| Literature DB >> 34195025 |
Ifeoma C Ezenyi1, Chinazo K Okpoko1,2, Chinasa A Ufondu1, Samuel E Okhale3, Bulus Adzu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Burkea africana stem bark is used as a remedy for malaria in north-central and southern Nigeria. Based on its traditional use, this study was conducted to investigate the antiplasmodial, antinociceptive and antipyretic potential of an extract of B. africana stem bark. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE: A 70% v/v ethanol extract of stem bark of B. africana was prepared by cold maceration. Fractions (dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, and residual) were also prepared. The extract was screened for hemolytic, cytotoxic and antiplasmodial activity effects. The effect of the extract and fractions against chloroquine-sensitive (3D7) and multi-drug resistant (W2mef) P. falciparum was assessed. Acute toxicity test, acetic acid-induced abdominal writhing in mice, and lipopolysaccharide-induced fever in rats were also employed to screen the extract. Chromatographic fingerprints of the extract and active fraction were obtained.Entities:
Keywords: Analgesic; Antipyretic; Cytotoxicity; Medicinal plant; Plasmodium falciparum
Year: 2021 PMID: 34195025 PMCID: PMC8240106 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2020.12.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Tradit Complement Med ISSN: 2225-4110
Fig. 1aConcentration-response curves of B.africana extract and dichloromethane fraction against P. falciparum 3D7. Each data point represents the mean ± SEM (n=3). IC50 values: Extract =28.69 µg/ml, DCM fraction = 6.44 µg/ml, Artesunate = 10.80nM, Chloroquine = 31.65 nM.
Fig. 1bRetain caption as "Concentration-response curves of B. africana extract and dichloromethane fraction against P. falciparum W2mef. Each data point represents the mean ± SEM (n=3). IC50 values: Extract = 25.19 µg/ml, DCM fraction = 6.30 µg/ml, Artesunate = 16.79 nM, Chloroquine = 147.5 nM.
In vitro cytotoxicity and hemolysis assay.
| Treatment | Concentration | Inhibition (%) | Red Blood Cells Lysis (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HEK 293 | |||
| BA | 0.125 mg/ml | NI | NT |
| 0.250 mg/ml | NI | NT | |
| 0.500 mg/ml | NI | NT | |
| 1.000 mg/ml | NI | 9.28 | |
| Etoposide | 100 nm | 33.00 | NT |
| Triton X | 0.1% | NT | 100 |
PBS – Phosphate buffered saline, BA – Burkea africana, NT – Not tested, NI - No Inhibition.
Fig. 2Effect of ethanol extract of Burkea africana stem bark on acetic acid-induced abdominal writhing. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 5. Significant at ∗p < 0.05 compared to vehicle control (negative control).
Effect of ethanol extract of B. africana stem bark on LPS-induced fever.
| Group/treatment | Difference in Temperature from Baseline (oC) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h | 2 h | 3 h | 4 h | 5 h | |
| Normothermic/vehicle | −0.15 ± 0.40 | 0.30 ± 0.21 | 0.07 ± 0.29 | 0.25 ± 0.10 | 0.43 ± 0.30 |
| Hyperthermic/vehicle | 1.07 ± 0.25 | 1.73 ± 0.33 | 1.57 ± 0.30 | 1.30 ± 0.38 | 1.38 ± 0.19 |
| 100 mg/kg BA | 1.03 ± 0.27 | 1.08 ± 0.33 | 0.98 ± 0.17 | 1.27 ± 0.26 | 1.22 ± 0.22 |
| 300 mg/kg BA | 0.67 ± 0.36 | 0.60 ± 0.23∗ | 0.48 ± 0.35∗ | 0.90 ± 0.19 | 0.62 ± 0.36 |
| 900 mg/kg BA | 0.46 ± 0.22 | 1.08 ± 0.22 | 1.12 ± 0.17 | 0.52 ± 0.21 | 0.58 ± 0.23 |
| PCM 300 mg/kg | 0.23 ± 0.21 | 0.23 ± 0.42∗∗ | 0.42 ± 0.55∗ | 0.95 ± 0.31 | 1.05 ± 0.17 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 6. Significant at ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01 compared to hyperthermic vehicle control (negative control).
Fig. 3a. HPLC fingerprint of ethanol extract of B. africana stem bark, b. HPLC fingerprint of dichloromethane fraction of ethanol extract of Burkea africana stem bark., c. HPLC profile of rutin, d. HPLC profile of caffeic acid.