| Literature DB >> 28335256 |
Guiru Sun1,2, Liqun Sun3,4, Haiming Xie5,6, Jia Liu7,8.
Abstract
With global concerns about the shorEntities:
Keywords: dye-sensitized solar cells; electrospinning; fuel cells; lithium-based batteries; nanofibers; supercapacitors
Year: 2016 PMID: 28335256 PMCID: PMC5224596 DOI: 10.3390/nano6070129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic diagram of an electrospinning set-up.
Figure 2Schematics of: (a) Li-ion batteries; (b) lithium-sulfur batteries; (c) lithium-oxygen batteries.
Figure 3Model image of the triaxial nanowire with a vapor-grown carbon fiber (VGCF) core column and the two layer shells: an outer shell of amorphous carbon and an inner composite shell of LiFePO4 and amorphous carbon. Reproduced with permission from [53]. Copyright American Physical Society, 2010.
Electrospun cathode materials for Li-ion batteries (LIBs) and the corresponding electrochemical performance. DC: Discharge capacity.
| Material | Diameter/μm | Structure | DC (after Cycle Number)/mAh·g−1 | Rate | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiCoO2 | 0.5–2 | fiber | 123 (20) | 20 mA/g | [ |
| LiCoO2–MgO | 1–2 | core-shell fiber | 163 (40) | 20 mA/g | [ |
| LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 | 0.3 | particle | 160 (5) | 20 mA/g | [ |
| LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2 | 0.1–0.8 | nanofiber | 116 (30) | 85 mA/g | [ |
| Li1.2Mn0.54Ni0.13Co0.13O2/CNFs | - | nanofiber | 176.7 (100) | 1 C | [ |
| Li1.2Ni0.17Co0.17Mn0.5O2 | 0.1–0.5 | nanofiber | 141–205 (20) | 14.2 mA/g | [ |
| LiFePO4/C | - | fiber | 131–145 (0.1) | - | [ |
| LiFePO4/CNT/C | 0.168 | nanofiber | 169 (average) | 0.05 C | [ |
| LiFePO4/CNT/C | - | core-shell fiber | - | - | [ |
| V2O5 | 0.2–0.5 | nanofiber | 240 (25) | 0.1 mA/cm2 | [ |
| V2O5 | 0.2–0.4 | hierarchical porous nanofiber | 133.9 (100) | 800 mA/g | [ |
| V2O5 | 0.1–0.2 | hierarchical nanowire | 201 (30) | 30 mA/g | [ |
| V2O5 | 0.3–0.5 | porous nanotube | 130.5 (50) | 0.2 C | [ |
| LiMn2O4 | 0.17 | porous network | 146 (1) | 0.1 C | [ |
| Li3V2(PO4)3/CNF | 0.3 | nanofiber | 102 (1000) | 20 C | [ |
| Li3V2(PO4)3/CNF | 0.18–0.43 | nanofiber | 118.9 (1000) | 20 C | [ |
| LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 | <0.2 | nanofiber | 138 (1) | 50 mA/g | [ |
| LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 | 0.05–0.25 | nanofiber | 120 (50) | 0.01 mA/cm | [ |
| LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 | 0.05–0.1 | nanofiber | 300 (1) | 27 mA/g | [ |
Figure 4Schematics of the structural design of the core-shell silicon/carbon fiber (Si/po-C@C) composite fiber: (a) structural formation and change of Si/po-C@C during heat treatment and cycling process, respectively; (b) three-dimensional (3D) sketch of the overall structure. (SEI: solid-electrolyte interphase). Reproduced with permission from [82]. Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015.
Figure 5Photographs of the electrospun/sprayed flexible paper electrode (a) before and (b) after carbonization with 72 wt % Si; SEM images of the 3D Si/C fiber paper electrode: (c–e) top view and (f) cross-section. Reproduced with permission from [83]. Copyright Wiley, 2014.
Scheme 1Preparation of Sn@carbon nanoparticles encapsulated in hollow carbon nanofibers. Reproduced with permission from [88]. Copyright Wiley, 2009.
Scheme 2Formation mechanism of the TiO2 nanofiber with a fiber-in-tube nanostructure from the tributyltin (TBT)-poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) composite nanofiber. Reproduced with permission from [92]. Copyright Wiley, 2015.
