| Literature DB >> 35774196 |
Qing Zhang1,2, Dan Hou1, Xueying Wen1, Mengyu Xin1, Ziling Li1, Lihong Wu1, Janak L Pathak1.
Abstract
Early diagnosis and treatment of oral cancer are vital for patient survival. Since the oral cavity accommodates the second largest and most diverse microbiome community after the gut, the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches with low invasiveness and minimal damage to surrounding tissues are keys to preventing clinical intervention-related infections. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are widely used in the research of cancer diagnosis and therapy due to their excellent properties such as surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, surface plasma resonance, controlled synthesis, the plasticity of surface morphology, biological safety, and stability. AuNPs had been used in oral cancer detection reagents, tumor-targeted therapy, photothermal therapy, photodynamic therapy, and other combination therapies for oral cancer. AuNPs-based noninvasive diagnosis and precise treatments further reduce the clinical intervention-related infections. This review is focused on the recent advances in research and application of AuNPs for early screening, diagnostic typing, drug delivery, photothermal therapy, radiotherapy sensitivity treatment, and combination therapy of oral cancer. Distinctive reports from the literature are summarized to highlight the latest advances in the development and application of AuNPs in oral cancer diagnosis and therapy. Finally, this review points out the challenges and prospects of possible applications of AuNPs in oral cancer diagnosis and therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Cancer therapy; Diagnosis; Gold nanomaterials; Oral cancer; Theranostics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35774196 PMCID: PMC9237953 DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100333
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mater Today Bio ISSN: 2590-0064
Fig. 1AuNPs with various morphologies. Ⅰ. TEM images of the AuNPs: gold nanospheres (a), gold nano-octahedras (b), gold arrow-headed (c), gold nanorods (d), and gold long nanorods (e). Source: Reprinted with permission from Ref. [64]. Copyright 2015, with permission from Elsevier. Ⅱ. TEM images of gold nanorods (NRs) (a), nanoshells (NSs) (b), and nanocages (NCs) (c); Ⅲ. Photothermal properties of PEGylated gold NRs, NSs, and NCs. (a) Temperature heating curves and (b) infrared thermal images for gold NRs, NSs, and NCs under 808 nm laser irradiation; (c) Heating and cooling curves of the above gold NRs, NSs, and NCs, which were irradiated by an 808 laser for 10 min, after that the laser was switched off. Ⅳ: In vivo phototherapeutic evaluation of AuNPs. (a) Biodistribution of gold NRs, NSs, and NCs in mouse organs; (b) Infrared thermal images of PBS, gold NRs, NSs, and NCs intravenously injected into a mouse tumor model under laser irradiation; (c) the tumor growth curves after being treated with various groups. (d) In vitro photos of the tumor after treatment. Source: Reprinted with permission from Ref. [65]. Copyright 2019, with permission from Elsevier. Ⅴ: Core-shell structure mesoporous silica-coated AuNPs (MS-AuNPs). (a) TEM of the nanoparticles (b), Extinction spectra of AuNPs and MS-AuNPs (c), Photostability measurement of time-resolved surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) spectra of solid MS-AuNPs (d), Three representative SERS spectra at selected irradiation times in panel (c). Source: Reprinted with permission from Ref. [57]. Copyright 2017, with permission from ACS. Ⅵ: Biofunctionalization and biomedical applications of AuNPs based gap-enhanced Raman tags. Source: Reprinted with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright 2020, with permission from ivyspring.
AuNPs developed for early screening and prevention of oral cancer.
| Nanomaterial | Size (nm) | Principle | Sample/target | Effect | Diagnosis ability in cancer vs control group | Differences in abnormal vs normal group | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AuNSs | 13.6–17.2 | SPR | Saliva/OPN | Limit of detection ↑ | 0.02 vs 0.14 | / | [ |
| AuNRs | 13.72 × 49.73 | SERS | Exfoliative cells/CAL-27 | Specificity↑ | 100% vs 60% | / | [ |
| AuNPs | 15 | SERS | Saliva/spectrum | Potential to detect peaks | / | New peaks at 1097 and 1627 cm-1 in the cancer group | [ |
| AuNPs | 20 | SERS | Saliva/(S100P) mRNA | S100P mRNA detection limited | 10 nM (S100P) mRNA | Three times higher in cancer group | [ |
| AuNCs | 15 | OCT | Hamster/cheek pouch tumor | Visualization of tumor sites | / | OCT and DvOCT signal inversion | [ |
| AuNPs | 70 | OCT | Hamster/cheek pouch tumor | Pinpointed pathological structures of early-stage oral cancer | / | Increase optical scattering intensity 33% | [ |
| AuNRs | 15 × 50 | DR | OSCC | Sensitivity and specificity significant increase | Sensitivity 100%, specificity 89% | / | [ |
Fig. 2Early, sensitive, noninvasive, and rapid cancer screening based on AuNRs: (Ⅰ) The schematic diagram showed the preparation of SERS substrate and the SERS detection of exfoliated cells obtained from oral cancer patients; (Ⅱ) TEM images of AuNRs; (Ⅲ) the plasmonic paper preparation and the color changes of AuNR solution before and after exposure; (Ⅳ, Ⅴ) The Raman spectra detected from the two different cells (normal cells, oral keratinocyte, and cancerous cultured cells) on the plasmonic paper and bare paper; (Ⅵ) Comparison of SERS signal intensity ratio of oral exfoliated cells; (Ⅶ、Ⅷ) Scatter plot of Raman signal intensity ratio tested from the different treated group. Source: Reprinted from Ref. [95] Copyright 2014, with permission from Elsevier.
