OBJECTIVE: To validate and refine a clinical prediction rule to identify which children with acute abdominal pain are at low risk for appendicitis (Low-Risk Appendicitis Rule). DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Ten pediatric emergency departments. PARTICIPANTS: Children and adolescents aged 3 to 18 years who presented with suspected appendicitis from March 1, 2009, through April 30, 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The test performance of the Low-Risk Appendicitis Rule. RESULTS: Among 2625 patients enrolled, 1018 (38.8% [95% CI, 36.9%-40.7%]) had appendicitis. Validation of the rule resulted in a sensitivity of 95.5% (95% CI, 93.9%-96.7%), specificity of 36.3% (33.9%-38.9%), and negative predictive value of 92.7% (90.1%-94.6%). Theoretical application would have identified 573 (24.0%) as being at low risk, misclassifying 42 patients (4.5% [95% CI, 3.4%-6.1%]) with appendicitis. We refined the prediction rule, resulting in a model that identified patients at low risk with (1) an absolute neutrophil count of 6.75 × 103/μL or less and no maximal tenderness in the right lower quadrant or (2) an absolute neutrophil count of 6.75 × 103/μL or less with maximal tenderness in the right lower quadrant but no abdominal pain with walking/jumping or coughing. This refined rule had a sensitivity of 98.1% (95% CI, 97.0%-98.9%), specificity of 23.7% (21.7%-25.9%), and negative predictive value of 95.3% (92.3%-97.0%). CONCLUSIONS: We have validated and refined a simple clinical prediction rule for pediatric appendicitis. For patients identified as being at low risk, clinicians should consider alternative strategies, such as observation or ultrasonographic examination, rather than proceeding to immediate computed tomographic imaging.
OBJECTIVE: To validate and refine a clinical prediction rule to identify which children with acute abdominal pain are at low risk for appendicitis (Low-Risk Appendicitis Rule). DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Ten pediatric emergency departments. PARTICIPANTS: Children and adolescents aged 3 to 18 years who presented with suspected appendicitis from March 1, 2009, through April 30, 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The test performance of the Low-Risk Appendicitis Rule. RESULTS: Among 2625 patients enrolled, 1018 (38.8% [95% CI, 36.9%-40.7%]) had appendicitis. Validation of the rule resulted in a sensitivity of 95.5% (95% CI, 93.9%-96.7%), specificity of 36.3% (33.9%-38.9%), and negative predictive value of 92.7% (90.1%-94.6%). Theoretical application would have identified 573 (24.0%) as being at low risk, misclassifying 42 patients (4.5% [95% CI, 3.4%-6.1%]) with appendicitis. We refined the prediction rule, resulting in a model that identified patients at low risk with (1) an absolute neutrophil count of 6.75 × 103/μL or less and no maximal tenderness in the right lower quadrant or (2) an absolute neutrophil count of 6.75 × 103/μL or less with maximal tenderness in the right lower quadrant but no abdominal pain with walking/jumping or coughing. This refined rule had a sensitivity of 98.1% (95% CI, 97.0%-98.9%), specificity of 23.7% (21.7%-25.9%), and negative predictive value of 95.3% (92.3%-97.0%). CONCLUSIONS: We have validated and refined a simple clinical prediction rule for pediatric appendicitis. For patients identified as being at low risk, clinicians should consider alternative strategies, such as observation or ultrasonographic examination, rather than proceeding to immediate computed tomographic imaging.
Authors: David A Partrick; James E Janik; Joseph S Janik; Denis D Bensard; Frederick M Karrer Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Anupam B Kharbanda; Michael C Monuteaux; Richard G Bachur; Nanette C Dudley; Lalit Bajaj; Michelle D Stevenson; Charles G Macias; Manoj K Mittal; Jonathan E Bennett; Kelly Sinclair; Peter S Dayan Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Ronilda Lacson; Michael J Healey; Laila R Cochon; Romeo Laroya; Keith D Hentel; Adam B Landman; Sunil Eappen; Giles W Boland; Ramin Khorasani Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2020-01-16 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Anupam B Kharbanda; Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez; Dustin W Ballard; David R Vinson; Uli K Chettipally; Mamata V Kene; Steven P Dehmer; Richard G Bachur; Peter S Dayan; Nathan Kuppermann; Patrick J O'Connor; Elyse O Kharbanda Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Anupam B Kharbanda; Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez; Dustin W Ballard; David R Vinson; Uli K Chettipally; Steven P Dehmer; Heidi Ekstrom; Adina S Rauchwerger; Brianna McMichael; Dale M Cotton; Mamata V Kene; Laura E Simon; Jingyi Zhu; E Margaret Warton; Patrick J O'Connor; Elyse O Kharbanda Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-02-01
Authors: Dai Su; Qinmengge Li; Tao Zhang; Philip Veliz; Yingchun Chen; Kevin He; Prashant Mahajan; Xingyu Zhang Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2022-01-14 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Samuel H F Lam; Anthony Grippo; Chistopher Kerwin; P John Konicki; Diana Goodwine; Michael J Lambert Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2014-09-18
Authors: Paul van Amstel; Ramon R Gorter; Johanna H van der Lee; Huib A Cense; Roel Bakx; Hugo A Heij Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 3.452