Literature DB >> 29242972

Perioperative pain after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection.

Rikke Tolstrup1,2, Jonas Amstrup Funder3, Liselotte Lundbech1, Niels Thomassen1, Lene Hjerrild Iversen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In order to improve the surgical treatment of rectal cancer, robot-assisted laparoscopy has been introduced. The robot has gained widespread use; however, the scientific basis for treatment of rectal cancer is still unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether robot-assisted laparoscopic rectal resection cause less perioperative pain than standard laparoscopic resection measured by the numerical rating scale (NRS score) as well as morphine consumption.
METHODS: Fifty-one patients were randomized to either laparoscopic or robot-assisted rectal resection at the Department of Surgery at Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark. The intra-operative analgetic consumption was recorded prospectively and registered in patient records. Likewise all postoperative medicine administration including analgesia was recorded prospectively at the hospital medical charts. All morphine analogues were converted into equivalent oral morphine by a converter. Postoperative pain where measured by numeric rating scale (NRS) every hour at the postoperative care unit and three times a day at the ward.
RESULTS: Opioid consumption during operation was significantly lower during robotic-assisted surgery than during laparoscopic surgery (p=0.0001). However, there were no differences in opioid consumption or NRS in the period of recovery. We found no differences in length of surgery between the two groups; however, ten patients from the laparoscopic group underwent conversion to open surgery compared to one from the robotic group (p=0.005). No significant difference between groups with respect to complications where found.
CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, we found that patients who underwent rectal cancer resection by robotic technique needed less analgetics during surgery than patients operated laparoscopically. We did, however, not find any difference in postoperative pain score or morphine consumption postoperatively between the robotic and laparoscopic group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Pain; Postoperative pain; Rectal cancer; Robot; Robot-assisted laparoscopy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29242972     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2943-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  14 in total

Review 1.  Current therapies to shorten postoperative ileus.

Authors:  Michael D Johnson; R Matthew Walsh
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.321

2.  Minimally Invasive Robotic Association 2nd international congress: the Union League Club, New York, NY, USA, 18-20 January 2007.

Authors:  G W Taylor
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.547

3.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Trends in colorectal cancer survival in northern Denmark: 1985-2004.

Authors:  L H Iversen; M Nørgaard; P Jepsen; J Jacobsen; M M Christensen; P Gandrup; M R Madsen; S Laurberg; P Wogelius; H T Sørensen
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Oncologic and Clinicopathologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Ajit Pai; Slawomir J Marecik; John J Park; George Melich; Suela Sulo; Leela M Prasad
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Minia Hellan; Casandra Anderson; Joshua D I Ellenhorn; Benjamin Paz; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  S H Baik; Y T Ko; C M Kang; W J Lee; N K Kim; S K Sohn; H S Chi; C H Cho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Total robotic radical rectal resection with da Vinci Xi system: single docking, single phase technique.

Authors:  Anup Sunil Tamhankar; Sudhir Jatal; Avanish Saklani
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.547

9.  Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  David Jayne; Alessio Pigazzi; Helen Marshall; Julie Croft; Neil Corrigan; Joanne Copeland; Phil Quirke; Nick West; Tero Rautio; Niels Thomassen; Henry Tilney; Mark Gudgeon; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Richard Edlin; Claire Hulme; Julia Brown
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Fiona J Collinson; David G Jayne; Alessio Pigazzi; Charles Tsang; Jennifer M Barrie; Richard Edlin; Christopher Garbett; Pierre Guillou; Ivana Holloway; Helen Howard; Helen Marshall; Christopher McCabe; Sue Pavitt; Phil Quirke; Carly S Rivers; Julia M B Brown
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Robotic surgery in colorectal cancer: the way forward or a passing fad.

Authors:  James Chi-Yong Ngu; Seon-Hahn Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-12

2.  Analysis of Opioid Use in Patients Undergoing Open Versus Robotic Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Yuki Hirata; Russell G Witt; Laura R Prakash; Elsa M Arvide; Kristen A Robinson; Vijaya Gottumukkala; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Paul Mansfield; Brian D Badgwell; Naruhiko Ikoma
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.339

3.  Difference in surgical outcomes of rectal cancer by study design: meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials, case-matched studies, and cohort studies.

Authors:  N Hoshino; T Sakamoto; K Hida; Y Takahashi; H Okada; K Obama; T Nakayama
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-03-05

4.  Comparison between epidural technique and mid-axillary ultrasound-guided TAP block for postoperative analgesia of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a quasi-randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ana Tejedor; Carme Deiros; Marta García; Marina Vendrell; Nuria Gómez; Esther Gómez; Josep Masdeu
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-04-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.