Literature DB >> 31949943

Robotic surgery in colorectal cancer: the way forward or a passing fad.

James Chi-Yong Ngu1, Seon-Hahn Kim2.   

Abstract

Introduced mainly to overcome the technical limitations of laparoscopy, robotic colorectal surgery (CRS) has been touted to provide superior optics, ergonomics, and surgeon autonomy. This technological advancement is nonetheless associated with certain drawbacks, mainly involving its cost and the lack of unequivocal benefit over conventional laparoscopy. In this era of evidence-based medicine, robotic CRS remains predominantly a subject of individual institution case series, retrospective studies, matched comparisons at best, and repeated reviews of the above literature. This article provides a critique of the more contemporary data regarding the use of robotics in colorectal cancer surgery and the controversies surrounding the literature. 2019 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Surgery; cancer; colorectal; laparoscopy; robot

Year:  2019        PMID: 31949943      PMCID: PMC6955008          DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.04.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  42 in total

Review 1.  Surgical research using national databases.

Authors:  Ram K Alluri; Hyuma Leland; Nathanael Heckmann
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

2.  A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery.

Authors:  Jeong Yeon Kim; Nam-Kyu Kim; Kang Young Lee; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Jang Hwan Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients.

Authors:  E Gorgun; V Ozben; M Costedio; L Stocchi; M Kalady; F Remzi
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  Robotic versus standard laparoscopic elective colectomy: where are the benefits?

Authors:  Audrey S Kulaylat; Katelin A Mirkin; Frances J Puleo; Christopher S Hollenbeak; Evangelos Messaris
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for lower rectal cancer: the impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Akio Shiomi; Yusuke Kinugasa; Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Hiroyasu Kagawa; Yushi Yamakawa
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The robotic approach significantly reduces length of stay after colectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed M Al-Mazrou; Codruta Chiuzan; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Urinary and erectile function in men after total mesorectal excision by laparoscopic or robot-assisted methods for the treatment of rectal cancer: a case-matched comparison.

Authors:  Soo Yeun Park; Gyu-Seog Choi; Jun Seok Park; Hye Jin Kim; Jong-Pil Ryuk; Sung-Hwan Yun
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Perioperative pain after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection.

Authors:  Rikke Tolstrup; Jonas Amstrup Funder; Liselotte Lundbech; Niels Thomassen; Lene Hjerrild Iversen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  The rough guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Authors:  G Biondi-Zoccai; M Lotrionte; G Landoni; M G Modena
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2011

10.  Robotic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients may lead to better short-term outcomes when compared to laparoscopy: a comparative propensity scored match study.

Authors:  Sofoklis Panteleimonitis; Oliver Pickering; Hassan Abbas; Mick Harper; Ngianga Kandala; Nuno Figueiredo; Tahseen Qureshi; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  2 in total

1.  Robotic or three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for right colectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME) and intracorporeal anastomosis? A propensity score-matching study comparison.

Authors:  Graziano Ceccarelli; Gianluca Costa; Valentina Ferraro; Michele De Rosa; Fabio Rondelli; Walter Bugiantella
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  National differences in implementation of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer and the influence on short-term outcomes.

Authors:  A K Warps; D Saraste; M Westerterp; R Detering; A Sjövall; A Martling; J W T Dekker; R A E M Tollenaar; P Matthiessen; P J Tanis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.453

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.