Literature DB >> 31960902

Mathematical modeling of the 'inoculum effect': six applicable models and the MIC advancement point concept.

Jessica R Salas1, Majid Jaberi-Douraki2,3, Xuesong Wen3,4, Victoriya V Volkova1,5.   

Abstract

Antimicrobial treatment regimens against bacterial pathogens are designed using the drug's minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) measured at a bacterial density of 5.7 log10(colony-forming units (CFU)/mL) in vitro. However, MIC changes with pathogen density, which varies among infectious diseases and during treatment. Incorporating this into treatment design requires realistic mathematical models of the relationships. We compared the MIC-density relationships for Gram-negative Escherichia coli and non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica and Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumonia (for n = 4 drug-susceptible strains per (sub)species and 1-8 log10(CFU/mL) densities), for antimicrobial classes with bactericidal activity against the (sub)species: β-lactams (ceftriaxone and oxacillin), fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin), aminoglycosides (gentamicin), glycopeptides (vancomycin) and oxazolidinones (linezolid). Fitting six candidate mathematical models to the log2(MIC) vs. log10(CFU/mL) curves did not identify one model best capturing the relationships across the pathogen-antimicrobial combinations. Gompertz and logistic models (rather than a previously proposed Michaelis-Menten model) fitted best most often. Importantly, the bacterial density after which the MIC sharply increases (an MIC advancement-point density) and that density's intra-(sub)species range evidently depended on the antimicrobial mechanism of action. Capturing these dependencies for the disease-pathogen-antimicrobial combination could help determine the MICs for which bacterial densities are most informative for treatment regimen design. © FEMS 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Escherichia colizzm321990 ; zzm321990 Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica; zzm321990 Staphylococcus aureuszzm321990 ; zzm321990 Streptococcus pneumoniaezzm321990 ; antibiotics; antimicrobial pharmacodynamics; antimicrobials; inoculum effect; minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC); non-typhoidal Salmonella

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31960902      PMCID: PMC7317156          DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnaa012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett        ISSN: 0378-1097            Impact factor:   2.742


  57 in total

1.  Concentrations of bacteria in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  W E Feldman
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 2.  The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic approach to a rational dosage regimen for antibiotics.

Authors:  P L Toutain; J R E del Castillo; A Bousquet-Mélou
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.534

3.  Pharmacodynamic functions: a multiparameter approach to the design of antibiotic treatment regimens.

Authors:  Roland R Regoes; Camilla Wiuff; Renata M Zappala; Kim N Garner; Fernando Baquero; Bruce R Levin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  A dynamic view of the spread and intracellular distribution of Salmonella enterica.

Authors:  Pietro Mastroeni; Andrew Grant; Olivier Restif; Duncan Maskell
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  An explanation for the effect of inoculum size on MIC and the growth/no growth interface.

Authors:  Eva Bidlas; Tingting Du; Ronald J W Lambert
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 5.277

6.  Modulation of chemical dermal absorption by 14 natural products: a quantitative structure permeation analysis of components often found in topical preparations.

Authors:  Faqir Muhammad; Majid Jaberi-Douraki; Damião Pergentino de Sousa; Jim E Riviere
Journal:  Cutan Ocul Toxicol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 1.820

Review 7.  Roxithromycin: review of its antimicrobial activity.

Authors:  A Bryskier
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Impact of high-inoculum Staphylococcus aureus on the activities of nafcillin, vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin, alone and in combination with gentamicin, in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Kerry L LaPlante; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  The oxazolidinone linezolid inhibits initiation of protein synthesis in bacteria.

Authors:  S M Swaney; H Aoki; M C Ganoza; D L Shinabarger
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Pharmacodynamics of moxifloxacin against a high inoculum of Escherichia coli in an in vitro infection model.

Authors:  Renu Singh; Kimberly R Ledesma; Kai-Tai Chang; Jing-Guo Hou; Randall A Prince; Vincent H Tam
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  3 in total

1.  A New Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model To Characterize the Inoculum Effect of Acinetobacter baumannii on Polymyxin B In Vitro.

Authors:  Grace Akrong; Alexia Chauzy; Vincent Aranzana-Climent; Mathilde Lacroix; Luc Deroche; Laure Prouvensier; Julien M Buyck; William Couet; Sandrine Marchand
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.938

2.  Validation of a Worst-Case Scenario Method Adapted to the Healthcare Environment for Testing the Antibacterial Effect of Brass Surfaces and Implementation on Hospital Antibiotic-Resistant Strains.

Authors:  Emilie Dauvergne; Corinne Lacquemant; Crespin Adjidé; Catherine Mullié
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-12

3.  Bistable Bacterial Growth Dynamics in the Presence of Antimicrobial Agents.

Authors:  Nelly Frenkel; Ron Saar Dover; Eve Titon; Yechiel Shai; Vered Rom-Kedar
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.