom onset ≤3 years; stage 1 or 2 of the Japanese ALS severity classification14 (scores range from 1 to 5: 1 denotes no difficulty in daily living and working; 2, ability to live or work unaided; 3, requirement of assistance in daily living due to incapability of managing social life; 4, requirement of constant assistance in all aspects of daily living; and 5, bedridden status requiring a life support system); and Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) score15 decrease by 1–3 points during the 12-week observation period. The definition of onset was the initial time that the patient recognised weakness or any other motor symptoms other than twitching or cramping of muscles. The key exclusion criteria were tracheostomy or previous use of non-invasive ventilation, per cent-predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) ≤60%, multiple conduction blocks, new start or change in the dose or administration of riluzole after the observation period began, or serious cardiovascular, renal, hepatic disease or any haematological changes suggestive of B12 deficiency. This report follows the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines.

Randomisation and treatment

The patients were centrally randomised to the placebo or 25 mg or 50 mg methylcobalamin groups using the order of registration with a minimisation algorithm to balance the following factors: onset type (bulbar or upper or lower motor neuron onset), riluzole coadministration, ALSFRS-R score before study enrolment, and the change in this score during the observation period. Allocated drugs were intramuscularly administered twice per week starting from the end of the observation period (12 weeks) and continued for 182 weeks in a manner that the patients and their caregivers could not see the formulation colour (the active ingredients in methylcobalamin colour the formulation red). Changes in riluzole administration were not allowed. Edaravone was not used in any of the subjects.

Outcome measures

The primary endpoints were the time to primary events and the change in ALSFRS-R score from baseline to week 182. The primary events were defined as death by any cause or invasive or non-invasive ventilation support ≥22 hours per day due to ALS progression. On the occurrence of a primary event, treatment was discontinued. ALSFRS-R quantitatively evaluates the progression of disability by measuring respiratory function and physical ability in daily living. The secondary endpoints included muscle strength assessed using the manual muscle test (Medical Research Council Scale), physical functional status measured with the Norris Scale,16 respiratory function assessed using %FVC, grip strength, and the quality of life evaluated using the ALS Assessment Questionnaire-40.17 The primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were evaluated using post-hoc analyses in a subgroup of patients diagnosed early (at screening ≤12 months after symptom onset) based on previous studies.11 12 Drug safety was evaluated on the incidence of adverse events and the results of laboratory tests, vital signs and an ECG. Events due to the progression of ALS were not counted as adverse events; however, all deaths were counted as adverse events regardless of cause. All assessments, except for ECG, were conducted on weeks 0, 4 and 16, and at 12-week intervals thereafter to week 172, and on week 182. For patients who discontinued therapy due to the primary event, the last assessment was conducted within 4 weeks of the day the event occurred. Different investigators were responsible for drug administration, as well as efficacy, ALSFRS-R and safety assessments, to maintain blindness throughout the study, because the active ingredients in methylcobalamin colour urine red.

Statistical analysis

The sample size was originally set at 200 primary events in 300 patients (100 per group) for 130 weeks to detect a significant difference in the HR for the time to primary event between the groups at a one-sided significance level of 1%, with a power of 90%, based on an estimated HR of the primary events of 0.5–0.6 and effect size in the ALSFRS-R analysis of 0.3–0.4. However, the sample size and study duration were revised while maintaining blindness to 360 patients (120 per group) and 182 weeks because of a low rate of primary events. Two interim analyses by an independent data monitoring committee were performed to assess safety and futility. The efficacy analyses were conducted using a population analysis for those patients who received methylcobalamin and had evaluable primary endpoint data based on the intention-to-treat principle. This was called the full analysis set. The safety analyses were made on a safety data set composed of those patients who were evaluated for safety. Missing data from patients who discontinued methylcobalamin after a primary event were imputed with the final evaluation data after discontinuation. Methylcobalamin efficacy and dose–response relationships were simultaneously evaluated using contrast coefficients to compare placebo with 50 mg and placebo with all methylcobalamin groups combined, respectively. The time interval to the primary event was compared among groups using log-rank scores, and the changes in the ALSFRS-R score and secondary endpoint measures were evaluated using the Wilcoxon score (patients who died or whose data after a primary event were not collected within 28 days from the event were ranked worst). The p values for the primary test were adjusted for multiplicity, with the statistical analysis plan described in online supplementary e-appendix. In addition, the Cox proportional hazards model with backward elimination for the placebo group was used with variables including the interval between symptom onset and diagnosis (≤12 months, >12 months), gender, %FVC (<90%, ≥90%) and several other variables to explore prognostic factors for events post hoc. Analyses were performed using SAS V.9.3 software.

