Paul J Young1,2, Sean M Bagshaw3, Andrew B Forbes4, Alistair D Nichol5,6,7, Stephen E Wright8, Michael Bailey6,9, Rinaldo Bellomo6,9,10, Richard Beasley1, Kathy Brickell7, Glenn M Eastwood10, David J Gattas11,12, Frank van Haren13, Edward Litton14, Diane M Mackle1, Colin J McArthur1,15, Shay P McGuinness1,16, Paul R Mouncey17, Leanlove Navarra1, Dawn Opgenorth3, David Pilcher5,6,18, Manoj K Saxena12,19, Steve A Webb20, Daisy Wiley17, Kathryn M Rowan17. 1. Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington. 2. Intensive Care Unit, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand. 3. Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Canada. 4. Biostatistics Unit, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 5. Intensive Care Unit, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. 6. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 7. University College Dublin-Clinical Research Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. 8. Intensive Care Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, England. 9. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 10. Intensive Care Unit, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia. 11. Intensive Care Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia. 12. George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 13. Intensive Care Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia. 14. Intensive Care Unit, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Australia. 15. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. 16. Cardiothoracic and Vascular Intensive Care Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. 17. Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, England. 18. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation, Camberwell, Australia. 19. Intensive Care Unit, Bankstown Hospital, Bankstown, Australia. 20. Intensive Care Unit, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Abstract
Importance: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine-2 receptor blockers (H2RBs) are often prescribed for patients as stress ulcer prophylaxis drugs in the intensive care unit (ICU). The comparative effect of these drugs on mortality is unknown. Objective: To compare in-hospital mortality rates using PPIs vs H2RBs for stress ulcer prophylaxis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster crossover randomized clinical trial conducted at 50 ICUs in 5 countries between August 2016 and January 2019. Patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation within 24 hours of ICU admission were followed up for 90 days at the hospital. Interventions: Two stress ulcer prophylaxis strategies were compared (preferential use with PPIs vs preferential use with H2RBs). Each ICU used each strategy sequentially for 6 months in random order; 25 ICUs were randomized to the sequence with use of PPIs and then use of H2RBs and 25 ICUs were randomized to the sequence with use of H2RBs and then use of PPIs (13 436 patients randomized by site to PPIs and 13 392 randomized by site to H2RBs). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 90 days during index hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding, Clostridioides difficile infection, and ICU and hospital lengths of stay. Results:Among 26 982 patients who were randomized, 154 opted out, and 26 828 were analyzed (mean [SD] age, 58 [17.0] years; 9691 [36.1%] were women). There were 26 771 patients (99.2%) included in the mortality analysis; 2459 of 13 415 patients (18.3%) in the PPI group died at the hospital by day 90 and 2333 of 13 356 patients (17.5%) in the H2RB group died at the hospital by day 90 (risk ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.10]; absolute risk difference, 0.93 percentage points [95% CI, -0.01 to 1.88] percentage points; P = .054). An estimated 4.1% of patients randomized by ICU site to PPIs actually received H2RBs and an estimated 20.1% of patients randomized by ICU site to H2RBs actually received PPIs. Clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 1.3% of the PPI group and 1.8% of the H2RB group (risk ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.92]; absolute risk difference, -0.51 percentage points [95% CI, -0.90 to -0.12 percentage points]; P = .009). Rates of Clostridioides difficile infection and ICU and hospital lengths of stay were not significantly different by treatment group. One adverse event (an allergic reaction) was reported in 1 patient in the PPI group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among ICU patients requiring mechanical ventilation, a strategy of stress ulcer prophylaxis with use of proton pump inhibitors vs histamine-2 receptor blockers resulted in hospital mortality rates of 18.3% vs 17.5%, respectively, a difference that did not reach the significance threshold. However, study interpretation may be limited by crossover in the use of the assigned medication. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616000481471.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine-2 receptor blockers (H2RBs) are often prescribed for patients as stress ulcer prophylaxis drugs in the intensive care unit (ICU). The comparative effect of these drugs on mortality is unknown. Objective: To compare in-hospital mortality rates using PPIs vs H2RBs for stress ulcer prophylaxis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster crossover randomized clinical trial conducted at 50 ICUs in 5 countries between August 2016 and January 2019. Patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation within 24 hours of ICU admission were followed up for 90 days at the hospital. Interventions: Two stress ulcer prophylaxis strategies were compared (preferential use with PPIs vs preferential use with H2RBs). Each ICU used each strategy sequentially for 6 months in random order; 25 ICUs were randomized to the sequence with use of PPIs and then use of H2RBs and 25 ICUs were randomized to the sequence with use of H2RBs and then use of PPIs (13 436 patients randomized by site to PPIs and 13 392 randomized by site to H2RBs). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 90 days during index hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding, Clostridioides difficile infection, and ICU and hospital lengths of stay. Results: Among 26 982 patients who were randomized, 154 opted out, and 26 828 were analyzed (mean [SD] age, 58 [17.0] years; 9691 [36.1%] were women). There were 26 771 patients (99.2%) included in the mortality analysis; 2459 of 13 415 patients (18.3%) in the PPI group died at the hospital by day 90 and 2333 of 13 356 patients (17.5%) in the H2RB group died at the hospital by day 90 (risk ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.10]; absolute risk difference, 0.93 percentage points [95% CI, -0.01 to 1.88] percentage points; P = .054). An estimated 4.1% of patients randomized by ICU site to PPIs actually received H2RBs and an estimated 20.1% of patients randomized by ICU site to H2RBs actually received PPIs. Clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 1.3% of the PPI group and 1.8% of the H2RB group (risk ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.92]; absolute risk difference, -0.51 percentage points [95% CI, -0.90 to -0.12 percentage points]; P = .009). Rates of Clostridioides difficile infection and ICU and hospital lengths of stay were not significantly different by treatment group. One adverse event (an allergic reaction) was reported in 1 patient in the PPI group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among ICU patients requiring mechanical ventilation, a strategy of stress ulcer prophylaxis with use of proton pump inhibitors vs histamine-2 receptor blockers resulted in hospital mortality rates of 18.3% vs 17.5%, respectively, a difference that did not reach the significance threshold. However, study interpretation may be limited by crossover in the use of the assigned medication. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616000481471.
