| Literature DB >> 31963462 |
Asaf Olshinka1,2, Dean Ad-El1,2, Elena Didkovski2,3, Shirel Weiss2,4, Rinat Ankri5, Nitza Goldenberg-Cohen4,6,7, Dror Fixler5.
Abstract
Diffusion reflectance spectroscopy measurements targeted with gold nanoparticles (GNPs) can identify residual cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in excision borders. Human SCC specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin to identify tumor borders, and reflected onto an unstained deparaffinized section. Diffusion reflection of three sites (normal and SCC) were measured before and after GNPs targeting. Hyperspectral imaging showed a mean of 2.5 sites with tumor per specimen and 1.2 tumor-free (p < 0.05, t-test). GNPs were detected in 25/30 tumor sites (sensitivity 83.3%, false-negative rate 16.6%) and 12/30 non-tumor sites (specificity 60%, false-positive rate 40%). This study verifies the use of nanotechnology in identifying SCC tumor margins. Diffusion reflection scanning has high sensitivity for detecting the residual tumor.Entities:
Keywords: diffusion reflection; epidermal growth factor receptor; gold nanoparticles; hyperspectral imaging; squamous cell carcinoma
Year: 2020 PMID: 31963462 PMCID: PMC7014005 DOI: 10.3390/ma13020447
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Histological findings of SCC in H and E-stained slide. Note the invasion of dermis by atypical keratinocytes with squamous eddies and pearls and dyskeratosis in the tumor (arrow) and the normal tissue (2 arrows).
Figure 2Characterization of GNRs. (a) Optical properties of the GNRs: ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy of bare GNRs and anti-EGFR coated GNRs. The resulting absorption peak was 670 nm. (b) Transmission electron microscopy image of the GNRs. Average dimensions were 25 × 11 ± 2.2 nm (n = 10). (c) Optical properties of the GNSs: ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy of anti-EGFR coated GNSs. The resulting absorption peak was 530 nm. (d) Transmission electron microscopy image of the GNRs. Average dimensions were 20 ± 4.3 nm (n = 8). (e) Schematic diagram of the GNRs synthesis process and their coating with m-PEG (85%) and COOH-PEG (15%), which is followed by a covalent conjugation to anti-EGFR. (f) Zeta potential and dynamic light scattering (DLS) size measurements (at 250 °C) of bare GNRs and anti-EGFR coated GNRs coated. The significant difference that was obtained (by zeta potential, DLS, and UV-vis spectroscopy) following coating, which demonstrates the efficiency of the chemical coating.
Figure 3Schematic view of the air scanning electron microscope (airSEM) (a) and an imaging station operating principle (b). The two visualizing modalities are combined onto one platform. The sample is shuttled between the optical microscope and airSEM, which provides accurate navigation and continuation of magnification of the region of interest (ROI).
Figure 4Hyperspectral image of the SCC specimen after staining with EGFR-conjugated GNPs. The location of the GNRs are marked in red.
Figure 5Reflectance spectra values in three tumor sites and three tumor-free sites. Focused view of second peak wavelength of the particle measured in the graph. Note the values in the area of the SCC.
Figure 6GNP-stained slide viewed with a high resolution (X19K) scanning electron microscope (airSEM™). A significantly lower density of GNPs can be seen in the tumor-free tissue (A) in comparison to the SCC-containing tissue (B).