Literature DB >> 12898546

Separation of individual-level and cluster-level covariate effects in regression analysis of correlated data.

Melissa D Begg1, Michael K Parides.   

Abstract

The focus of this paper is regression analysis of clustered data. Although the presence of intracluster correlation (the tendency for items within a cluster to respond alike) is typically viewed as an obstacle to good inference, the complex structure of clustered data offers significant analytic advantages over independent data. One key advantage is the ability to separate effects at the individual (or item-specific) level and the group (or cluster-specific) level. We review different approaches for the separation of individual-level and cluster-level effects on response, their appropriate interpretation and give recommendations for model fitting based on the intent of the data analyst. Unlike many earlier papers on this topic, we place particular emphasis on the interpretation of the cluster-level covariate effect. The main ideas of the paper are highlighted in an analysis of the relationship between birth weight and IQ using sibling data from a large birth cohort study. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12898546     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  122 in total

1.  Variations in the use of an innovative technology by payer: the case of drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Andrew J Epstein; Jonathan D Ketcham; Saif S Rathore; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Birth size and adult size in same-sex siblings discordant for fetal growth in the Early Determinants of Adult Health study.

Authors:  L H Lumey; E Susser; H Andrews; M W Gillman
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Smoking antecedents: separating between- and within-person effects of tobacco dependence in a multiwave ecological momentary assessment investigation of adolescent smoking.

Authors:  Thomas M Piasecki; Constantine J Trela; Donald Hedeker; Robin J Mermelstein
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Racial disparities in changing to a high-volume urologist among men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Craig Evan Pollack; Justin E Bekelman; Andrew J Epstein; Kaijun Liao; Yu-Ning Wong; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  Differences in maternal smoking across successive pregnancies - dose-dependent relation to BMI z-score in the offspring: an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Albers; R von Kries; C Sobotzki; H J Gao; S L Buka; V L Clifton; L E Grzeskowiak; E Oken; T Paus; Z Pausova; S L Rifas-Shiman; A J Sharma; S E Gilman
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 9.213

6.  Prolonged intravenous therapy versus early transition to oral antimicrobial therapy for acute osteomyelitis in children.

Authors:  Theoklis Zaoutis; A Russell Localio; Kateri Leckerman; Stephanie Saddlemire; David Bertoch; Ron Keren
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Elevated risk of nicotine dependence among sib-pairs discordant for maternal smoking during pregnancy: evidence from a 40-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Edmond D Shenassa; George D Papandonatos; Michelle L Rogers; Stephen L Buka
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  A Bayesian multilevel model for estimating the diet/disease relationship in a multicenter study with exposures measured with error: the EPIC study.

Authors:  Pietro Ferrari; Raymond J Carroll; Paul Gustafson; Elio Riboli
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Modeling mood variation associated with smoking: an application of a heterogeneous mixed-effects model for analysis of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data.

Authors:  Donald Hedeker; Robin J Mermelstein; Michael L Berbaum; Richard T Campbell
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.526

10.  Antimüllerian hormone and antral follicle count are lower in female cancer survivors and healthy women taking hormonal contraception.

Authors:  Lauren N C Johnson; Mary D Sammel; Katherine E Dillon; Lara Lechtenberg; Allison Schanne; Clarisa R Gracia
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.