Literature DB >> 24366278

Urinary and erectile function in men after total mesorectal excision by laparoscopic or robot-assisted methods for the treatment of rectal cancer: a case-matched comparison.

Soo Yeun Park1, Gyu-Seog Choi, Jun Seok Park, Hye Jin Kim, Jong-Pil Ryuk, Sung-Hwan Yun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urinary and sexual dysfunction are recognized complications of rectal cancer surgery in men. This study compared robot-assisted total mesorectal excision (RTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) with regard to these functional outcomes.
METHODS: A series of 32 men who underwent RTME between February 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010 were matched 1:1 with patients who underwent LTME. The matching criteria were age, body mass index, tumor distance from the anal verge, neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, and tumor stage. Urinary and erectile function were evaluated using the International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) and the five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) scale. Data were collected from the two groups at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and compared.
RESULTS: The mean IPSS score did not differ between the two groups at baseline at any point of measurement. The mean baseline IIEF-5 score was similar between the two groups and was decreased at 3 months. The mean IIEF-5 score was significantly higher in the RTME group at 6 months than in the LTME group (14.1 ± 6.1 vs. 9.4 ± 6.6; p = 0.024). The interval decrease in IIEF-5 scores was significantly higher in the LTME group than in the RTME group at 6 months (4.9 ± 4.5 vs. 9.2 ± 4.7; p = 0.030).
CONCLUSIONS: The men in the RTME group experienced earlier restoration of erectile function than did those in the LTME group. Bladder function was similar during the 12 months after RTME or LTME.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24366278     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2419-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  30 in total

1.  Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands.

Authors:  E Kapiteijn; H Putter; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results.

Authors:  Christophe Laurent; Fabien Leblanc; Philippe Wütrich; Mathieu Scheffler; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery.

Authors:  Jeong Yeon Kim; Nam-Kyu Kim; Kang Young Lee; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Jang Hwan Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Urodynamic studies before and/or after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for carcinoma.

Authors:  P L Chang; H A Fan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Annibale D'Annibale; Graziano Pernazza; Igor Monsellato; Vito Pende; Giorgio Lucandri; Paolo Mazzocchi; Giovanni Alfano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Prospective study of sexual dysfunction in men with rectal cancer: feasibility and results of nerve sparing surgery.

Authors:  Valerio Celentano; Giovanni Fabbrocile; Gaetano Luglio; Giovanni Antonelli; Rachele Tarquini; Luigi Bucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Sexual function after treatment for rectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  Vanessa P Ho; Yoori Lee; Sharon L Stein; Larissa K F Temple
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997.

Authors:  R J Heald; B J Moran; R D Ryall; R Sexton; J K MacFarlane
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-08

9.  Male sexual and urinary function after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Mario Morino; Umberto Parini; Marco Ettore Allaix; Gabriella Monasterolo; Riccardo Brachet Contul; Corrado Garrone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer.

Authors:  H M Quah; D G Jayne; K W Eu; F Seow-Choen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  37 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center.

Authors:  Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Yusuke Kinugasa; Akio Shiomi; Hiroyuki Tomioka; Hiroyasu Kagawa; Yushi Yamakawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Erectile and urinary function in men with rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone: a randomized trial report.

Authors:  Meijin Huang; Jinxin Lin; Xihu Yu; Shen Chen; Liang Kang; Yanhong Deng; Jian Zheng; Yanxin Luo; Lei Wang; Ping Lan; Jianping Wang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Recent advances in robotic surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Soichiro Ishihara; Kensuke Otani; Koji Yasuda; Takeshi Nishikawa; Junichiro Tanaka; Toshiaki Tanaka; Tomomichi Kiyomatsu; Keisuke Hata; Kazushige Kawai; Hiroaki Nozawa; Shinsuke Kazama; Hironori Yamaguchi; Eiji Sunami; Joji Kitayama; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Outcome one year after robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: a consecutive cohort study.

Authors:  Sanne Harsløf; Anders Stouge; Niels Thomassen; Sissel Ravn; Søren Laurberg; Lene Hjerrild Iversen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-08-13       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Sexual and urinary outcomes in robotic rectal surgery: review of the literature and technical considerations.

Authors:  Fabrizio Luca; Danielle K Craigg; Maheswari Senthil; Matthew J Selleck; Blake D Babcock; Mark E Reeves; Carlos A Garberoglio
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-08-17

6.  Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Series of 392 Cases and Mid-Term Outcomes from A Single Center in China.

Authors:  Bo Tang; Chao Zhang; Chuan Li; Jun Chen; Huaxing Luo; Dongzhu Zeng; Peiwu Yu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Robotic surgery in colorectal cancer: the way forward or a passing fad.

Authors:  James Chi-Yong Ngu; Seon-Hahn Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-12

Review 8.  Sexual dysfunction following rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  V Celentano; R Cohen; J Warusavitarne; O Faiz; M Chand
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  The First Pilot Comprehensive Evaluation of the Outcomes of Different Types of Robotic Surgeries in the Different Surgical Departments: The Penta, Tetra and Trifecta Achievements in Robotic Surgeries.

Authors:  Takehiro Sejima; Shuichi Morizane; Kazunori Fujiwara; Keigo Ashida; Hiroaki Saito; Yuji Taniguchi; Hiroshige Nakamura; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.641

10.  Does robotic rectal cancer surgery improve the results of experienced laparoscopic surgeons? An observational single institution study comparing 168 robotic assisted with 184 laparoscopic rectal resections.

Authors:  Rogier M P H Crolla; Paul G Mulder; George P van der Schelling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.