Results

A total of 373 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to placebo or 25 mg or 50 mg methylcobalamin groups (124, 124 and 125 patients, respectively; figure 1). Exclusion of 3 patients (1 and 2 patients in the placebo and 50 mg groups, respectively) for not satisfying the diagnostic criteria yielded 370 patients. The study was completed by 260 patients, with 113 patients withdrawn because they declined to participate.
Figure 1

Patient flow.

Patient flow. The baseline demographic and disease characteristics were similar among the groups, without significant differences (table 1). Approximately half the patients were diagnosed as having clinically probable ALS (46.2%) and had upper motor neuron-onset ALS (49.5%). Most of the patients (89.7%) were being treated with riluzole at the screening. The number of patients with diabetes was 53 (16 in placebo, 18 in 25 mg and 19 in 50 mg groups), 6 of whom received metformin, which could potentially affect B12 levels. There were however no changes in haematological data in this study.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of study participants

Placebo(n=123)MethylcobalaminOverall(n=370)
25 mg(n=124)50 mg(n=123)
Sex
 Male71 (57.7)81 (65.3)71 (57.7)223 (60.3)
 Female52 (42.3)43 (34.7)52 (42.3)147 (39.7)
Age, years
 Mean±SD62.2±10.760.8±10.162.4±9.661.8±10.1
 <6561 (49.6)77 (62.1)65 (52.8)203 (54.9)
 ≥6562 (50.4)47 (37.9)58 (47.2)167 (45.1)
ALSFRS-R score at screening (mean±SD)42.1±3.541.7±3.841.9±3.841.9±3.7
ALSFRS-R at enrolment (mean±SD)40.1±3.539.8±4.039.9±4.040.0±3.8
Time lag from symptom onset to diagnosis, months (mean±SD)19.6±8.119.2±8.219.7±7.819.5±8.0
%FVC at screening (mean±SD)97.40±18.2293.75±17.2693.99±15.9795.04±17.21
%FVC at enrolment (mean±SD)92.83±20.0789.98±17.4589.39±17.5590.74±18.41
%FVC change during the observation period (mean±SD)−4.57±10.63−3.76±9.36−4.59±8.77−4.31±9.60
Onset type
 Bulbar30 (24.4)29 (23.4)28 (22.8)87 (23.5)
 UMN60 (48.8)62 (50.0)61 (49.6)183 (49.5)
 LMN33 (26.8)33 (26.6)34 (27.6)100 (27.0)
ALS disease type
 Sporadic117 (95.1)122 (98.4)118 (95.9)357 (96.5)
 Familial6 (4.9)2 (1.6)5 (4.1)13 (3.5)
 Riluzole coadministration during the observation period110 (89.4)112 (90.3)110 (89.4)332 (89.7)
Diagnosis*
 Clinically definite ALS33 (26.8)43 (34.7)49 (39.8)125 (33.8)
 Clinically probable ALS62 (50.4)60 (48.4)49 (39.8)171 (46.2)
 Clinically probable, laboratory-supported ALS28 (22.8)21 (16.9)25 (20.3)74 (20.0)
ALS severity at enrolment
 Stage I14 (11.4)20 (16.1)17 (13.8)51 (13.8)
 Stage II109 (88.6)104 (83.9)106 (86.2)319 (86.2)
ALSFRS-R score change during the observation period
 −142 (34.1)45 (36.3)42 (34.1)129 (34.9)
 −246 (37.4)41 (33.1)45 (36.6)132 (35.7)
 −335 (28.5)38 (30.6)36 (29.3)109 (29.5)

Data were compared among groups using one-way analysis of variance for continuous, χ2 test for nominal and Kruskal-Wallis test for ordinal variables. Unless otherwise stated, values represent the number followed by the percentage of participants.