Electrospun anode materials for LIBs and the corresponding electrochemical performance.
| Material | Diameter/μm | Structure | DC (after Cycle Number)/mAh·g−1 | Rate | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon | 0.2–0.3 | nanofiber | 350 | 100 mA/g | [ |
| Carbon | 0.3–0.4 | nanofiber | 255 (200) | 0.2 A/g | [ |
| Carbon | 0.1–0.2 | porous nanofiber | 1780 (40) | 50 mA/g | [ |
| Carbon | 0.9–1.2 | hollow nanofiber | 900.6 (1) | 100 mA/g | [ |
| Ag/C | ~0.3 | hollow nanofiber | 600.15 (100) | 50 mA/g | [ |
| GeO | 1 | core-shell | 875 (400) | 160 mA/g | [ |
| Co3O4/CNF | 0.8–1.2 | core-shell nanowire | 795 (50) | 100 mA/g | [ |
| Mn3O4/CNF | 0.5–1 | hierarchically mesoporous | 760 (50) | 100 mA/g | [ |
| N/GeO2-CNFs | 0.075 | nanofiber | 1031 (200) | 100 mA/g | [ |
| Si/C | 2–5 | hollow fiber | 725 (40) | 0.2 A/g | [ |
| Si/C | 0.6–0.8 | porous nanofiber | 870 (100) | 0.1 A/g | [ |
| Si/C | — | hollow fiber | 1045 (20) | 100 mA/g | [ |
| Si/C | 0.186 | nanofiber | 1215.2 (50) | 600 mA/g | [ |
| Si/C | ~2 | core-shell | 603 (300) | 0.5 A/g | [ |
| Si/C | ~0.2 | Fiber paper | 1267 (100) | 500 mA/g | [ |
| Sn/C | 0.1–0.18 | core-shell | 546.7 (100) | 40 mA/g | [ |
| Sn/C | ~0.2 | porous nanofiber | 774 (200) | 0.8 A/g | [ |
| Sn/C | 0.15–0.25 | Hollow nanofiber | 737 (200) | 0.5 C | [ |
| TiO2 | ~0.119 | nanofiber | 176.7 (100) | 0.1 C | [ |
| TiO2 | ~0.5 | fiber-in-tube | 177 (1000) | 200 mA/g | [ |
| Co3O4/TiO2 | ~0.3 | hierarchical | 602.7 (480) | 200 mA/g | [ |
Electrospun separators for LIBs and the corresponding electrochemical performance. PVdF: poly(vinylidene fluoride); HFP: hexafluoropropylene; TEGDA-BA: triethylene glycol diacetate-2-propenoic acid butyl ester; PEO: polyethylene oxide; LLTO: lithium lanthanum titanate oxide.
| Material | Diameter/μm | Conductivity/mS·cm−1 (T/°C) | DC (after-1st)/mAh·g−1 (Rate/C) | Anodic Stability Voltage/V (vs. Li/Li+) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PVdF | 1–1.65 | 1.0 (25) | - | 4.5 | [ |
| PVdF-HFP | 1 | 1.0 (20) | 136–142 (0.1) | 4.5 | [ |
| PVdF-HFP | 0.512–0.710 | 6.16 (20) | 138–184 (0.2) | 5.0 | [ |
| PVdF-HFP/SiO2 | 2–5 | 4.3 (25) | 139–170 (0.1) | - | [ |
| PVdF-HEP/SiO2 | 1–2 | 8.06 (20) | 153–170 (0.1) | >4.5 | [ |
| PVdF-HEP/PMMA | 0.200–0.350 | 2.0 (25) | 133.5–145 (0.1) | - | [ |
| PVdF-HEP/PAN | 0.320–0.490 | 1.0 (25) | 131–145 (0.1) | >4.6 | [ |
| PVdF/SiO2-PAALi | 0.750 | 3.5 (25) | 151–156.5 (0.1) | 5.05 | [ |
| PAN | 0.350 | 2.14 (25) | 135–150 (0.1) | >4.7 | [ |
| PAN | 0.880–1.260 | 1.7 (20) | 108–113 (0.5) | - | [ |
| PAN-PMMA | 0.2–1.0 | 5.1 (-) | 127–135 (0.1) | 5.2 | [ |
| PAN/SiO2 | 0.8–1.4 | 2.8–3.6 (-) | −163(0.2) | 4.75 | [ |
| PAN/SiO2 | 0.100–0.300 | 11 (-) | 127–139 (0.5) | 5.0 | [ |
| PAN/Al2O3-TEGDA-BA | 3–5 | 2.35 (25) | 240.4 (0.1) | >4.5 | [ |
| PAN-TEGDA-BA | 0.182 | 5.9 (25) | 127–163.6 (0.1) | >5.0 | [ |
| PAN-PEO | 0.250–0.330 | 5.36 (-) | 134 (0.1) | - | [ |
| PAN-LLTO | 0.250 | 1.95 (25) | 148–162 (0.2) | 5.0 | [ |
Scheme 3Schematic illustration of the typical preparation procedure for the Co3O4-based binder-free (CCTN) electrode. Reproduced with permission from [138]. Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015.
