| Literature DB >> 31956560 |
Celestina I Orabueze1, Duncan A Ota2, Herbert A Coker3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malaria is a leading cause of death in Nigeria. AIM: Antimalarial activity of Stemonocoleus micranthus stem bark was evaluated in mice with an objective to finding scientific evidence for its use as antimalarial remedy in South-east Nigeria.Entities:
Keywords: Antimalarial; Antioxidants; Fractions; GC-MS; Stemonocoleus micranthus
Year: 2019 PMID: 31956560 PMCID: PMC6957798 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2019.03.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Tradit Complement Med ISSN: 2225-4110
Phytochemical constituents of various solvent crude extracts of S. micranthus (SM) stem bark.
| Test | Hexane | Chloroform | Ethyl acetate | 80% MeOH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saponin | – | – | – | + |
| Alkaloid | – | – | – | + |
| Tannin | + | + | + | + |
| Phenol | – | + | + | + |
| Flavonoid | – | – | + | + |
| Terpenoid | – | – | + | + |
| Steroid glycoside | + | + | + | + |
| Cardiac glycosides | + | + | + | + |
| Anthraquinone | + | + | + | + |
| Reducing sugar | + | + | + | + |
KEY: Absence + Presence.
Suppressive activity of stem bark extract of S. micranthus against P. berghei infection in mice.
| Drug | Conc. mg kg-1 | % Parasitaemia | % Chemosuppression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5% DMSO | 0.2 mL | 11.26 ± 0.39 | – |
| Chloroquine | 5 | 0.78 ± 0.02* | 93.09 |
| SM | 50 | 5.06 ± 0.3* | 55.14 |
| SM | 100 | 3.44 ± 0.26* | 69.50 |
| SM | 200 | 3.79 ± 0.18* | 66.40 |
| SM | 400 | 3.64 ± 1.02* | 67.73 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 5.
Significant at *p < 0.05 with reference to vehicle treated mice (negative control).
Suppressive activity of fractions of S. micranthus against P. berghei infection in mice.
| Drug | Dose | % | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5% DMSO | 0.2 mL | 10.2 ± 0.39 | 0 |
| Chloroquine | 5 | 0.74 ± 0.02* | 94.75 |
| FH | 20 | 4.14 ± 0.13* | 59.41 |
| 40 | 3.48 ± 0.11* | 65.88 | |
| 80 | 3.26 ± 0.12* | 68.04 | |
| FC | 20 | 2.94 ± 0.14* | 71.18 |
| 40 | 2.05 ± 0.15* | 79.9 | |
| 80 | 1.78 ± 0.09* | 82.54 | |
| FE | 20 | 2.17 ± 0.07* | 78.73 |
| 40 | 1.37 ± 0.06* | 86.57 | |
| 80 | 0.56 ± 0.05* | 94.51 | |
| FA | 20 | 3.14 ± 0.18* | 69.22 |
| 40 | 2.84 ± 0.12* | 72.16 | |
| 80 | 2.14 ± 0.05* | 79.10 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 5.
Significant at *p < 0.05 with reference to vehicle treated mice (negative control).
Curative effect of stem bark extract of S. micranthus against P. berghei infection in mice.
| Drug | Dose mg kg −1 | Parasitaemia | DAY 4 | DAY 5 | DAY 6 | DAY 7 | DAY 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5% DMSO | 0.2 mL | % Parasitaemia | 13.18 ± 0.07 | 15.35 ± 0.24 | 18.30 ± 0.04 | 20.47 ± 0.51 | 21.31 ± 0.11 |
| % Cure | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| SM (Crude extract) | 50 | % Parasitaemia | 12.11 ± 0.25 | 9.37 ± 0.20 | 8.58 ± 0.36 | 7.67 ± 0.41 | 5.45 ± 0.27 |
| % Cure | 8.12 | 38.96 | 53.11 | 62.53* | 74.43* | ||
| 100 | % Parasitaemia | 12.19 ± 1.03 | 8.55 ± 2.01 | 5.86 ± 0.62 | 3.71 ± 1.07 | 2.02 ± 0.38 | |
| % Cure | 7.51 | 44.30 | 67.98 | 81.88* | 90.52* | ||
| 200 | % Parasitaemia | 12.41 ± 1.24 | 9.05 ± 0.10 | 6.09 ± 0.41 | 3.73 ± 0.16 | 1.91 ± 0.02 | |
| % Cure | 5.84 | 41.04 | 66.72 | 81.78* | 91.04* | ||
| 400 | % Parasitaemia | 12.36 ± 0.03 | 7.89 ± 0.14 | 5.31 ± 1.02 | 3.54 ± 0.05 | 1.70 ± 0.23 | |
| % Cure | 6.22 | 48.60 | 70.98 | 82.71* | 92.02* | ||
| CQ | 5 | % Parasitaemia | 10.69 ± 0.06 | 4.38 ± 1.30 | 1.39 ± 1.24 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| % Cure | 18.89 | 71.47 | 92.40 | 100.00* | 100.00* |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 5.