*Diagnoses were made according to the revised El Escorial criteria (Airlie House criteria).

ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ALSFRS-R, Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale; %FVC, per cent-predicted forced vital capacity; LMN, lower motor neuron; UMN, upper motor neuron.

Baseline characteristics of study participants Data were compared among groups using one-way analysis of variance for continuous, χ2 test for nominal and Kruskal-Wallis test for ordinal variables. Unless otherwise stated, values represent the number followed by the percentage of participants. *Diagnoses were made according to the revised El Escorial criteria (Airlie House criteria). ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ALSFRS-R, Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale; %FVC, per cent-predicted forced vital capacity; LMN, lower motor neuron; UMN, upper motor neuron.

Efficacy

Significant differences were not detected for either primary endpoint; the minimal crude p value was 0.09 for the change in the ALSFRS-R score, and its adjusted value was 0.19 (table 2). The time to the primary event was slightly prolonged in the active treatment groups (HR [95% CI]: 0.83 [0.58 to 1.20] for 25 mg and 0.92 [0.65 to 1.32] for 50 mg methylcobalamin groups). The median time to the primary event was 880 for placebo, 1147 for 25 mg and 954 days for 50 mg methylcobalamin groups (figure 2A). The median change in the ALSFRS-R score from baseline to week 182 decreased in relation to the allocated dose: −24.0 for placebo, −22.0 for 25 mg and −21.0 for 50 mg methylcobalamin groups (figure 2B).
Table 2

Primary efficacy endpoints analysed in two patient populations

(A) Analysis conducted using data from all participants
 Primary efficacy endpointsPlacebo (n=123)MethylcobalaminCrude p value(comparison with placebo)Adjusted p value(comparison with placebo)
25 mg (n=124)50 mg (n=123)50 mgMethylcobalamin50 mgMethylcobalamin
Time to the primary event*, day
 Median (95% CI)880 (678 to 12171147 (819 to –)954 (777 to –)0.33†0.20†0.15†0.13†
 First quartile (25%) (95% CI)465 (363 to 538)499 (392 to 610)503 (377 to 627)
 Third quartile (75%) (95% CI)–‡–‡
 HR vs the placebo group in each active group (95% CI)0.83 (0.58 to 1.20)0.92 (0.65 to 1.32)
 HR vs the placebo group in total active group (95% CI)0.88 (0.64 to 1.20)
Change in ALSFRS-R score
 Patients, n123124122
 Median (min, max)−24.0 (−42, −1)−22.0 (−42, 2)−21.0 (−39, 1)0.15§0.09§0.18§0.19§
 First quartile (25%)−30.0−30.5−27.0
 Third quartile (75%)−16.0−12.5−10.0

*Primary events defined as death for any cause or invasive or non-invasive ventilation support for ≥22 hours due to ALS progression.

†Intergroup difference analysed using log-rank score.

‡Third quartile of the primary event-free survival was not calculable in any of the groups.

§Intergroup difference analysed using Wilcoxon score.

¶Third quartile of time to the primary event was not calculable in the 50 mg methylcobalamin group.

ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ALSFRS-R, Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale.

Figure 2

Primary efficacy endpoints in all patients (A, B) and the subgroup of patients diagnosed early (≤12 months after symptom onset) (C, D). ALSFRS-R, Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale.

Primary efficacy endpoints in all patients (A, B) and the subgroup of patients diagnosed early (≤12 months after symptom onset) (C, D). ALSFRS-R, Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale. Primary efficacy endpoints analysed in two patient populations *Primary events defined as death for any cause or invasive or non-invasive ventilation support for ≥22 hours due to ALS progression. †Intergroup difference analysed using log-rank score. ‡Third quartile of the primary event-free survival was not calculable in any of the groups. §Intergroup difference analysed using Wilcoxon score. ¶Third quartile of time to the primary event was not calculable in the 50 mg methylcobalamin group. ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ALSFRS-R, Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale. For the secondary endpoints, the median change in manual muscle test and the Norris Scale scores from baseline to week 182 decreased in a dose-dependent manner, although this decrease was not significantly different among the groups (online supplementary table e-1).