Authors: Mette Krag; Søren Marker; Anders Perner; Jørn Wetterslev; Matt P Wise; Joerg C Schefold; Frederik Keus; Anne B Guttormsen; Stepani Bendel; Mark Borthwick; Theis Lange; Bodil S Rasmussen; Martin Siegemund; Helle Bundgaard; Thomas Elkmann; Jacob V Jensen; Rune D Nielsen; Lisbeth Liboriussen; Morten H Bestle; Jeanie M Elkjær; Dorte F Palmqvist; Minna Bäcklund; Jon H Laake; Per M Bådstøløkken; Juha Grönlund; Olena Breum; Akil Walli; Robert Winding; Susanne Iversen; Inge-Lise Jarnvig; Jonathan O White; Björn Brand; Martin B Madsen; Lars Quist; Klaus J Thornberg; Anders Møller; Jørgen Wiis; Anders Granholm; Carl T Anthon; Tine S Meyhoff; Peter B Hjortrup; Søren R Aagaard; Jo B Andreasen; Christina A Sørensen; Pernille Haure; Jacob Hauge; Alexa Hollinger; Jonas Scheuzger; Daniel Tuchscherer; Thierry Vuilliomenet; Jukka Takala; Stephan M Jakob; Marianne L Vang; Kim B Pælestik; Karen L D Andersen; Iwan C C van der Horst; Willem Dieperink; Jesper Fjølner; Cilia K W Kjer; Christine Sølling; Christoffer G Sølling; Johanna Karttunen; Matt P G Morgan; Brit Sjøbø; Janus Engstrøm; Birgit Agerholm-Larsen; Morten H Møller Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Todd A Miano; Marc G Reichert; Timothy T Houle; Drew A MacGregor; Edward H Kincaid; David L Bowton Journal: Chest Date: 2009-03-24 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Marija Barbateskovic; Søren Marker; Anders Granholm; Carl Thomas Anthon; Mette Krag; Janus Christian Jakobsen; Anders Perner; Jørn Wetterslev; Morten Hylander Møller Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2019-01-24 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Brian T Bateman; Katsiaryna Bykov; Niteesh K Choudhry; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Joshua J Gagne; Jennifer M Polinski; Jessica M Franklin; Michael Doherty; Michael A Fischer; Jeremy A Rassen Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-09-19
Authors: Matthieu Legrand; Sean M Bagshaw; Jay L Koyner; Ivonne H Schulman; Michael R Mathis; Juliane Bernholz; Steven Coca; Martin Gallagher; Stéphane Gaudry; Kathleen D Liu; Ravindra L Mehta; Romain Pirracchio; Abigail Ryan; Dominik Steubl; Norman Stockbridge; Fredrik Erlandsson; Alparslan Turan; F Perry Wilson; Alexander Zarbock; Michael P Bokoch; Jonathan D Casey; Patrick Rossignol; Michael O Harhay Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2022-07-13 Impact factor: 14.978
Authors: Karl Werdan; Michael Buerke; Alexander Geppert; Holger Thiele; Bernd Zwissler; Martin Ruß Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Ying Wang; Long Ge; Zhikang Ye; Reed A Siemieniuk; Annika Reintam Blaser; Xin Wang; Anders Perner; Morten H Møller; Waleed Alhazzani; Deborah Cook; Gordon H Guyatt Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Andreas Blesl; Martin Eibisberger; Michael Schörghuber; Christoph Klivinyi; Vanessa Stadlbauer Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Denise Battaglini; Chiara Robba; Andrea Fedele; Sebastian Trancǎ; Samir Giuseppe Sukkar; Vincenzo Di Pilato; Matteo Bassetti; Daniele Roberto Giacobbe; Antonio Vena; Nicolò Patroniti; Lorenzo Ball; Iole Brunetti; Antoni Torres Martí; Patricia Rieken Macedo Rocco; Paolo Pelosi Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2021-06-04