Results are expressed as the percent clearance of parasitaemia with reference to non-treated mice, 5% DMSO (negative control).
Significant at P < 0.05 with reference to vehicle treated mice (negative control).
Survival rate and Mean Survival Time (MST) of each group on Day 30 (D0-D29) during curative test.
| Drug | Dose mg Kg - | Survival rate | Survival (%) on day 30 | Mean Survival Time (MST) of each group in days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5% DMSO | 0.2 mL | 0/5 | 0 | 5.67 ± 1.74 |
| SM crude extract | 50 | 0/5 | 0 | 17.20 ± 0.80* |
| 100 | 3/5 | 60 | 24.67 ± 1.80* | |
| 200 | 5/5 | 100 | 30.00 ± 0.00* | |
| 400 | 5/5 | 100 | 30.00 ± 0.00* | |
| CQa | 5 | 4/5 | 80 | 27.01 ± 2.31* |
| FH | 20 | 0/5 | 0 | 15.67 ± 0.87* |
| 40 | 0/5 | 0 | 16.67 ± 0.80* | |
| 80 | 0/5 | 0 | 17.60 ± 0.24* | |
| FC | 20 | 0/5 | 0 | 20.01 ± 0.20* |
| 40 | 3/5 | 60 | 23.00 ± 0.94* | |
| 80 | 5/5 | 100 | 30.00 ± 0.00* | |
| FE | 20 | 0/5 | 0 | 21.67 ± 0.53* |
| 40 | 4/5 | 80 | 27.99 ± 2.00* | |
| 80 | 5/5 | 100 | 30.00 ± 0.00* | |
| FA | 20 | 0/5 | 0 | 14.67 ± 0.33* |
| 40 | 0/5 | 0 | 15.53 ± 0.88* | |
| 80 | 0/5 | 0 | 17.80 ± 0.20* | |
| CQb | 5 | 4/5 | 80 | 28.00 ± 1.02* |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 5.
Significant at P < 0.05 with reference to vehicle treated mice (negative control).
CQa: Chloroquine, reference used for SM crude extract.
CQb: Chloroquine, reference used for the fractions.
Curative activity of fractions from hydro-methanolic stem bark extract of S. micranthus against P. berghei infection in mice.