Patients diagnosed early (duration ≤12 months)

The post-hoc analysis of the subgroup of patients diagnosed early (diagnosed with ALS ≤12 months after symptom onset) demonstrated a significant dose–response-dependent prolongation in time to the primary event (HR [95% CI]: 0.64 [0.38 to 1.09] for 25 mg [p=0.01] and 0.50 [0.27 to 0.93] for 50 mg [p=0.01] methylcobalamin groups). The median time to the primary event (95% CI) was 570 (465 to 720) days for placebo, 1087 (564 to –) days for 25 mg, and 1197 (609 to –) days for 50 mg methylcobalamin groups (table 2, figure 2C). The change in the ALSFRS-R score also decreased in a dose-dependent manner (the p value for 25 mg was 0.01 and was 0.003 for 50 mg methylcobalamin compared with placebo; figure 2D). To confirm the validity of the results, the time-related changes in the efficacies on the primary event and on ALSFRS-R scores were analysed; methylcobalamin exhibited efficacy or a trend towards efficacy on primary events in patients diagnosed ≤12 months after symptom onset. Additionally, efficacy or a trend towards efficacy on ALSFRS-R scores was frequently observed in the first 24 months after symptom onset (online supplementary tables e-2 and e-3). Among the secondary endpoints, a dose–response inhibition in worsening was shown in the Norris Scale score (p values: 0.008 for 25 mg and 0.005 for 50 mg) and %FVC (p values of 0.004 for 25 mg and <0.001 for 50 mg) (online supplementary table e-4).

Patients with other poor prognostic factors

Applying the Cox proportional hazards model with backward elimination to data in the placebo group determined the following poor prognostic factors: diagnostic interval >12 months, being male, %FVC being <90% and being without riluzole (online supplementary table e-5). Methylcobalamin at both 25 mg and 50 mg tended to reduce the HR in men and %FVC <90% (HR, 0.76–0.77; online supplementary table e-6). The decreased ALSFRS-R score (95% CI) in the 50 mg group was 4.3 (0.7 to 7.9; p=0.095) for men and 4.5 (0.9 to 8.1; p=0.020) for %FVC <90% (online supplementary table e-7).

Safety

Adverse events were reported by more than 97% of patients in each group. Treatment-related adverse events were reported with a similar incidence of 4.1% (5/123), 7.3% (9/124) and 5.7% (7/123) in the placebo, 25 mg and 50 mg methylcobalamin groups, respectively. The incidence of serious adverse events was also similar in the placebo, 25 mg and 50 mg methylcobalamin groups: 64.2%, 62.1% and 65.0%, respectively. Of the six patients who died of causes other than ALS progression, the cause of one death in the 50 mg methylcobalamin group was due to cardiac arrest following myocardial infarction or arrhythmia, and was considered unrelated to the medication based on the patient’s history. There were no clinically significant changes in the results of laboratory tests, vital signs or ECGs among groups. Statistical details are available on request.

Classification of evidence

The research aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term ultra-high-dose methylcobalamin (25 mg and 50 mg) in Japanese patients with ALS and the efficacy in patients whose ALS was diagnosed early. Methylcobalamin was not found to be significantly superior to placebo in the whole cohort. However, in patients diagnosed early (≤12 months after symptom onset), this study provides post-hoc class II evidence that ultra-high-dose methylcobalamin prolongs time to death or ventilation support (HR [95% CI]: 0.64 [0.38 to 1.09] for 25 mg group and 0.50 [0.27 to 0.93] for 50 mg group; p=0.01 for placebo vs both methylcobalamin groups combined) and decreased ALSFRS-R scores (p=0.003 for 50 mg and p=0.01 for all methylcobalamin groups) in a dose-responsive manner. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar and low in all groups.