Figure 6(a) TEM micrographs of microtomed sections of 5 at. % Nb-SnO2 loose tubes obtained using 8.5 w/v % SnCl2. Inset: close-up of the cross-section of a loose-tube fiber. (b) Loose tubes of niobium-doped SnO2 (8.5 w/v % SnCl2 and 5 at. % Nb) prepared using heating rates of 1, 5 and 10 °C/min during calcination. Reproduced with permission from [165]. Copyright American Chemical Society, 2013.
Figure 7Schematic diagram of the fabrication procedure and SEM images of the bilayer TiO2 nanofiber photoanode (BNF: bigger-diameter nanofiber; SNF: smaller-diameter nanofiber). Reproduced with permission from [187]. Copyright Wiley, 2011.
Photovoltaic performance parameters of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) with electrospun fibers. FF: fill factor = Vmax × Jmax/Voc × Jsc.
| Material | Diameter/nm | Voc/V | Jsc/mA·cm−2 | FF (%) | η (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNF+Pt NPs | 250 | 0.83 | 12.66–13.33 | 65.6–68.8 | 7–8 | [ |
| CNF | 250 | 0.76 | 12.6 | 57 | 5.5 | [ |
| H-ACNF | 190/270 | 0.73 | 14.5 | 62 | 6.58 | [ |
| Meso-HACNF | 200/360 | 0.73/0.74 | 15.4/15.3 | 64/61 | 7.21/6.91 | [ |
| CNF+Co Cr NPs | - | 0.685 | 8.784 | 54 | 3.27 | [ |
| CNF+Co Ni NPs | - | 0.74 | 11.12 | 54 | 4.47 | [ |
| CNF+Co Pd NPs | 150 | 9.8 | 0.705 | 36 | 2.5 | [ |
| CNF+Cu Ni NPs | - | 0.70 | 7.67 | 65 | 3.5 | [ |
| CNF+Fe Ni NPs | 230 | 0.72 | 10.1 | 65 | 4.7 | [ |
| CNF/TiC | 280–300 | 0.73/0.72/0.72 | 9.29/9.71/9.56 | 62/64/63 | 4.2/4.5/4.3 | [ |
Figure 8Photocurrent density-voltage (J-V) curves for the DSSC containing (a) 0.5 M 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide (BMImI)-LE and (b) 0.5 M BMImI-esPME. Reproduced with permission from [209]. Copyright Wiley, 2015.
Photovoltaic performance of the DSSCs based on electrospun fibers.
| Material | Voc/V | Jsc/mA·cm−2 | FF (%) | η (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PVdF-HFP | 0.75 | 12.3 | 57 | 5.21 | [ |
| PVdF-HFP | 0.78/0.76/0.77 | 5.759/6.028/5.378 | 66.18/68.05/66.27 | 2.98//3.13/2.75 | [ |
| BMImI-esPME | 0.71 | 13.10 | 69 | 6.42 | [ |
| PVdF-HFP/PS | 0.76 | 11.8 | 66 | 5.75 | [ |
| PVdF-HFP/CoS | 0.73 | 14.42 | 70 | 7.34 | [ |
| PEO-PVdF-HFP-SiO2 | 0.58/0.60/0.59 | 13.37/13.63/13.18 | 60.24/59.54/59.67 | 4.68/4.85/4.66 | [ |
| PVdF-PAN-Fe2O3 | 0.77 | 10.4 | 62 | 4.9 | [ |
| PVdF-PAN-V2O5 | 0.78 | 13.8 | 72 | 7.75 | [ |