Literature DB >> 31954707

Unscheduled Radiologic Examination Orders in the Electronic Health Record: A Novel Resource for Targeting Ambulatory Diagnostic Errors in Radiology.

Ronilda Lacson1, Michael J Healey2, Laila R Cochon3, Romeo Laroya3, Keith D Hentel4, Adam B Landman5, Sunil Eappen6, Giles W Boland7, Ramin Khorasani7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of unscheduled radiologic examination orders in an electronic health record, and the proportion of unscheduled orders that are clinically necessary, by modality.
METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted from January to October 2016 at an academic institution. All unscheduled radiologic examination orders were retrieved for seven modalities (CT, MR, ultrasound, obstetric ultrasound, bone densitometry, mammography, and fluoroscopy). After excluding duplicates, 100 randomly selected orders from each modality were assigned to two physician reviewers who classified their clinical necessity, with 10% overlap. Interannotator agreement was assessed using κ statistics, the percentage of clinically necessary unscheduled orders was compared, and χ2 analysis was used to assess differences by modality.
RESULTS: A total 494,503 radiologic examination orders were placed during the study period. After exclusions, 33,546 unscheduled orders were identified, 7% of all radiologic examination orders. Among 700 reviewed unscheduled orders, agreement was substantial (κ = 0.63). Eighty-seven percent of bone densitometric examinations and sixty-five percent of mammographic studies were considered clinically necessary, primarily for follow-up management. The majority of orders in each modality were clinically necessary, except for CT, obstetric ultrasound, and fluoroscopy (P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Large numbers of radiologic examination orders remain unscheduled in the electronic health record. A substantial portion are clinically necessary, representing potential delays in executing documented provider care plans. Clinically unnecessary unscheduled orders may inadvertently be scheduled and performed. Identifying and performing clinically necessary unscheduled radiologic examination orders may help reduce diagnostic errors related to diagnosis and treatment delays and enhance patient safety, while eliminating clinically unnecessary unscheduled orders will help avoid unneeded testing.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical order entry systems; delayed diagnosis; diagnostic errors; diagnostic imaging; patient safety

Year:  2020        PMID: 31954707      PMCID: PMC7509985          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.12.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  43 in total

1.  Adoption and meaningful use of computerized physician order entry with an integrated clinical decision support system for radiology: ten-year analysis in an urban teaching hospital.

Authors:  Ivan K Ip; Louise I Schneider; Richard Hanson; Dana Marchello; Patricia Hultman; Michael Viera; Brian Chiango; Katherine P Andriole; Andrew Menard; Susan Schade; Steven E Seltzer; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Improving safety and eliminating redundant tests: cutting costs in U.S. hospitals.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; David C Chan; Abigail B Ridgway; Calvin Franz; David W Bates
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 3.  Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner Society.

Authors:  Martine Remy-Jardin; Massimo Pistolesi; Lawrence R Goodman; Warren B Gefter; Alexander Gottschalk; John R Mayo; H Dirk Sostman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Characteristics of knowledge content in a curated online evidence library.

Authors:  Sowmya Varada; Ronilda Lacson; Ali S Raja; Ivan K Ip; Louise Schneider; David Osterbur; Paul Bain; Nicole Vetrano; Jacqueline Cellini; Carol Mita; Margaret Coletti; Julia Whelan; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  From the Office of the National Coordinator: the strategy for advancing the exchange of health information.

Authors:  Claudia Williams; Farzad Mostashari; Kory Mertz; Emily Hogin; Parmeeth Atwal
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Assessing Documentation of Critical Imaging Result Follow-up Recommendations in Emergency Department Discharge Instructions.

Authors:  Anurag Gupta; Ronilda Lacson; Patricia C Balthazar; Shan Haq; Adam B Landman; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Addressing overutilization in medical imaging.

Authors:  William R Hendee; Gary J Becker; James P Borgstede; Jennifer Bosma; William J Casarella; Beth A Erickson; C Douglas Maynard; James H Thrall; Paul E Wallner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Validation and refinement of a prediction rule to identify children at low risk for acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Anupam B Kharbanda; Nanette C Dudley; Lalit Bajaj; Michelle D Stevenson; Charles G Macias; Manoj K Mittal; Richard G Bachur; Jonathan E Bennett; Kelly Sinclair; Craig Huang; Peter S Dayan
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2012-08

9.  Primary care closed claims experience of Massachusetts malpractice insurers.

Authors:  Gordon D Schiff; Ann Louise Puopolo; Anne Huben-Kearney; Winnie Yu; Carol Keohane; Peggy McDonough; Bonnie R Ellis; David W Bates; Madeleine Biondolillo
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013 Dec 9-23       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 10.  Diagnosing appendicitis: evidence-based review of the diagnostic approach in 2014.

Authors:  Daniel J Shogilev; Nicolaj Duus; Stephen R Odom; Nathan I Shapiro
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-10-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Collaborative Case Review: A Systems-Based Approach to Patient Safety Event Investigation and Analysis.

Authors:  Ronilda Lacson; Ramin Khorasani; Karen Fiumara; Neena Kapoor; Patrick Curley; Giles W Boland; Sunil Eappen
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.243

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.