AuNPs designed for the diagnosis and staging of oral cancer.
| Type | Size (nm) | Principle | Sample | Purpose | Result | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AuNRs | Major axis 55 | SERS | Sliced tissues | Discriminate benign from malignant oral lesions | The significantly lower intensity in the benign group | [ |
| AuNPs | 35 | SERS | Cell lines HOC 313 clone 8 and HSC 3 | Distinguish between cancerous and noncancerous cells | [ | |
| AuNPs | 55 | SERS | Serum | Develop new diagnoses method to detect OSCC | Sensitivity 80.7%, specificity 84.1%, and | [ |
| AuNPs | 55 | SERS | Serum | Detect the tumor stages and histologic classification of OSCC | accuracy 85.9% | [ |
| AuNRs | Major axis 25 | AirSEM & DR | OSCC tissue sections | Determine tumor margins | Accuracy margins of 1 mm | [ |
| AuNPs | 60 | NIR absorption imaging | Oral cancer cell lysate | Specific and quantitative analysis | Rapid and quantitative detection of oral cancer cells | [ |
Fig. 3Diagnosis of oral cancer based on AuNPs. Ⅰ. (a) The SEM images of the AuNPs. (b) The UV–vis absorption of the AuNPs and the AuNPs with serum. (c) Raman spectra of blank, serum, and AuNPs. Ⅱ. (a) The normalized mean SERS spectra of the different tumor size groups (T1, T2, T3, and T4). (b) The normalized average SERS spectra of subtracted, T1–2 and T3–4. (c) The histogram of discrimination scores of T1–2 and T3–4. Source: Reprinted with permission from Ref. [112]. Republished with permission of 2018 International Journal of Nanomedicine. Ⅲ. SERS of blood serum based on AuNPs for tumor stages detection and histologic grades classification of OSCC. (a) Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining for OSCC can identify tumors, boundaries, and normal sites ( × 40). (b) higher magnification ( × 100). (c) the airSEM image of the same tumor area (a) tumor, (b) border, and (c) normal sites. Ⅳ. The higher magnification airSEM images of the different sites (a–c) in the same area. From the tumor to the healthy site, the concentration of nanoparticles gradually decreases. Source: Reprinted with permission from Ref. [110]. Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2016, ACS.
AuNPs fabricated for oral cancer treatment.
| Type | Treatment strategies | Combination with | Cell line/model | Result | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AuNPs | Anti-angiogenic and anti-metastatic | Anti-angiogenic drug quinacrine | H-357 cells/xenograft mice model | Compared with quinacrine and/or AuNPs, mice exposed to AuNPs-based drugs simultaneously gained weight and significantly reduced tumor volume. | [ |
| AuNPs | Reverse multidrug resistance | Folate and bilirubin | KB-ChR-8-5 cells/tumor xenograft | Targeted therapy and reduce drug side effects | [ |
| AuNPs | PTT and chemotherapy | Conjugated to DOX through pH-sensitive and resistant linkers | OSCC (HSC-3) | The apoptotic indices of combination group, single DOX, and single AuNPs is 33.3, 12.6, and 19.3 respectively. | [ |
| AuNPs | Induce cell apoptosis | Mouse anti-human programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) | OSCC | Induce apoptosis of SCC-25 oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. | [ |
| AuNPs | Cause apoptosis and death of the CSCs | Quinacrine | Cancer stem cells (CSCs) | Caused apoptosis through modulating replication fork. The positive apoptosis-related protein Bax increased (6.1 times) and the negative apoptosis-related protein Bcl-XL decreased (by 5 times). | [ |
| AuNPs | Chemotherapy and radiotherapy | Cetuximab and cisplatin-conjugated | OSCC | Combination therapy improves radiotherapy sensitivity. The sensitization enhancement ratio was calculated as 1.2 and 1.9, for AuNPs and AuNP + Cetuximab, respectively. | [ |
| AuNPs | Selectively induce necrosis and apoptosis | / | Gingival fibroblasts and dysplastic keratinocytes | AuNPs induced selective toxic effects against dysplastic cells and induced antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. | [ |
| AuNRs | PTT | Trehalose | human OSCC cell line/tumor mouse model | Precise treatment, at 6 weeks, tumor volume in the PBS group was 6-fold larger than that in the treatment group. | [ |
