Literature DB >> 19473689

The social benefits of restoring water quality in the context of the Water Framework Directive: A comparison of willingness to pay and willingness to accept.

Salvador Del Saz-Salazar1, Francesc Hernández-Sancho, Ramón Sala-Garrido.   

Abstract

The Water Framework Directive (WFD) is by far the most important piece of water legislation in Europe for the coming decades. Its main aim is to achieve "good ecological status" for all water resources by 2015. The economic valuation of the non-market benefits derived from improving water quality is an important input in assisting the design and implementation of efficient and effective water management policies. In this study, the contingent valuation method has been applied with a double purpose. On the one hand, we have estimated the value of a hypothetical improvement in water quality of a river asking individuals about their willingness to pay, and on the other hand, the issue of exemptions contemplated in the WFD has been addressed surveying people on their willingness to accept compensation if projected improvements were not carried out. Finally, a comparison of costs and benefits in a cost-benefit framework shows that the net present value of the water quality policy is positive both if we consider willingness to pay estimates as willingness to accept estimates, therefore this policy appears desirable from a social perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19473689     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Spatial disparities of the willingness of the residents to pay for the wetland restoration of Taihu Lake and its integration into decision making: a case study on Wuxi, China.

Authors:  Jia He; Xiang Sun; Xiaodong Zhu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Impact of perceived importance of ecosystem services and stated financial constraints on willingness to pay for riparian meadow restoration in Flanders (Belgium).

Authors:  Wendy Y Chen; Joris Aertsens; Inge Liekens; Steven Broekx; Leo De Nocker
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Social benefits of improving water infrastructure in South Korea: upgrading sewage treatment plants.

Authors:  Joongha Ahn; HyungBin Moon; Jungwoo Shin; Jaena Ryu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Assessing local communities’ willingness to pay for river network protection: a contingent valuation study of Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Zhaoyi Shang; Yue Che; Kai Yang; Yu Jiang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Water-borne diseases, cost of illness and willingness to pay for diseases interventions in rural communities of developing countries.

Authors:  A Malik; A Yasar; Ab Tabinda; M Abubakar
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 1.429

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.