Discussion

This long-term study evaluated the efficacy and safety of high-dose methylcobalamin (25 mg and 50 mg administered intramuscularly twice per week) in patients with ALS using the survival (or being fully bound to respirator) as the primary event. Because of the time and expenses incurred, it is becoming more and more difficult to conduct large-scale, long-term studies assessing the survival such as in the present study. Although the superiority of methylcobalamin over placebo in terms of either the time to primary events or the change in ALSFRS-R score was not confirmed when data from all participants were analysed, a post-hoc analysis using only the subgroup of patients diagnosed early (diagnosed ≤12 months after symptom onset) demonstrated the efficacy of methylcobalamin. This subgroup suggested dose–response relationships for both survival prolongation and functional measures. Despite the lack of a statistically significant difference compared with placebo as a whole, deterioration in ALSFRS-R, Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) and Norris scales scores tended to be less pronounced with the higher dose of methylcobalamin. These findings warrant a pivotal phase III clinical trial of ultra-high-dose methylcobalamin exploring its effect on ALSFRS-R for a shorter period (16 weeks), recruiting patients with less than 12 months’ duration after onset (Clinical Trial of Ultra-high Dose Methylcobalamin for ALS (JETALS), ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03548311). The length of time between the first ALS symptom and the initial clinic visit correlated with patient survival, likely because those with rapid progression tend to be captured early by the current diagnostic criteria.18 Those participants with less time between symptom onset and initial clinical visit exhibited shorter survival times. In the present study, the percentage of patients in the placebo group who experienced a primary event (95% CI) was 75.6% (60.1% to 90.1%) for those with a duration of ALS ≤12 months and 51.8% (38.8% to 64.7%) for those >12 months. The median change in the ALSFRS-R scores from baseline to week 182 was −26.5 for those ≤12 months and −21.0 for those >12 months after symptom onset. Besides those with early diagnosis (ie, rapid disease progression), a similar trend towards poor prognosis regarding time to primary events (or survival) was found in the other two subgroups: being male and having %FVC <90% (online supplementary table e-6). Interestingly, in these three subgroups, methylcobalamin also tended to show a positive influence in the survival and in other endpoints (ALSFRS-R, Norris Scale score and %FVC; online supplementary table e-7). These results could reinforce the efficacy of methylcobalamin in ALS. Provided that findings in favour of methylcobalamin were obtained only in these subgroups and not in the whole cohort, it may be difficult to evaluate the efficacy of a therapeutic drug in patients with slow and variable progression of the disease. Alternatively, methylcobalamin may be more efficacious when treatment is started at an early stage of ALS. A recent clinical trial of erythropoietin recruiting patients up to 18 months after onset showed a tendency for longer survival and less decrease of ALSFRS-R score up to 6 months.19 Baumann and colleagues20 demonstrated that the half-life of lower motor neurons is approximately 1 year and that these motor neurons decay exponentially in ALS. This means that the number of lower motor neurons is already halved at 1 year after symptom onset. Therefore, in modifying the progression of ALS, a therapeutic agent started late in the progression has only a fraction of the normal lower motor neuron population remaining, with a small number of lower motor neurons sustaining a large number of muscle fibres. As previously suggested21 the reason so many clinical trials may fail despite the promising results of animal studies is partly due to the late treatment start in humans compared with that in animal models. The El Escorial criteria up to the clinically probable, laboratory-supported level may not be sensitive enough to detect patients with ALS in the early stage of the disease for participation in clinical trials, in contrast to the detection criteria used in animal studies. In clinical settings, the average delay from symptom onset to an ALS diagnosis is approximately 1 year, and a delay of ≤12 months accounts for about 40% of patients.21–23 The newly developed Awaji criteria,24 incorporated into the El Escorial criteria, may shorten the delay to 9 months.25–28 In this study, methylcobalamin showed prominent prolongation of survival with slower functional decline in patients diagnosed early (≤12 months after symptom onset). Currently, approximately half of the ALS population could benefit from methylcobalamin treatment using the revised El Escorial diagnostic criteria; however, if the use of the Awaji criteria becomes the standard practice, most patients could benefit from this therapy, if the promise is fulfilled in the currently ongoing JETALS study, which uses the Awaji criteria for entry for the first time. The inconvenience of intramuscular injections may be overcome by allowing injections by patients or their caregivers, which is currently employed in the JETALS study. Further limitations of this trial should be noted. First, the strict criteria for study inclusion may have excluded some patients with ALS, which has heterogeneous pathogeneses. Second, although post-hoc analysis identified only one subgroup of patients, additional factors may influence the efficacy and safety profile of methylcobalamin. Third, we did not examine higher doses (>50 mg) for dose finding, and it is possible that these mega-doses might have even better outcome. These potential factors may warrant future analyses in other study cohorts such as JETALS. In conclusion, ultra-high-dose methylcobalamin was not found to be significantly superior to placebo. However, ultra-high-dose methylcobalamin therapy may improve the prognosis of patients with ALS if administered early in the disease course. Therapeutic agents that failed in the previous clinical trials could be reanalysed for potential efficacy in ALS, taking into account the duration of the disease at the start of therapy. Criteria enabling earlier diagnosis and a change in the physician’s attitude towards offering an early diagnosis and treatment should yield better future outcomes for the patients than ever.
  27 in total