| AuNRs | PTT | Folate | human oral epidermoid cancer cells (KB cells) | Target and precise treatment, in the laser combined with AuNPs treatment group, cell death reached 56%. | [ |
| AuNPs | PTT and radiotherapy | Folate | KB cells | Combination of PTT and radiotherapy led to the highest early apoptotic ratio of 27.76%. | [ |
| AuNPs | PTT and radiotherapy | Gold-coated iron oxide nanoparticles | KB cells | Multimodal cancer therapy improved the apoptosis of cancer cells, in the combinatorial treatment group, the cell viability substantially decreased to 19%. | [ |
| AuNFs | PTT and chemotherapy | Coated with two layers of silica | CAL27 | A combination of PTT and chemotherapy has better potential in the treatment of oral tumors. | [ |
| AuNRs | PTT and PDT | Conjugated with Rose Bengal | CAL27/DMBA-induced hamster tumor model | Combined PDT-PTT therapy resulted in 95.5% tumor suppression at day 10, compared with 46.5% and 65.5% for PDT and PTT alone. | [ |
| AuNRs | PTT and gene therapy | Coated with siRNA oligos targeting BAG3 | CAL-27 | PTT effect was enhanced by inhibition of heat shock response-related proteins. In the combination group, tumor volume decreased to 39.5% on day 18 compared with 79.5% in the gene therapy group alone. | [ |
| AuNPs | PTT and chemotherapy | Conjugated with podoplanin (PDPN) antibody- and doxorubicin (DOX)- | CAL27 | Show the synergetic effect of PTT and chemotherapy. The combination group had the highest inhibitory efficiency of 82.6% compared with 51% in the drug group alone. | [ |
| AuNPs | Photothermal-chemical-radiotherapy | Alginate hydrogel co-loaded with cisplatin and AuNPs | KB cells | Develop a multi-functional platform combining photothermal-chemical-radiotherapy. The gene expression in trimodal therapy group up-regulation of Bax pro-apoptotic factor (by 4.5-fold) and the down-regulation of Bcl-2 anti-apoptotic factor (by 0.3-fold). | [ |
| Ultrafine | Modulating microenvironment | / | Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) | Blocking dominant cells in the microenvironment to eradicate tumors | [ |
| AuNPs | PTT and PDT | Black phosphorous nanosheets and cisplatin | OSCC | Effectively inhibit the metastasis and growth of OSCC, Combination therapy can improve the overall survival rate of golden hamsters. | [ |
| AuNPs | Gum Arabic-encapsulated | OTSCC | As a promising carrier for chemotherapies to diminish intratumoral hypoxia-stimulated resistance | [ |
Fig. 4Combined chemotherapy and PTT based on AuNRs in the human OSCC. Ⅰ. The illustration of the synthesis and chemo-photothermal cancer therapy of PDPN antibody-AuNPs-doxorubicin. Ⅱ. In vivo antitumor effect and biological distribution of PDPN antibody-AuNPs -doxorubicin in a xenograft tumor model. (A) Thermal images of tumors after treatment with saline, free DOX, AuNPs, and (PDPN Ab)-AuNP-DOX, followed by laser irradiation. (B) the temperature curve of mouse tumor after being treated with different groups. (C) The excised solid tumors image and (D) tumor volume changes of different treatment groups. (E) DOX levels were detected in different organs of mice after DOX and (PDPN Ab)-AuNP-DOX were injected into the tail vein at an equivalent DOX dose. Source: Reprinted from Ref. [131] Copyright 2020, with permission from Futuremedicine).
Fig. 5Combined gene therapy and photothermal therapy PTT based on AuNRs in the human OSCC. Ⅰ. Schematic design of the preparation of Au NRs-siRNA and application in oral cancer PTT therapy. Ⅱ. Au NRs-siRNA inhibited tumor growth in the xenograft model after irradiation by laser. (a) Average percentage growth of tumors in different groups. (b) The excised solid tumors image from the different groups after treatment 18 days. The expression of BAG3 (c) and apoptotic cells (d) is determined by immunochemistry and TUNEL assay after 24 h treated with different groups. Source: Reprinted from Ref. [130] Copyright 2016, with permission from Elsevier).
Fig. 6Scheme of AuNPs for diagnostic and therapeutic applications in oral cancer. CT: chemotherapy, GT: gene therapy.