Literature DB >> 31950977

Effect of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis With Proton Pump Inhibitors vs Histamine-2 Receptor Blockers on In-Hospital Mortality Among ICU Patients Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: The PEPTIC Randomized Clinical Trial.

Paul J Young1,2, Sean M Bagshaw3, Andrew B Forbes4, Alistair D Nichol5,6,7, Stephen E Wright8, Michael Bailey6,9, Rinaldo Bellomo6,9,10, Richard Beasley1, Kathy Brickell7, Glenn M Eastwood10, David J Gattas11,12, Frank van Haren13, Edward Litton14, Diane M Mackle1, Colin J McArthur1,15, Shay P McGuinness1,16, Paul R Mouncey17, Leanlove Navarra1, Dawn Opgenorth3, David Pilcher5,6,18, Manoj K Saxena12,19, Steve A Webb20, Daisy Wiley17, Kathryn M Rowan17.   

Abstract

Importance: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine-2 receptor blockers (H2RBs) are often prescribed for patients as stress ulcer prophylaxis drugs in the intensive care unit (ICU). The comparative effect of these drugs on mortality is unknown. Objective: To compare in-hospital mortality rates using PPIs vs H2RBs for stress ulcer prophylaxis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster crossover randomized clinical trial conducted at 50 ICUs in 5 countries between August 2016 and January 2019. Patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation within 24 hours of ICU admission were followed up for 90 days at the hospital. Interventions: Two stress ulcer prophylaxis strategies were compared (preferential use with PPIs vs preferential use with H2RBs). Each ICU used each strategy sequentially for 6 months in random order; 25 ICUs were randomized to the sequence with use of PPIs and then use of H2RBs and 25 ICUs were randomized to the sequence with use of H2RBs and then use of PPIs (13 436 patients randomized by site to PPIs and 13 392 randomized by site to H2RBs). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 90 days during index hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding, Clostridioides difficile infection, and ICU and hospital lengths of stay.
Results: Among 26 982 patients who were randomized, 154 opted out, and 26 828 were analyzed (mean [SD] age, 58 [17.0] years; 9691 [36.1%] were women). There were 26 771 patients (99.2%) included in the mortality analysis; 2459 of 13 415 patients (18.3%) in the PPI group died at the hospital by day 90 and 2333 of 13 356 patients (17.5%) in the H2RB group died at the hospital by day 90 (risk ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.10]; absolute risk difference, 0.93 percentage points [95% CI, -0.01 to 1.88] percentage points; P = .054). An estimated 4.1% of patients randomized by ICU site to PPIs actually received H2RBs and an estimated 20.1% of patients randomized by ICU site to H2RBs actually received PPIs. Clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 1.3% of the PPI group and 1.8% of the H2RB group (risk ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.92]; absolute risk difference, -0.51 percentage points [95% CI, -0.90 to -0.12 percentage points]; P = .009). Rates of Clostridioides difficile infection and ICU and hospital lengths of stay were not significantly different by treatment group. One adverse event (an allergic reaction) was reported in 1 patient in the PPI group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among ICU patients requiring mechanical ventilation, a strategy of stress ulcer prophylaxis with use of proton pump inhibitors vs histamine-2 receptor blockers resulted in hospital mortality rates of 18.3% vs 17.5%, respectively, a difference that did not reach the significance threshold. However, study interpretation may be limited by crossover in the use of the assigned medication. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616000481471.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31950977      PMCID: PMC7029750          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.22190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  18 in total

1.  Separation of individual-level and cluster-level covariate effects in regression analysis of correlated data.

Authors:  Melissa D Begg; Michael K Parides
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Relative risks and confidence intervals were easily computed indirectly from multivariable logistic regression.

Authors:  A Russell Localio; David J Margolis; Jesse A Berlin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Cluster randomised crossover trials with binary data and unbalanced cluster sizes: application to studies of near-universal interventions in intensive care.

Authors:  Andrew B Forbes; Muhammad Akram; David Pilcher; Jamie Cooper; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Pantoprazole in Patients at Risk for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the ICU.

Authors:  Mette Krag; Søren Marker; Anders Perner; Jørn Wetterslev; Matt P Wise; Joerg C Schefold; Frederik Keus; Anne B Guttormsen; Stepani Bendel; Mark Borthwick; Theis Lange; Bodil S Rasmussen; Martin Siegemund; Helle Bundgaard; Thomas Elkmann; Jacob V Jensen; Rune D Nielsen; Lisbeth Liboriussen; Morten H Bestle; Jeanie M Elkjær; Dorte F Palmqvist; Minna Bäcklund; Jon H Laake; Per M Bådstøløkken; Juha Grönlund; Olena Breum; Akil Walli; Robert Winding; Susanne Iversen; Inge-Lise Jarnvig; Jonathan O White; Björn Brand; Martin B Madsen; Lars Quist; Klaus J Thornberg; Anders Møller; Jørgen Wiis; Anders Granholm; Carl T Anthon; Tine S Meyhoff; Peter B Hjortrup; Søren R Aagaard; Jo B Andreasen; Christina A Sørensen; Pernille Haure; Jacob Hauge; Alexa Hollinger; Jonas Scheuzger; Daniel Tuchscherer; Thierry Vuilliomenet; Jukka Takala; Stephan M Jakob; Marianne L Vang; Kim B Pælestik; Karen L D Andersen; Iwan C C van der Horst; Willem Dieperink; Jesper Fjølner; Cilia K W Kjer; Christine Sølling; Christoffer G Sølling; Johanna Karttunen; Matt P G Morgan; Brit Sjøbø; Janus Engstrøm; Birgit Agerholm-Larsen; Morten H Møller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Potential anti-inflammatory effects of proton pump inhibitors: a review and discussion of the clinical implications.

