Literature DB >> 31960243

Social benefits of improving water infrastructure in South Korea: upgrading sewage treatment plants.

Joongha Ahn1, HyungBin Moon2, Jungwoo Shin3, Jaena Ryu4.   

Abstract

A sewage treatment plant is considered an undesirable facility because of public concerns about odor, hygiene, and lowered house prices in the neighborhood. In South Korea, many aging sewage treatment plants need to be upgraded because they show inadequate performance on the removal of major pollutants. However, issues involved in such upgrades include social conflicts between the local government and residents, and economic feasibility. Examinations of social acceptability that include economic analyses are needed in order to fulfill social demand for upgrading the sewage treatment plants while simultaneously guaranteeing efficiency and minimizing social costs. This study investigates the social benefits of expanding and modernizing sewage treatment plants in South Korea using the contingent valuation method. Results show that Korean households, on average, are willing to pay 36,340 KRW (33.25 USD) per year for upgrading sewage treatment plants. About 47.73% of the project costs can be covered by the social benefits the Korean households enjoy. This study suggests that the Korean government needs to consider estimated social benefits in determining the scale and timeline of upgrade projects. The results of this study may help with stable implementation of upgrade projects for sewage treatment plants.

Keywords:  Contingent valuation method; Sewage treatment plant upgrades; Social benefits; Stated preference approach; Willingness-to-pay

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31960243     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-07733-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  19 in total

1.  Wastewater management through the ages: a history of mankind.

Authors:  Giusy Lofrano; Jeanette Brown
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Economic feasibility study for wastewater treatment: a cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  María Molinos-Senante; Francesc Hernández-Sancho; Ramón Sala-Garrido
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Assessing odour nuisance from wastewater treatment and composting facilities in Greece.

Authors:  Katia Lasaridi; George Katsabanis; Adamantini Kyriacou; Thomas Maggos; Thrassyvoulos Manios; Mihalis Fountoulakis; Nicolas Kalogerakis; Petros Karageorgos; Edward Ian Stentiford
Journal:  Waste Manag Res       Date:  2010-06-03

4.  Economic valuation of environmental benefits from wastewater treatment processes: an empirical approach for Spain.

Authors:  Francesc Hernández-Sancho; María Molinos-Senante; Ramón Sala-Garrido
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Exploring factors influencing farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for a planned adaptation programme to address climatic issues in agricultural sectors.

Authors:  Adeel Ahmed; Muhammad Mehedi Masud; Abul Quasem Al-Amin; Siti Rohani Binti Yahaya; Mahfuzur Rahman; Rulia Akhtar
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Why environmental and social benefits should be included in cost-benefit analysis of infrastructure?

Authors:  Jaena Ryu; Kyungah Kim; Myoungjin Oh; Jungwoo Shin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-05-26       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Shadow prices of emerging pollutants in wastewater treatment plants: Quantification of environmental externalities.

Authors:  A Bellver-Domingo; R Fuentes; F Hernández-Sancho
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 6.789

8.  Identification, quantification and treatment of fecal odors released into the air at two wastewater treatment plants.

Authors:  Yubin Zhou; Samantha A Hallis; Tadeo Vitko; Irwin H Mel Suffet
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.789

9.  Economic value of traffic noise reduction depending on residents' annoyance level.

Authors:  Kyungah Kim; Jungwoo Shin; Myoungjin Oh; Jung-Kyu Jung
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  The social benefits of restoring water quality in the context of the Water Framework Directive: A comparison of willingness to pay and willingness to accept.

Authors:  Salvador Del Saz-Salazar; Francesc Hernández-Sancho; Ramón Sala-Garrido
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 7.963

View more
  1 in total

1.  Public willingness to pay for eradicating a harmful marine organism: the case of Aurelia aurita in South Korea.

Authors:  Ju-Hee Kim; Se-Jun Jin; Seung-Hoon Yoo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 5.190

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.