Review 1.  El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  B R Brooks; R G Miller; M Swash; T L Munsat
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord       Date:  2000-12

2.  Effect of ultrahigh-dose methylcobalamin on compound muscle action potentials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a double-blind controlled study.

Authors:  R Kaji; M Kodama; A Imamura; T Hashida; N Kohara; M Ishizu; K Inui; J Kimura
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  Diagnostic timelines and delays in diagnosing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

Authors:  Sabrina Paganoni; Eric A Macklin; Alexandra Lee; Alyssa Murphy; Judith Chang; Amanda Zipf; Merit Cudkowicz; Nazem Atassi
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.092

Review 4.  Clinical trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: why so many negative trials and how can trials be improved?

Authors:  Hiroshi Mitsumoto; Benjamin R Brooks; Vincenzo Silani
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 44.182

5.  Protective effects of methylcobalamin, a vitamin B12 analog, against glutamate-induced neurotoxicity in retinal cell culture.

Authors:  M Kikuchi; S Kashii; Y Honda; Y Tamura; K Kaneda; A Akaike
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Prognosis and epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Analysis of a clinic population, 1997-2011.

Authors:  Kim Traxinger; Crystal Kelly; Brent A Johnson; Robert H Lyles; Jonathan D Glass
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2013-08

7.  Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis severity scale.

Authors:  A D Hillel; R M Miller; K Yorkston; E McDonald; F H Norris; N Konikow
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Elevated plasma homocysteine levels in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  S Zoccolella; I L Simone; P Lamberti; V Samarelli; R Tortelli; L Serlenga; G Logroscino
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Methylcobalamin increases Erk1/2 and Akt activities through the methylation cycle and promotes nerve regeneration in a rat sciatic nerve injury model.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Okada; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Ko Temporin; Michio Okamoto; Yusuke Kuroda; Hisao Moritomo; Tsuyoshi Murase; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 5.330

10.  Erythropoietin in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a multicentre, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, phase III study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lauria; Eleonora Dalla Bella; Giovanni Antonini; Giuseppe Borghero; Margherita Capasso; Claudia Caponnetto; Adriano Chiò; Massimo Corbo; Roberto Eleopra; Raffaella Fazio; Massimiliano Filosto; Fabio Giannini; Enrico Granieri; Vincenzo La Bella; Giancarlo Logroscino; Jessica Mandrioli; Letizia Mazzini; Maria Rosaria Monsurrò; Gabriele Mora; Vladimiro Pietrini; Rocco Quatrale; Romana Rizzi; Fabrizio Salvi; Gabriele Siciliano; Gianni Sorarù; Paolo Volanti; Irene Tramacere; Graziella Filippini
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacotherapy for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Review of Approved and Upcoming Agents.