Authors:  Ramalinga R Kedika; Rhonda F Souza; Stuart Jon Spechler
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Effect of lansoprazole on human leukocyte function.

Authors:  E Capodicasa; F De Bellis; M A Pelli
Journal:  Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.730

7.  Nosocomial pneumonia risk and stress ulcer prophylaxis: a comparison of pantoprazole vs ranitidine in cardiothoracic surgery patients.

Authors:  Todd A Miano; Marc G Reichert; Timothy T Houle; Drew A MacGregor; Edward H Kincaid; David L Bowton
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Stress ulcer prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors or histamin-2 receptor antagonists in adult intensive care patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Marija Barbateskovic; Søren Marker; Anders Granholm; Carl Thomas Anthon; Mette Krag; Janus Christian Jakobsen; Anders Perner; Jørn Wetterslev; Morten Hylander Møller
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Histamine-2 receptor antagonists vs proton pump inhibitors on gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage and infectious complications in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Robert MacLaren; Paul M Reynolds; Richard R Allen
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Type of stress ulcer prophylaxis and risk of nosocomial pneumonia in cardiac surgical patients: cohort study.

Authors:  Brian T Bateman; Katsiaryna Bykov; Niteesh K Choudhry; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Joshua J Gagne; Jennifer M Polinski; Jessica M Franklin; Michael Doherty; Michael A Fischer; Jeremy A Rassen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-09-19
View more
  24 in total

1.  Could stress ulcer prophylaxis increase mortality in high-acuity patients?

Authors:  Michael O Harhay; Paul J Young; Manu Shankar-Hari
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  [Cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction].

Authors:  Karl Werdan; Markus Wolfgang Ferrari; Roland Prondzinsky; Martin Ruß
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 3.  Optimizing the Design and Analysis of Future AKI Trials.

Authors:  Matthieu Legrand; Sean M Bagshaw; Jay L Koyner; Ivonne H Schulman; Michael R Mathis; Juliane Bernholz; Steven Coca; Martin Gallagher; Stéphane Gaudry; Kathleen D Liu; Ravindra L Mehta; Romain Pirracchio; Abigail Ryan; Dominik Steubl; Norman Stockbridge; Fredrik Erlandsson; Alparslan Turan; F Perry Wilson; Alexander Zarbock; Michael P Bokoch; Jonathan D Casey; Patrick Rossignol; Michael O Harhay
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 14.978

Review 4.  Colorectal Surgery in Critically Unwell Patients: A Multidisciplinary Approach.

Authors:  Ashwin Subramaniam; Robert Wengritzky; Stewart Skinner; Kiran Shekar
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2022-02-09

5.  Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock- Diagnosis, Monitoring and Therapy–A German-Austrian S3 Guideline.

Authors:  Karl Werdan; Michael Buerke; Alexander Geppert; Holger Thiele; Bernd Zwissler; Martin Ruß
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Proton Pump Inhibitors and Incident Clostridioides difficile Infection: Beyond Controversy, Pragmatic Approaches Are Needed.

Authors:  Javier A Villafuerte-Gálvez
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Efficacy and safety of gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Long Ge; Zhikang Ye; Reed A Siemieniuk; Annika Reintam Blaser; Xin Wang; Anders Perner; Morten H Møller; Waleed Alhazzani; Deborah Cook; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  High Rate of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients with Secondary Sclerosing Cholangitis in Critically Ill Patients (SC-CIP).

Authors:  Andreas Blesl; Martin Eibisberger; Michael Schörghuber; Christoph Klivinyi; Vanessa Stadlbauer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  The Role of Dysbiosis in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Denise Battaglini; Chiara Robba; Andrea Fedele; Sebastian Trancǎ; Samir Giuseppe Sukkar; Vincenzo Di Pilato; Matteo Bassetti; Daniele Roberto Giacobbe; Antonio Vena; Nicolò Patroniti; Lorenzo Ball; Iole Brunetti; Antoni Torres Martí; Patricia Rieken Macedo Rocco; Paolo Pelosi
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-04

Review 10.  What can a learning healthcare system teach us about improving outcomes?

Authors:  Jonathan D Casey; Katherine R Courtright; Todd W Rice; Matthew W Semler
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.