Literature DB >> 15388418

Pharmacodynamic functions: a multiparameter approach to the design of antibiotic treatment regimens.

Roland R Regoes1, Camilla Wiuff, Renata M Zappala, Kim N Garner, Fernando Baquero, Bruce R Levin.   

Abstract

There is a complex quantitative relationship between the concentrations of antibiotics and the growth and death rates of bacteria. Despite this complexity, in most cases only a single pharmacodynamic parameter, the MIC of the drug, is employed for the rational development of antibiotic treatment regimens. In this report, we use a mathematical model based on a Hill function-which we call the pharmacodynamic function and which is related to previously published E(max) models-to describe the relationship between the bacterial net growth rates and the concentrations of antibiotics of five different classes: ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, streptomycin, and rifampin. Using Escherichia coli O18:K1:H7, we illustrate how precise estimates of the four parameters of the pharmacodynamic function can be obtained from in vitro time-kill data. We show that, in addition to their respective MICs, these antibiotics differ in the values of the other pharmacodynamic parameters. Using a computer simulation of antibiotic treatment in vivo, we demonstrate that, as a consequence of differences in pharmacodynamic parameters, such as the steepness of the Hill function and the minimum bacterial net growth rate attained at high antibiotic concentrations, there can be profound differences in the microbiological efficacy of antibiotics with identical MICs. We discuss the clinical implications and limitations of these results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15388418      PMCID: PMC521919          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.48.10.3670-3676.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  55 in total

Review 1.  Predicting antibacterial response from pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles.

Authors:  D P Nicolau
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 2.  Rational dosing of antibiotics: the use of plasma concentrations versus tissue concentrations.

Authors:  Ping Liu; Markus Müller; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 3.  Animal model pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: a critical review.

Authors:  D Andes; W A Craig
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.283

4.  Microbial pharmacodynamics of piperacillin in neutropenic mice of systematic infection due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  J G Zhi; C H Nightingale; R Quintiliani
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1988-08

5.  Comparative study with enoxacin and netilmicin in a pharmacodynamic model to determine importance of ratio of antibiotic peak concentration to MIC for bactericidal activity and emergence of resistance.

Authors:  J Blaser; B B Stone; M C Groner; S H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Pharmacodynamics of fluoroquinolones.

Authors:  A Dalhoff
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Population pharmacokinetics and use of Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate currently recommended dosing regimens of ciprofloxacin in adult patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  M J Montgomery; P M Beringer; A Aminimanizani; S G Louie; B J Shapiro; R Jelliffe; M A Gill
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  General method for site-directed mutagenesis in Escherichia coli O18ac:K1:H7: deletion of the inducible superoxide dismutase gene, sodA, does not diminish bacteremia in neonatal rats.

Authors:  C A Bloch; G M Thorne; F M Ausubel
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Comparative antibiotic dose-effect relations at several dosing intervals in murine pneumonitis and thigh-infection models.

Authors:  J E Leggett; B Fantin; S Ebert; K Totsuka; B Vogelman; W Calame; H Mattie; W A Craig
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Ampicillin susceptibility and ampicillin-induced killing rate of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  I P Thonus; P Fontijne; M F Michel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  114 in total

1.  The relative contributions of physical structure and cell density to the antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria in biofilms.

Authors:  Amy E Kirby; Kimberly Garner; Bruce R Levin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  The development of ciprofloxacin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa involves multiple response stages and multiple proteins.

Authors:  Hsun-Cheng Su; Kevin Ramkissoon; Janet Doolittle; Martha Clark; Jainab Khatun; Ashley Secrest; Matthew C Wolfgang; Morgan C Giddings
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Population dynamics of antibiotic treatment: a mathematical model and hypotheses for time-kill and continuous-culture experiments.

Authors:  Bruce R Levin; Klas I Udekwu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Pharmacodynamic modeling of in vitro activity of marbofloxacin against Escherichia coli strains.

Authors:  M Andraud; C Chauvin; P Sanders; M Laurentie
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Mechanism-based pharmacodynamic models of fluoroquinolone resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Philip Chung; Patrick J McNamara; Jeffrey J Campion; Martin E Evans
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Pharmacodynamic model to describe the concentration-dependent selection of cefotaxime-resistant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Sara K Olofsson; Patricia Geli; Dan I Andersson; Otto Cars
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Comparison of antibiotic susceptibility of Burkholderia cepacia complex organisms when grown planktonically or as biofilm in vitro.

Authors:  E Caraher; G Reynolds; P Murphy; S McClean; M Callaghan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Phenotypic tolerance: antibiotic enrichment of noninherited resistance in bacterial populations.

Authors:  C Wiuff; R M Zappala; R R Regoes; K N Garner; F Baquero; B R Levin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Concentration-effect relationship of ceftazidime explains why the time above the MIC is 40 percent for a static effect in vivo.

Authors:  Johan W Mouton; Nieko Punt; Alexander A Vinks
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  A computational tool integrating host immunity with antibiotic dynamics to study tuberculosis treatment.

Authors:  Elsje Pienaar; Nicholas A Cilfone; Philana Ling Lin; Véronique Dartois; Joshua T Mattila; J Russell Butler; JoAnne L Flynn; Denise E Kirschner; Jennifer J Linderman
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.