| Literature DB >> 31952146 |
Luying Zhao1, Gaigai Duan1, Guoying Zhang2, Haoqi Yang3, Shuijian He1, Shaohua Jiang1.
Abstract
Electrospinning is an effective and versatile method to prepare continuous polymer nanofibers and nonwovens that exhibit excellent properties such as high molecular orientation, high porosity and large specific surface area. Benefitting from these outstanding and intriguing features, electrospun nanofibers have been employed as a promising candidate for the fabrication of food packaging materials. Actually, the electrospun nanofibers used in food packaging must possess biocompatibility and low toxicity. In addition, in order to maintain the quality of food and extend its shelf life, food packaging materials also need to have certain functionality. Herein, in this timely review, functional materials produced from electrospinning toward food packaging are highlighted. At first, various strategies for the preparation of polymer electrospun fiber are introduced, then the characteristics of different packaging films and their successful applications in food packaging are summarized, including degradable materials, superhydrophobic materials, edible materials, antibacterial materials and high barrier materials. Finally, the future perspective and key challenges of polymer electrospun nanofibers for food packaging are also discussed. Hopefully, this review would provide a fundamental insight into the development of electrospun functional materials with high performance for food packaging.Entities:
Keywords: electrospinning; food packaging; functional membrane; nanofibers
Year: 2020 PMID: 31952146 PMCID: PMC7022779 DOI: 10.3390/nano10010150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Overview of functional electrospun and food packaging materials diagram.
Figure 2Photographs showing the range of structures that can be produced as the concentration (wt.%) is increased at Mw = 18,000 g/mol [77]. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figure 3A schematic of the experimental setup used in the multi-jet electrospinning process [85]. © American Chemical Society 2014.
Figure 4(a) Sequential images of the polymer-melt coated plate edge showing the progression of the fluid with time (in minutes, right side) at 180 °C at an applied voltage of −45 kV. The plate is oriented horizontally and being viewed from above. (b) Image of electrospinning from a polymer melt coated source plate (PE at 170 °C, −45 kV) in steady state (i.e., after 30 min). The black arrows indicate non-jetting perturbations. This figure is adapted from [87]. © 2014 IOP Publishing Ltd.
Figure 5Schematic representation of the coaxial needle electrospinning set-up [94]. © The Korean Society of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology 2012.
Figure 6Structure diagram of coaxial fiber [97]. © Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved 2016.
Figure 7(a) Comparison of photocatalytic activity of fibers with and without ZnO [114], © 2018 SAGE Publications. (b) photographs of bananas stored for 10 days covered with PP film (control) or PP film and nanofiber containing 5 wt% TiO2 [115]. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018.
Figure 8Electrospun hybrid mats; its antimicrobial concept and projected future applications as packaging material for meat and meat-based products [117]. © Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2014.
Figure 9Schematic of the effects of solvent removal on the 6AN distribution inside of an individual electrospun nanofiber. (A) A single PLLA fiber immediately after electrospinning with uniformly distributed 6AN. (B) A single PLLA fiber after solvent removal shuttled 6AN from inaccessible fiber core towards the fiber surface [120]. © Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved 2017.
Figure 10(a) Schematic diagram of surface pore formation induced by breath figures mechanism. (b) Schematic diagram of porosity induced by a vapor induced phase separation (VIPS) mechanism [137]. © Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved 2018.
Figure 11Appearance changes of strawberries stored at 21 °C. (a) Control; (b) packed with fresh-keeping film and (c) packed with PVA/cinnamon essential oil /b-CD nanofilm [141]. © Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved 2015.
Figure 12(a) FESEM images of electrospun PS fibers from 35 wt.% solution in DMF, (b) water droplet on electrospun PS fibers from 35 wt.% solution in DMF and (c) variation of water contact angles depending on surface structures (1: PS film; 2: electrospun PS fibers using THF; 3: electrospun PS fibers from DMF) [144]. © Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved 2007.
Figure 13(a,b) The results of dynamic contact assays against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. (c) The antioxidant performance of gelatin/EOs nanofibers was determined using the DPPH radical scavenging method, (∗) p (in Tukey’s post hoc test) < 0.05 versus the control group [145]. © American Chemical Society 2019.
Figure 14Effect of MMT-N6 nanofibrous membrane coating on PP packets on the natural flora of bread [149]. © Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved 2014.
Figure 15(a) In situ antibacterial activity of CNFP against E. coli after 7-day storage at 4 °C. (b) Appearance of packed red meat with and without CNFP, before and after grinding [150]. © John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2018.
Summary of promising properties related to packaging using electrospinning.
| Categories | Materials | Properties or Function |
|---|---|---|
| Polymer | Chitosan (CS) | biodegradation, biocompatibility, anti-microbial, antifungal activities, and non-toxicity. |
| Zein | good film-forming property, biocompatibility, biodegradation, renewable, edible | |
| Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) | transparency, gantistatic property, biodegradation, biocompatibility | |
| Gelatin (GT) | biodegradation, biocompatibility, edible, good toughness | |
| Polycaprolactone (PCL) | biocompatibility, biodegradability, good mechanical properties, better solvent solubility | |
| Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) | non-toxic, good mechanical properties, high transparency, good toughness | |
| Cellulose acetate (CA) | non-toxic, biodegradable, low price, good transparency, high impact resistance | |
| Polylactic acid (PLA) | biodegradation, biocompatibility, easy to process, good mechanical properties and transparency | |
| Poly (propylene carbonate) (PPC) | good tensile toughness, transparency, biocompatibility and biodegradability | |
| Polystyrene (PS) | High transparency, non-toxic, easy to process | |
| Inorganic fillers | Metronidazole (MNA) | hydrophobic, antibacterial |
| Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) | conductive, antistatic, smart packaging | |
| FePt, Fe3O4, FeCl3 nanoparticles | radiation protection | |
| TiO2 | photocatalytic, self-cleaning, photocatalytic degradation of ethylene | |
| ZnO | photocatalytic, self-cleaning, antibacterial | |
| Cerium-doped bioactive glass (CeBG), copper-doped bioactive glass (CuBG), silver-doped bioactive glass (AgBG) | antibacterial | |
| Montmorillonite (MMT) | antibacterial | |
| Active substance | Orange essential oil (OEO) | antibacterial |
| Metronidazole (MNA) | antibacterial | |
| Peppermint essential oil (PO), chamomile essential oil (CO) | antibacterial | |
| Vanillin/cyclodextrin inclusion complex (vanillin/CD-IC) | containing flavor/fragrance, enhancing thermal stability and durability | |
| Cinnamon essential oil/b-cyclodextrin (PVA/CEO/b-CD) | prolonging the shelf-life |