Authors:  Stephen A Johnson; Ton Fang; Fabiola De Marchi; Dylan Neel; Donatienne Van Weehaeghe; James D Berry; Sabrina Paganoni
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 11.431

2.  Efficacy and Safety of Ultrahigh-Dose Methylcobalamin in Early-Stage Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ryosuke Oki; Yuishin Izumi; Koji Fujita; Ryosuke Miyamoto; Hiroyuki Nodera; Yasutaka Sato; Satoshi Sakaguchi; Hiroshi Nokihara; Kazuaki Kanai; Taiji Tsunemi; Nobutaka Hattori; Yuki Hatanaka; Masahiro Sonoo; Naoki Atsuta; Gen Sobue; Toshio Shimizu; Kazumoto Shibuya; Ken Ikeda; Osamu Kano; Kazuto Nishinaka; Yasuhiro Kojima; Masaya Oda; Kiyonobu Komai; Hitoshi Kikuchi; Nobuo Kohara; Makoto Urushitani; Yoshiaki Nakayama; Hidefumi Ito; Makiko Nagai; Kazutoshi Nishiyama; Daisuke Kuzume; Shun Shimohama; Takayoshi Shimohata; Koji Abe; Tomohiko Ishihara; Osamu Onodera; Sagiri Isose; Nobuyuki Araki; Mitsuya Morita; Kazuyuki Noda; Tatsushi Toda; Hirofumi Maruyama; Hirokazu Furuya; Satoshi Teramukai; Tatsuo Kagimura; Kensuke Noma; Hiroaki Yanagawa; Satoshi Kuwabara; Ryuji Kaji
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 29.907

Review 3.  The clinical trial landscape in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Heike J Wobst; Korrie L Mack; Dean G Brown; Nicholas J Brandon; James Shorter
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 12.944

4.  Challenges and opportunities for Multi-National Investigator-Initiated clinical trials for ALS: European and United States collaborations.

Authors:  Paul Lingor; Jan C Koch; Jeffrey M Statland; Sumaira Hussain; Christiane Hennecke; Joanne Wuu; Thomas Langbein; Raees Ahmed; René Günther; Benjamin Ilse; Jan Kassubek; Katja Kollewe; Josua Kuttler; Andreas Leha; Teresa Lengenfeld; Thomas Meyer; Christoph Neuwirth; Ralf Tostmann; Michael Benatar
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 5.  Glial Cells-The Strategic Targets in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Treatment.

Authors:  Tereza Filipi; Zuzana Hermanova; Jana Tureckova; Ondrej Vanatko; And Miroslava Anderova
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-18       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Critical design considerations for time-to-event endpoints in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinical trials.

Authors:  Ruben P A van Eijk; Stavros Nikolakopoulos; Kit C B Roes; Bas M Middelkoop; Toby A Ferguson; Pamela J Shaw; P Nigel Leigh; Ammar Al-Chalabi; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Leonard H van den Berg
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 7.  Improving clinical trial outcomes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Matthew C Kiernan; Steve Vucic; Kevin Talbot; Christopher J McDermott; Orla Hardiman; Jeremy M Shefner; Ammar Al-Chalabi; William Huynh; Merit Cudkowicz; Paul Talman; Leonard H Van den Berg; Thanuja Dharmadasa; Paul Wicks; Claire Reilly; Martin R Turner
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 8.  Nutrient Effects on Motor Neurons and the Risk of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Polina S Goncharova; Tatiana K Davydova; Tatiana E Popova; Maxim A Novitsky; Marina M Petrova; Oksana A Gavrilyuk; Mustafa Al-Zamil; Natalia G Zhukova; Regina F Nasyrova; Natalia A Shnayder
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Vitamin B12 Reduces TDP-43 Toxicity by Alleviating Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction.

Authors:  Yu-Mi Jeon; Younghwi Kwon; Shinrye Lee; Seyeon Kim; Myungjin Jo; Seongsoo Lee; Sang Ryong Kim; Kiyoung Kim; Hyung-Jun Kim
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-29

Review 10.  A perspective on therapies for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: can disease progression be curbed?

Authors:  Xiaojiao Xu; Dingding Shen; Yining Gao; Qinming Zhou; You Ni; Huanyu Meng; Hongqin Shi; Weidong Le; Shengdi Chen; Sheng Chen
Journal:  Transl Neurodegener       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 8.014

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.