| Drug | Dose mg kg −1 | Parasitaemia | DAY 4 | DAY 5 | DAY 6 | DAY 7 | DAY 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5% DMSO | 0.2 mL | % Parasitaemia | 10.44 ± 0.18 | 14.71 ± 0.44 | 18.05 ± 0.83 | 20.47 ± 0.21 | 22.21 ± 0.46 |
| % Cure | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| FH (Hexane fraction) | 20 | % Parasitaemia | 10.58 ± 0.36 | 8.75 ± 0.10 | 7.94 ± 0.10 | 6.93 ± 0.22 | 6.28 ± 0.21 |
| % Cure | −1.34 | 40.51 | 56.01 | 66.15* | 72.06* | ||
| 40 | % Parasitaemia | 9.93 ± 0.38 | 8.57 ± 0.12 | 7.43 ± 0.05 | 6.64 ± 0.12 | 5.68 ± 0.20 | |
| % Cure | 4.89 | 41.74 | 58.84 | 67.56* | 74.73* | ||
| 80 | % Parasitaemia | 11.28 ± 0.57 | 9.72 ± 0.02 | 7.6 ± | 6.3 ± | 4.67 ± 0.09 | |
| % Cure | −8.05 | 33.92 | 57.89 | 69.22* | 79.23* | ||
| FC (Chloroform fraction) | 20 | % Parasitaemia | 11.28 ± 0.00 | 8.16 ± 0.40 | 6.60 ± 0.24 | 4.8 ± 0.27 | 3.004 ± 0.22 |
| % Cure | −8.05 | 44.53 | 63.45 | 76.55* | 86.48* | ||
| 40 | % Parasitaemia | 10.3 ± 0.13 | 8.07 ± 0.12 | 6.36 ± 0.08 | 4.53 ± 0.16 | 2.86 ± 0.14 | |
| % Cure | 1.34 | 45.14 | 64.76 | 77.87* | 87.28* | ||
| 80 | % Parasitaemia | 9.99 ± 0.49 | 8.15 ± 0.17 | 5.84 ± 0.11 | 3.83 ± 0.03 | 1.89 ± 0.15 | |
| % Cure | 4.31 | 44.6 | 67.65 | 81.28* | 91.59* | ||
| FE (Ethyl acetate fraction) | 20 | % Parasitaemia | 10.9 ± 0.11 | 9.11 ± 0.24 | 7.59 ± 0.18 | 5.46 ± 0.10 | 3.28 ± 0.23 |
| % Cure | −4.41 | 38.07 | 57.89 | 81.39* | 85.41* | ||
| 40 | % Parasitaemia | 9.76 ± 0.32 | 7.72 ± 0.18 | 5.7 ± | 3.48 ± 0.20 | 1.33 ± 0.15 | |
| % Cure | 6.51 | 47.52 | 68.42 | 83.00* | 94.08* | ||
| 80 | % Parasitaemia | 9.83 ± 0.18 | 7.55 ± 0.18 | 5.49 ± 0.23 | 3.14 ± 0.14 | 0.91 ± 0.05 | |
| % Cure | 5.75 | 48.67 | 69.58 | 84.66* | 95.95* | ||
| FA (Aqueous fraction) | 20 | % Parasitaemia | 9.69 ± 0.29 | 8.41 ± 0.45 | 8.24 ± 0.27 | 7.25 ± 0.36 | 6.32 ± 0.46 |
| % Cure | 7.18 | 42.83 | 54.35 | 64.58* | 71.89* | ||
| 40 | % Parasitaemia | 10.04 ± 0.25 | 9.7 ± 0.17 | 9.06 ± 0.08 | 7.01 ± 0.23 | 5.34 ± 0.21 | |
| % Cure | 3.83 | 34.06 | 49.81 | 65.75* | 76.25* | ||
| 80 | % Parasitaemia | 9.75 ± 0.07 | 8.42 ± 0.34 | 7.26 ± 0.27 | 5.09 ± 0.26 | 3.28 ± 0.18 | |
| % Cure | 6.61 | 42.76 | 59.78 | 75.13* | 85.41* | ||
| CQ | 5 | % Parasitaemia | 9.03 ± 0.13 | 3.92± | 1.32 ± | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| % Cure | 13.51 | 73.35 | 92.67 | 100.00* | 100* |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 5.
Significant at P < 0.05 with reference to vehicle treated mice (negative control).
Fig. 1Antioxidant profile of crude extract and fractions of crude hydro-methanolic extract of. S. micranthus compared with a standard drug Vit C. Data are means ± standard deviation of triplicate experiments. FC: Chloroform fraction of crude hydro-methanolic extract FE: Ethyl acetate fraction of crude hydro-methanolic extract FA: Aqueous fraction of crude hydro-methanolic extract.
Fig. 2GC-MS chromatograms of fraction of S. micranthus showing the retention time (min) of the compounds in X-axis and percentage (%) of peak area in the Y-axis. A: Chloroform fraction (FC); B: Ethyl acetate fraction (FE); C: Aqueous fraction (FA).