Literature DB >> 25613801

Exploring factors influencing farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for a planned adaptation programme to address climatic issues in agricultural sectors.

Adeel Ahmed1, Muhammad Mehedi Masud, Abul Quasem Al-Amin, Siti Rohani Binti Yahaya, Mahfuzur Rahman, Rulia Akhtar.   

Abstract

This study empirically estimates farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for a planned adaptation programme for addressing climate issues in Pakistan's agricultural sectors. The contingent valuation method (CVM) was employed to determine a monetary valuation of farmers' preferences for a planned adaptation programme by ascertaining the value attached to address climatic issues. The survey was conducted by distributing structured questionnaires among Pakistani farmers. The study found that 67 % of respondents were willing to pay for a planned adaptation programme. However, several socioeconomic and motivational factors exert greater influence on their willingness to pay (WTP). This paper specifies the steps needed for all institutional bodies to better address issues in climate change. The outcomes of this paper will support attempts by policy makers to design an efficient adaptation framework for mitigating and adapting to the adverse impacts of climate change.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25613801     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4110-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  8 in total

Review 1.  Perception and communication of flood risks: a systematic review of empirical research.

Authors:  Wim Kellens; Teun Terpstra; Philippe De Maeyer
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Adapting agriculture to climate change.

Authors:  S Mark Howden; Jean-François Soussana; Francesco N Tubiello; Netra Chhetri; Michael Dunlop; Holger Meinke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Managing forests for climate change mitigation.

Authors:  Josep G Canadell; Michael R Raupach
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment.

Authors:  Richard H Moss; Jae A Edmonds; Kathy A Hibbard; Martin R Manning; Steven K Rose; Detlef P van Vuuren; Timothy R Carter; Seita Emori; Mikiko Kainuma; Tom Kram; Gerald A Meehl; John F B Mitchell; Nebojsa Nakicenovic; Keywan Riahi; Steven J Smith; Ronald J Stouffer; Allison M Thomson; John P Weyant; Thomas J Wilbanks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Direct climate effects of perennial bioenergy crops in the United States.

Authors:  Matei Georgescu; David B Lobell; Christopher B Field
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity.

Authors:  C J Vörösmarty; P B McIntyre; M O Gessner; D Dudgeon; A Prusevich; P Green; S Glidden; S E Bunn; C A Sullivan; C Reidy Liermann; P M Davies
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Water quality perceptions and willingness to pay for clean water in peri-urban Cambodian communities.

Authors:  Jennifer Orgill; Ameer Shaheed; Joe Brown; Marc Jeuland
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.744

Review 8.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Mandy Ryan; Karen Gerard
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 3.046

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Influencing the agricultural sector to embrace adaptation to climate change, for the sake of global food security.

Authors:  Joanne McElhinney
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Social benefits of improving water infrastructure in South Korea: upgrading sewage treatment plants.

Authors:  Joongha Ahn; HyungBin Moon; Jungwoo Shin; Jaena Ryu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Cross-Strait climate change and agricultural product loss.

Authors:  Hsing-Chun Lin; Li-Chen Chou; Wan-Hao Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Economic benefits of preventing bird collisions in South Korea: findings from a choice experiment survey.

Authors:  Chang-Min Kim; Ju-Hee Kim; Seung-Hoon Yoo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 5.190

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.